No matter how they spin it, it isn't legal. Likely he won't be touched in India
but in the U.S. he and the industry paying him would be facing a judge.
The guy is a moron. Wanna be elitist.
--Original Message--
From: Michael Painter
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Copyright Enforcement
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v1/n6/full/ncomms1063.html
Sustaining the Internet with hyperbolic mapping
Marián Boguñá, Fragkiskos Papadopoulos Dmitri Krioukov
Nature Communications 1 , Article number: 62 doi:10.1038/ncomms1063
Received 06 April 2010 Accepted 06 August 2010 Published
We've been noticing high latency for some time with Verizon (UUNET)
connections at least through the NY area.
On 09/08/2010 10:34 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
Anyone notice any issues with Cogent?
Internet Health Report showing some high latency to Verizon and a couple of
other carriers.
On Sep 9, 2010, at 6:23 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v1/n6/full/ncomms1063.html
I had read this as well last night. It's an interesting read and I was going
to send the authors some feedback as it relates to the asymmetrical nature of
BGP announcements
I'm seeing routes die on PCCW's network both in Amsterdam and
Washington DC with destinations to Asia (Hong Kong is mainly what I've
tested). However the routes are fine from Los Angeles.
Does anyone know of any fiber cuts or issues that would be causing this?
A lot of our traffic hits VZ as well and goes either to DC or points in
NY.
Been happening off and on since Labor Day weekend.
CM
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 7:09 AM, Bret Clark bcl...@spectraaccess.com wrote:
We've been noticing high latency for some time with Verizon (UUNET)
connections at
I haven't researched stand alone DS3 mux in a long time and was
wondering if anyone can recommend a DS3 Mux. I have used Adtran
before. (Long ago) The products back then worked fine on line level
but management interface was awful and if you threw too much SNMP at
it and the management interface
The adtran TA 3000 is a solid product.
--
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
http://www.mtin.net/blog xISP News
http://www.twitter.com/j2sw Follow me on Twitter
Wisp Consulting Tower Climbing Network Support
From: Jay Nakamura zeusda...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 11:33:43 -0400
To:
We use Adtran MX2820s which have been pretty reliable. They are designed
for medium density, so I am not sure if they'll be applicable to your
situation. We pull and trap a fair amount of snmp from them with no
problems.
Jay Nakamura wrote:
I haven't researched stand alone DS3 mux in a long time
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Jay Nakamura wrote:
I haven't researched stand alone DS3 mux in a long time and was
wondering if anyone can recommend a DS3 Mux. I have used Adtran
before. (Long ago) The products back then worked fine on line level
but management interface was awful and if you threw too
I can 2nd the recommendation for the MX2820 series. 9 DS3 mux per 2U
chassis w/ redundancy. Very nice product if you're needing to save space in
a rack.
mrt
-Original Message-
From: sjk [mailto:s...@sleepycatz.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 11:39 AM
To: Jay Nakamura
Cc:
On 9/9/10 9:33 AM, Jay Nakamura wrote:
I haven't researched stand alone DS3 mux in a long time and was
wondering if anyone can recommend a DS3 Mux. I have used Adtran
before. (Long ago) The products back then worked fine on line level
but management interface was awful and if you threw too
I've run into the same situations w/ the Widebanks. Controllers like to die
in the middle of the night. I also ran into a situation where a tech went
to replace a Widebank w/ an Adtran and jammed the Amphenol connectors onto
the Adtran the wrong way. That was an interesting night...
My supply
We've switched away from the CAC Widebank28s for the denser, cooler
Adtran MX2820s. Our reasons were for the exact issues explained below.
On 9/9/2010 11:03 AM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Jay Nakamura wrote:
I haven't researched stand alone DS3 mux in a long time and was
On 9/9/2010 7:24 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
I had read this as well last night. It's an interesting read and I was going
to send the authors some feedback as it relates to the asymmetrical nature of
BGP announcements impact on ASes, and seeking some of the data on the node/edge
layouts that
man.. this guy is retarded.. good luck posing your company, face and such. lol
He may get some business out of it, now that he has effectively put
out a DDoS for hire ad.
Jeff
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Beavis pfu...@gmail.com wrote:
man.. this guy is retarded.. good luck posing your company, face and such. lol
--
Jeffrey Lyon, Leadership Team
On Sep 9, 2010, at 11:43 PM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
He may get some business out of it, now that he has effectively put out a
DDoS for hire ad.
The relevant Indian authorities have been notified - my guess is that he'll
soon be receiving some interesting visitors.
;
I did a quick google search for a converter but either I'm not
understanding, or I'm not searching for the right thing.
We currently have a POS OC-3 that I would like to be able to convert
it to Ethernet, if possible.
Do such devices exist?
