On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:34:23PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> On 2010-08-20 23:27, Franck Martin wrote:
> > I'm trying to debug a pesky PMTUD issue with IPv6 on Mac OS-X 10.6.
> >
> > It happens only from home, on wireless, when connected to a mac aiport
> > that does an automatic tunnel (tere
On 2010-08-21 09:18, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:34:23PM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>> On 2010-08-20 23:27, Franck Martin wrote:
>>> I'm trying to debug a pesky PMTUD issue with IPv6 on Mac OS-X 10.6.
>>>
>>> It happens only from home, on wireless, when conne
Eric J. Katanich wrote:
You disable it on the host and if no host is using it, you might as well
disable it on the router as wel. Others mentioned
some routers need to handle this in software instead of hardware, which
is obviously slower.
Most redirects are limited in their rate, so it gene
On Aug 21, 2010, at 2:11 AM, Yann GAUTERON wrote:
>
>
> 2010/8/20 Jared Mauch
>
> Personally (and as the instigator in the ipv6/6man discussion) if the
> vendors could be trusted to expose their default settings in their
> configs, i would find a default of ON to be more acceptable. As their
On Aug 21, 2010, at 10:12 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
> Eric J. Katanich wrote:
>> You disable it on the host and if no host is using it, you might as well
>> disable it on the router as wel. Others mentioned
>> some routers need to handle this in software instead of hardware, which is
>> obviously s
I appreciate the discussion.. Eric, are you reflecting messages back
to the list without additional content for a reason?
list-admin folks, could we ping eric and see what's busted?
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Eric J. Katanich wrote:
> On 08/21/2010 02:08 AM, Brandon Ross wrote:
>> On Fri,
On 8/18/10 4:20 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Mark Smith wrote:
>>> In IPv4-land I have the possibility to
>>> reconnect and get a new unrelated ip-address every time.
>>>
>>
>> They're issued by the same ISP, to they're related.
>
> Ups. Unrelated in the sens
Hi, I'm putting together a book on security*, and wanted some expert
input onto network monitoring solutions...
http://www.subspacefield.org/security/security_concepts.html
Nagios, Net-SNMP, ifgraph, cacti, OpenNMS... any others?
Any summaries of when one is better than the other?
Any suggestio
On 8/19/10 10:58 AM, Joakim Aronius wrote:
> * Joel Jaeggli (joe...@bogus.com) wrote:
>>
>> manual configuration of ip address name mappings seems like a
>> rather low priority for the average home user...
>>
>> I don't expect that will be a big activity in the future either,
>> more devices mean
Mikrotik TheDude
--
fmen...@xittel.net
On 2010-08-21, at 17:57, travis+ml-na...@subspacefield.org wrote:
> Hi, I'm putting together a book on security*, and wanted some expert
> input onto network monitoring solutions...
>
> http://www.subspacefield.org/security/security_concepts.html
>
> Nagi
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:35:50 +0200
Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
> > Web portals work fine, and honestly, it's not like you need to switch
> > subnets, either. PPPoE/A implementations work great, as they are already
> > designed to utilize radiu
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 10:32:00 -0400
Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> On Aug 21, 2010, at 10:12 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
>
> > Eric J. Katanich wrote:
> >> You disable it on the host and if no host is using it, you might as well
> >> disable it on the router as wel. Others mentioned
> >> some routers need to
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 09:12:47 -0500
Jack Bates wrote:
> Eric J. Katanich wrote:
> >
> > You disable it on the host and if no host is using it, you might as well
> > disable it on the router as wel. Others mentioned
> > some routers need to handle this in software instead of hardware, which
> >
Would a future with a ubiquitous DNSSEC deployment eliminate the market
for commercial CAs?
Would functioning DNSSEC + self signed certs be more secure/trustworthy
than our current system of trusted CAs chosen by OS/browser developers?
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 18:00, ML wrote:
> Would a future with a ubiquitous DNSSEC deployment eliminate the market
> for commercial CAs?
>
> Would functioning DNSSEC + self signed certs be more secure/trustworthy
> than our current system of trusted CAs chosen by OS/browser developers?
See Dan Ka
On Sat, 21 Aug 2010, ML wrote:
Would a future with a ubiquitous DNSSEC deployment eliminate the market
for commercial CAs?
No, but it might eliminate the cheapest certs that people might use. I'd
like my personal server to have a self-signed cert with it's fingerprint
handled via DNSSEC, bec
>
> I can remember early network printers using bootp and the assuming that
> they could use that one ip address forever. today the printer will dhcp
> and advertise it's availability in the same broadcast domain and may
> well reregister it's name in dynamic dns if possible.
Funny... I remember
17 matches
Mail list logo
