CMM - Cisco Multicast Manager www.cisco.com/go/cmm
2010/7/21 James Hess mysi...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Antonio Querubin t...@lava.net wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
Maybe they are having issues with their multicast mail routing protocol.
Looks like
Hi folks,
Can someone from amazon dot de or dot com onlineshop
contact me off-list regarding some abuse or rather anomolies with my
account?
Thanks a lot.
I would be appreciate if someone could assist me.
best regards,
-FliTTi
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I was wondering what was going on. Kinda tired of seeing my own emails over and
over
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:22:14 -0700
From: se...@rollernet.us
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Multicast Network Monitoring
On 7/20/2010 06:11, Brandon Kim wrote:
Interesting question, I'd
This says it's not just down for me. http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pch.net
Anyone else?
Loads from here (outside of Toronto, ON) - peered with them.
Seemed slow to load though..
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Jason Lewis [mailto:jle...@packetnexus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 8:45 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: PCH.net down?
This says it's not just down for me.
From everywhere I've tried, it connects but loads slowly.
On Jul 21, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Jason Lewis wrote:
This says it's not just down for me.
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pch.net
Anyone else?
Also ok from France.
Lg also working fine (https://prefix.pch.net/applications/lg/), do you
need to look through a specific glass?
Loads from here (outside of Toronto, ON) - peered with them.
Seemed slow to load though..
It seems to be fine for me as well, in Australia. Loading time was a bit
slow, but I do have a few downloads running.
On 21/07/2010 8:44 PM, Jason Lewis wrote:
This says it's not just down for me. http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pch.net
Anyone else?
I received the same message from http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pch.net
but if I go to the site directly from Miami it pulls up, but is slow to do
so.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stewart [mailto:pstew...@nexicomgroup.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 8:47 AM
To: Jason Lewis;
Hi
IETF IPv6 Operations WG is looking at this draft, and we're interested in any
comments you might have as well.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines
Guidelines for Using IPv6 Transition Mechanisms, Jari Arkko, Fred
Baker, 12-Jul-10
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Allen Bass allen_b...@comcast.net wrote:
I received the same message from http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pch.net
but if I go to the site directly from Miami it pulls up, but is slow to do
everyone should take careful note... downforeveryoneorjustme.com
Very interesting - thanks for sharing that tip
Paul
-Original Message-
From: christopher.mor...@gmail.com [mailto:christopher.mor...@gmail.com]
On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 11:49 AM
To: Allen Bass
Cc: Paul Stewart; Jason Lewis; nanog@nanog.org
Hello,
Do you know of any vpn exchange point implementations please? -I mean
something like IXP but for mpls vpns
Let's say I'm an ISP that bought or merged with many small ISPs each with it's
own AS# and would like to start offering mpls vpn services end to end
If there would be just a few
On Jul 21, 2010, at 9:13 AM, Vitkovsky, Adam wrote:
Do you know of any vpn exchange point implementations please? -I mean
something like IXP but for mpls vpns
That would be like an IXP but for email. Or an IXP but for web traffic. VPNs
are an application that run over IP, and IXPs are
We've been working on an exercise for the IPv6 training course we deliver for
LIRs. It's aimed at people who are unfamiliar with IPv6, so the goal is to get
them to the point where once they get their IPv6 /32 allocation, they have a
good idea how to subdivide prefixes over their network and
On Jul 21, 2010, at 5:44 AM, Jason Lewis wrote:
This says it's not just down for me.
http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pch.net
Anyone else?
We don't know of an outage this morning, but one of our web servers has been a
bit slow because someone's been multi-thread downloading our
On 2010-07-21 12:57, Alex Band wrote:
We've been working on an exercise for the IPv6 training course we deliver for
LIRs. It's aimed at people who are unfamiliar with IPv6, so the goal is to
get them to the point where once they get their IPv6 /32 allocation, they
have a good idea how to
http://pch.net/home/index.php
I got there with no problem
-henry
From: Bill Woodcock wo...@pch.net
To: Jason Lewis jle...@packetnexus.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wed, July 21, 2010 9:58:24 AM
Subject: Re: PCH.net down?
