On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
> On Aug 4, 2010, at 1:35 17AM, William Herrin wrote:
>> For the latter, you're providing significant amounts of a public
>> resource (IP addresses) to a business whose contact information you're
>> contractually and ethically obligated to rev
+1
During the P3P too-and-fro on what constituted PII I lost the argument
that masking off the last bits constituted acceptable non-disclosure
of PII.
Additionally, viewing the long/lat of a property where b/w and
addresses are provisioned as the legal entity which owns the building
seems o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Steven Bellovin
wrote:
>
> On Aug 4, 2010, at 1:35 17AM, William Herrin wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
>>> If it is a business, then accurate address does not seem to me an
>>> issue
On Aug 4, 2010, at 1:35 17AM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
>> If it is a business, then accurate address does not seem to me an
>> issue, if it is a private address, I think a bit of fuzziness is helpful
>
> An apartment complex/condo/etc is a bus
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Thomas Weible wrote:
the setup with two media-converters works but has a major drawback. If
you want to see the overall line (digital diagnostic) you always have to
take into consideration that there are actually 3 physical links
involved in the overall link. Looking from y
Hi,
the setup with two media-converters works but has a major drawback. If you want
to see the overall line (digital diagnostic) you always have to take into
consideration that there are actually 3 physical links involved in the overall
link. Looking from your routers you only see the SX link (
Thanks for the input, Justin. I'm familiar with Transition Networks and have
used their solutions in other scenarios (as well as MRV). I'm aware of the
fiber characteristics being a major factor of the link budget and
dispersion, etc. I am waiting on measurements from the company who is
finishing t
GNS is just a front end for dynamips/qemu. ASA will run under qemu without
the use of extra wrappers/tools. it will run natively under vmware too. ASA
is basically an application running above a linux kernel. I forget what the
internal name is, lisa or similar…
-g
On Aug 4, 2010, at 1
On 8/4/2010 9:53 AM, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
Le 4 août 2010 à 15:14, Mirko Maffioli a écrit :
2010/7/25 Laurens Vets:
Cisco PIX: no, Cisco ASA: yes. It even runs under VMware... It's however
very hackish... :)
Cisco ASA under VMware?? :|
CiscoASA is based on x86, the
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Abello, Vinny wrote:
Any pointers on real world experience on this topic would greatly be
appreciated. What are people using successfully out there as far as third
party SFP's go to hit a distance of approximately 115km? This would be for a
Catalyst 6506. Cisco's solution was
it works, i see folks creating networks of hosts under ESXi protected by an
ASA instance.. not for production.I'm sure its not legal but Cisco doesn't
seem to have a strong stand on it, I'd think as long as you are using it for
educational use and not commercial, they may not care a whole
I assume the ASA's don't run natively on VMware or Xen, I assume you have to
use something like GNS3. I think that would be fine for testing, but in real
world production running an ASA on GNS3 under an another OS seems like a bad
idea. I hope Cisco will come out with Virtual Appliances for so
Hello,
Any pointers on real world experience on this topic would greatly be
appreciated. What are people using successfully out there as far as third
party SFP's go to hit a distance of approximately 115km? This would be for a
Catalyst 6506. Cisco's solution was a much more costly EDFA solution
On Aug 4, 2010, at 9:53 AM, Xavier Beaudouin wrote:
>
> Le 4 août 2010 à 15:14, Mirko Maffioli a écrit :
>
>> 2010/7/25 Laurens Vets :
>>>
>>> Cisco PIX: no, Cisco ASA: yes. It even runs under VMware... It's however
>>> very hackish... :)
>>
>> Cisco ASA under VMware?? :|
>
> CiscoASA is bas
Le 4 août 2010 à 15:14, Mirko Maffioli a écrit :
> 2010/7/25 Laurens Vets :
>>
>> Cisco PIX: no, Cisco ASA: yes. It even runs under VMware... It's however
>> very hackish... :)
>
> Cisco ASA under VMware?? :|
CiscoASA is based on x86, there is no reasons you cannot run this into VMWare
or Xe
2010/7/25 Laurens Vets :
>
> Cisco PIX: no, Cisco ASA: yes. It even runs under VMware... It's however
> very hackish... :)
Cisco ASA under VMware?? :|
--
Ciao
Mirko
16 matches
Mail list logo
