On Jul 30, 2010, at 12:55 AM, James Hess wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
wrote:
Hmmm, from the interview of the British guy, the smart card seems
to be in UK (he did a lapsus on it), which differs from what you
describe.
You gotta read up on the
On 29 July 2010 18:08, Leo Vegoda leo.veg...@icann.org wrote:
There's a good chance that in the long run multi-subnet home networks will
become the norm.
With all due respect, I can't see it. Why would a home user need
multiple subnets? Are they really likely to have CPE capable of
routing
On 2010-07-30 09:27, Matthew Walster wrote:
On 29 July 2010 18:08, Leo Vegoda leo.veg...@icann.org wrote:
There's a good chance that in the long run multi-subnet home networks will
become the norm.
With all due respect, I can't see it. Why would a home user need
multiple subnets?
*
On 30 July 2010 08:32, Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org wrote:
On 2010-07-30 09:27, Matthew Walster wrote:
On 29 July 2010 18:08, Leo Vegoda leo.veg...@icann.org wrote:
There's a good chance that in the long run multi-subnet home networks will
become the norm.
With all due respect, I can't
Matthew,
On Jul 30, 2010, at 9:27 AM, Matthew Walster wrote:
On 29 July 2010 18:08, Leo Vegoda leo.veg...@icann.org wrote:
There's a good chance that in the long run multi-subnet home networks will
become the norm.
Why would a home user need multiple subnets?
Even today, people are
On 30 July 2010 09:20, David Conrad d...@virtualized.org wrote:
Even today, people are deploying multiple subnets in their homes. For
example, Apple's Airport allows you to trivially set up a guest network
that uses a different prefix (192.168.0.0/24) and different SSID than your
normal
On Jul 30, 2010, at 12:27 AM, Matthew Walster wrote:
On 29 July 2010 18:08, Leo Vegoda leo.veg...@icann.org wrote:
There's a good chance that in the long run multi-subnet home networks will
become the norm.
With all due respect, I can't see it. Why would a home user need
multiple
Hello,
I am looking for monitoring tools that already have support to IPv6. I
am looking for both freeware and commercial tools.
Please, do you know what network management system are already
supporting IPv6 ?
Thanks
./diogo -montagner
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 11:38:56PM -0400, Atticus wrote:
What world do live in? Yes, we extend the life of IPv4 by increasing the
numeric range. As for only needing port 80, I'm not really sure where
you've been for the last decade or so. There's are hundreds of services
using different ports,
On Jul 30, 2010, at 1:13 AM, Matthew Walster wrote:
On 30 July 2010 08:32, Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org wrote:
On 2010-07-30 09:27, Matthew Walster wrote:
On 29 July 2010 18:08, Leo Vegoda leo.veg...@icann.org wrote:
There's a good chance that in the long run multi-subnet home networks
Hi,
I am looking for monitoring tools that already have support to IPv6. I
am looking for both freeware and commercial tools.
Please, do you know what network management system are already
supporting IPv6 ?
we keep the list in the LIR Handbook (page #64)
Hi,
* Matthew Walster
On 30 July 2010 09:20, David Conradd...@virtualized.org wrote:
Even today, people are deploying multiple subnets in their homes.
For example, Apple's Airport allows you to trivially set up a
guest network that uses a different prefix (192.168.0.0/24) and
different SSID
On 30 July 2010 09:53, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
2. Yes, they are already available. A moderate PC with 4 Gig-E
ports can actually route all four of them at near wire speed.
For 10/100Mbps, you can get full featured CPE like the SRX-100
for around $500.
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:11:04 BST, Matthew Walster said:
Seriously, this is getting silly. I'm not even going to respond any
more - if you genuinely think users care about network management,
you're wrong. They treat it as a black box, and that isn't going to
change for a long, long, long time.
I think he was looking for something more in the nature of network
monitoring/analysis systems that support IPv6, like NTOP.
ntop has been ported to ipv6--although I am unsure of the results.
http://www.ntop.org/trac/wiki/ntop
cold is a snffer/analyzer with ipv6 support.
Yes. This one. But also looking for IPv6 support for tools like
OpenView, Infovista, Concord eHealth.
Thanks
./diogo -montagner
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Patrick Darden dar...@armc.org wrote:
I think he was looking for something more in the nature of network
monitoring/analysis
In a message written on Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 09:13:54AM +0100, Matthew Walster
wrote:
On 30 July 2010 08:32, Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org wrote:
On 2010-07-30 09:27, Matthew Walster wrote:
On 29 July 2010 18:08, Leo Vegoda leo.veg...@icann.org wrote:
With all due respect, I can't see it.
https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://www.6diss.org/tutorials/management.pdf
http://tools.6net.org/
--- diogo.montag...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Diogo Montagner diogo.montag...@gmail.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Monitoring tools for IPv6 tools
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:06:31 +0800
Matthew Walster wrote:
On 29 July 2010 18:08, Leo Vegoda leo.veg...@icann.org wrote:
There's a good chance that in the long run multi-subnet home networks will
become the norm.
With all due respect, I can't see it. Why would a home user need
multiple subnets? Are they really likely
Anyone on the list who can offer an explanation about the following
scenario? We have taken this up with providers at either end but it
will take awhile to filter up to the ASes in question.
We were seeing a London to Singapore connection go via San Jose
causing a 50%+ increase in latency.
It
On Jul 30, 2010, at 3:11 AM, Matthew Walster wrote:
On 30 July 2010 09:53, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
2. Yes, they are already available. A moderate PC with 4 Gig-E
ports can actually route all four of them at near wire speed.
For 10/100Mbps, you can get full
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to
BGP Update Report
Interval: 22-Jul-10 -to- 29-Jul-10 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS472542987 2.5% 333.2 -- ODN SOFTBANK TELECOM Corp.
2 - AS25620 25906
This report has been generated at Fri Jul 30 21:11:44 2010 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
Hi,
thanks for the link.
This was the best compilation that I found before. Unfortunately, this
presentation is a little bit old (2006). I am supposing that most of
commercial tools have improved your IPv6 support.
Thanks
./diogo -montagner
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:07 PM, nanogf .
25 matches
Mail list logo