On Jul 21, 2010, at 5:44 AM, Jason
Alex this looks great! Just printed it out and will play with it. I've spent
some time learning
IPv6 but when you're not looking at it daily, you begin to forget
From: al...@ripe.net
Subject: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:57:01 +0200
To:
On 21 jul 2010, at 19:22, Simon Perreault wrote:
On 2010-07-21 12:57, Alex Band wrote:
We've been working on an exercise for the IPv6 training course we deliver
for LIRs. It's aimed at people who are unfamiliar with IPv6, so the goal is
to get them to the point where once they get their
I currently have a v4 BGP session with AS 701 and recently requested a v6
BGP session to which I was told a tunnel session will be provided (Same
circuit would be better but whatever!). Towards the final stage in
discussions I was told that it will cost $1500. I find this quite ridiculous
and it
On 21 jul 2010, at 21:08, Zaid Ali wrote:
I currently have a v4 BGP session with AS 701 and recently requested a v6
BGP session to which I was told a tunnel session will be provided (Same
circuit would be better but whatever!). Towards the final stage in
discussions I was told that it will
I recently began the process of turning up BGP to AS 701 with both V4 and V6
peers and there were no additional costs.
Nathan Sipes
Sr. Network Design Specialist
Tel: 303-914-4996
FAX: 303-763-3510
Kinder Morgan
370 Van Gordon St
Lakewood, CO
80228
nathan_si...@kindermorgan.com
Is dual-stacking with an edge device considered native? Or is true native
when you have
an edge device or any network device for that matter that's v6 only?
Just curious
Subject: Re: v6 bgp peer costs?
From: mar...@marcoh.net
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:22:14 +0200
To:
On 7/21/2010 12:34, Brandon Kim wrote:
Is dual-stacking with an edge device considered native? Or is true native
when you have
an edge device or any network device for that matter that's v6 only?
Just curious
Dual stack is considered native, i.e. no tunnels.
~Seth
You can get a free IPv6 BGP tunnel from Hurricane Electric at
http://tunnelbroker.net
We have tunnel servers spread through out the world, so typically the
nearest server has reasonably low latency from your location.
Of course our main business is selling wholesale native IPv6 and IPv4
On 7/21/2010 12:08, Zaid Ali wrote:
I currently have a v4 BGP session with AS 701 and recently requested a v6
BGP session to which I was told a tunnel session will be provided (Same
circuit would be better but whatever!). Towards the final stage in
discussions I was told that it will cost
ARIN is pleased to offer a Meetings Fellowship Program to bring new voices and
ideas to public policy discussions. This call is for Fellows to attend ARIN
XXVI in Atlanta, GA from 6-8 October 2010. If you have never attended an ARIN
meeting and are interested in participating in the program,
NANOG50 BOF Atlanta.311 IEEE 802.1Q VLAN
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q
Triple-Tagging with 66-bit Addressing (48+18)
IP Addresses in MAC fields
NANOG operational testing needed with sample EDU reference routers
http://NetFPGA.org
BYOR - Bring/Buid Your Own Router - gigE to SATA
On 7/21/10 12:22 PM, Marco Hogewoning mar...@marcoh.net wrote:
On 21 jul 2010, at 21:08, Zaid Ali wrote:
I currently have a v4 BGP session with AS 701 and recently requested a v6
BGP session to which I was told a tunnel session will be provided (Same
circuit would be better but
On 2010-07-21 14:47, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
For a novice ? I wouldn't recommend it. From what I get back 'in the field'
it's already hard enough to get people familliar to the whole concept of
hexadecimal without going into bit level. But then again, if you are a fairly
technical company
I already have a v6 BGP tunnel with Hurricane Electric and works like a
charm :) It is other vendors I am concerned about.
Zaid
On 7/21/10 12:38 PM, Mike Leber mle...@he.net wrote:
You can get a free IPv6 BGP tunnel from Hurricane Electric at
http://tunnelbroker.net
We have tunnel
OP is referencing MPLS/BGP VPNs, not like IPsec VPNs. And I'm not sure
that I've (personally) ever heard of an IXP for MPLS. The question
really is... does it make sense for carriers to create an MPLS/BGP VPN
sort of internet? I'd vote probably not in their immediate interests.
--WM
On Wed, Jul
On 21 jul 2010, at 21:50, Simon Perreault wrote:
On 2010-07-21 14:47, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
For a novice ? I wouldn't recommend it. From what I get back 'in the field'
it's already hard enough to get people familliar to the whole concept of
hexadecimal without going into bit level. But
On 7/21/10 12:39 PM, Seth Mattinen se...@rollernet.us wrote:
On 7/21/2010 12:08, Zaid Ali wrote:
I currently have a v4 BGP session with AS 701 and recently requested a v6
BGP session to which I was told a tunnel session will be provided (Same
circuit would be better but whatever!). Towards
Hi Owen,
The RIPE NCC does actually ask for an addressing plan before we allocate a /32
IPv6, so I didn't phrase my opening email 100% accurate; we don't just blindly
hand it out. On the other hand, we don't do rigorous checks if it is actually
any good, or appropriate for their network.
What
Do any tools exist for automatically creating DNS zone files from
CDP/SNMP information? Do large networks typically do this in an
automated way?
Thanks.
Kent Frederick
Network Architect, Network Services
Iron Mountain
745 Atlantic Ave
Boston, MA 02111
Phone: (617) 535-4901
Mobile: (617) 894-7349
Fax: (208) 475-6722
kent.freder...@ironmountain.com
www.ironmountain.com
The information contained in this email message and its attachments is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Our Network Documentation Tool [1] can generate DNS records for each
device interface with an IP address.
[1] https://netdot.uoregon.edu
[2]
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog49/presentations/Tuesday/Vicente-netdot-presentation-nanog49.pdf
cv
vpn exchange point VLAN Exchange Points NANOG50 Atlanta.311
Tagged VLANs make most sense in dense MetroLANs (MANs)
What goes on in Atlanta Stays in Atlanta - NANOG50
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.1Q
What goes on in North America Stays in North America ? NA ? North America ?
Note:
On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:59 PM, William McCall wrote:
OP is referencing MPLS/BGP VPNs, not like IPsec VPNs. And I'm not sure
that I've (personally) ever heard of an IXP for MPLS.
Isn't that what one iteration of IXP-NSP in Japan was? I seem to recall that
they talked about it a lot, back
On Jul 21, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:59 PM, William McCall wrote:
OP is referencing MPLS/BGP VPNs, not like IPsec VPNs. And I'm not
sure
that I've (personally) ever heard of an IXP for MPLS.
Isn't that what one iteration of IXP-NSP in Japan was? I
NANOG to NEWNOG - BootCamp - August 9 - Friday, August 13, 2010
Restart or jumpstart your career with Router fundamentals
http://netfpga.org/tutorials/SummerCamp2010/index.php
Atlanta.311 NANOG50
http://netfpga.org/foswiki/bin/view/NetFPGA/OneGig/ProjectTable
Virtual Data Plane 1.2 In
On 2010-07-21-15:08:10, Zaid Ali z...@zaidali.com wrote:
I currently have a v4 BGP session with AS 701 and recently requested a v6
BGP session to which I was told a tunnel session will be provided (Same
circuit would be better but whatever!). Towards the final stage in
discussions I was told
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:48:42AM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Allen Bass allen_b...@comcast.net wrote:
I received the same message from http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/pch.net
but if I go to the site directly from Miami it pulls up, but is slow to do
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 18:57 +0200, Alex Band wrote:
We've been working on an exercise for the IPv6 training course
[...]
how to subdivide prefixes over their network and how to write an
addressing plan.
Here's a PDF with the exercise (two pages A3): http://bit.ly/c7jZRJ
I'm curious to hear
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Fred Baker f...@cisco.com wrote:
IETF IPv6 Operations WG is looking at this draft, and we're interested
in any comments you might have as well.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arkko-ipv6-transition-guidelines
Guidelines for Using IPv6 Transition Mechanisms,
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:57:01 +0200
Alex Band al...@ripe.net wrote:
We've been working on an exercise for the IPv6 training course we deliver for
LIRs. It's aimed at people who are unfamiliar with IPv6, so the goal is to
get them to the point where once they get their IPv6 /32 allocation,
On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:57:01 +0200
Alex Band al...@ripe.net wrote:
We've been working on an exercise for the IPv6 training course we deliver for
LIRs. It's aimed at people who are unfamiliar with IPv6, so the goal is to
get them to the point where once they get their IPv6 /32 allocation,
I think it is a very well planned exercise. I would suggest you not to
be straight in its execution. In some point, you could ask if the
decisions would be the same in cases with different conditions: more
pops, more users, less users, etc...
We have a similar exercise in our training at NIC.br
There is a third major challenge to dual-stack that isn't addressed in
the document: differing network security models that must deliver the
same result for the same collection of hosts regardless of whether
Ipv4 or v6 is selected. I can throw a COTS d-link box with
address-overloaded NAT
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 20:37 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
I can throw a COTS d-link box with
address-overloaded NAT on a connection and have reasonably effective
network security and anonymity in IPv4. Achieving comparable results
in the IPv6 portion of the dual stack on each of those hosts is
- Original Message -
From: Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 22 July, 2010 4:24:59 PM
Subject: Re: Looking for comments
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 20:37 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
I can throw a COTS d-link box with
address-overloaded NAT on a
On Jul 21, 2010, at 9:58 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 22 July, 2010 4:24:59 PM
Subject: Re: Looking for comments
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 20:37 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
I can throw a COTS
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au, nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 22 July, 2010 5:35:24 PM
Subject: Re: Looking for comments
On Jul 21, 2010, at 9:58 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
On
55 matches
Mail list logo