--
Alan Bryant | Systems Administrator
Gtek Computers
--
Michael K. Smith - CISSP, GSEC, GISP
Chief Technical Officer - Adhost Internet LLC mksm...@adhost.com
w: +1 (206) 404-9500 f: +1 (206) 404-9050
PGP: B49A DDF5 8611 27F3 08B9 84BB E61E 38C0 (Key ID: 0x9A96777D)
-Original Message-
From: Alan Bryant
They're called routers. ;)
Otherwise, your framing is completely different between those mediums,
so it's not like going from 100Base-FX ethernet to 100Base-TX ethernet!
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIEx4 (RS/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
CCDE #2009::D, JNCIE-M #153,
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Alan Bryant wrote:
We currently have a POS OC-3 that I would like to be able to convert
it to Ethernet, if possible.
Do such devices exist?
Yeah, and it's pretty sweet idea. Haven't used it myself but it seems
really nice.
That's really the question at hand here -- whether or not there's any
benefit to continuing the never ending arms race game. Some people
think there is. Others question whether anything is really being
accomplished. Certainly we're playing it out like an arms race -- ISPs
block something,
You could always use a pair of SONET ADMs on both sides with OC-3
cards and ethernet cards.
Cisco 15454 is a little big, but maybe the 15327 would have OC-3 cards...
--
Tim
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Alan Bryant
a...@gtekcommunications.com wrote:
I did a quick google search for a
He mentioned doing work (for hire) in AU and such. I think he may be in for a
rude awakening since our past experience with the Australian authorities is
they are more active chasing ddos/cyber-crimes than the U.S. Those guys pull
out all the stops to prosecute. (Which I am happy to see)
I missed this meeting/preso when it happened (yes, 5+ meetings ago)
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog45/abstracts.php?pt=MTE4OCZuYW5vZzQ1nm=nanog45
I note the talks about using spoofed source packets to do some
measurement, I didn't see anyone in the video say: But spoofing is
bad, but you
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:59:57PM -0500, Zhiyun Qian wrote:
One of the high-level findings is that we developed probing techniques
to verify that indeed most ISPs are only blocking 1) outgoing traffic
of destination port 25 instead of 2) incoming traffic with source
port 25, which means that
I can vouch for the RAD gear. Pretty simple and to the point.
On 9/9/10, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Alan Bryant wrote:
We currently have a POS OC-3 that I would like to be able to convert
it to Ethernet, if possible.
Do such devices exist?
Yeah, and
I can vouch for the RAD gear. Pretty simple and to the point.
On 9/9/10, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Alan Bryant wrote:
We currently have a POS OC-3 that I would like to be able to convert
it to Ethernet, if possible.
Do such devices exist?
Yeah, and
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 04:59:57PM -0500, Zhiyun Qian wrote:
One of the high-level findings is that we developed probing techniques
to verify that indeed most ISPs are only blocking 1) outgoing traffic
of destination port 25 instead of 2) incoming traffic with source
port 25, which means that
He mentioned doing work (for hire) in AU and such. I think he may be in for a
rude awakening since our past experience with the Australian authorities is
they are more active chasing ddos/cyber-crimes than the U.S. Those guys pull
out all the stops to prosecute. (Which I am happy to see)
I currently have several dozen ONS 15310-MA's deployed to do exactly that,
convert OC12's and OC48's into 1 or 2 gige's. Its a bookend solution, so
you need a box for each end of the circuit, but in our case the cost of the
two boxes was still cheaper than the router POS interfaces.
There are
On 9/9/2010 10:59, Alan Bryant wrote:
I did a quick google search for a converter but either I'm not
understanding, or I'm not searching for the right thing.
We currently have a POS OC-3 that I would like to be able to convert
it to Ethernet, if possible.
Do such devices exist?
By
According to the presentation they were planning on releasing a
downloadable tool by May 2009, but in searching around I found no
evidence that this was ever released.
-Ryan
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Christopher Morrow
christopher.mor...@gmail.com wrote:
I missed this meeting/preso when
Verizon had huge fiber break on Friday. It effect a large portion of the north
east. It would imagine there would left over issues
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 9, 2010, at 7:09 AM, Bret Clark bcl...@spectraaccess.com wrote:
We've been noticing high latency for some time with Verizon (UUNET)
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:29 AM, khatfi...@socllc.net wrote:
Kind of a shame.. We are likely already tracking his botnets so I almost
welcome it as well. Out of curiosity, I did pull some stats over the last 60
days and we have seen more attacks originating from the India area than we
On Sep 9, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v1/n6/full/ncomms1063.html
At first glance, this looks a bit familiar:
http://www.caida.org/research/topology/as_core_network/
---
Roland
On 2 Sep 2010, at 5:30 PM, Graham Beneke wrote:
I have been asked to investigate moving an entire network to multi-hop on all
the eBGP sessions. Basically all upstreams, downstreams and peers will eBGP
with a route reflector located in the core. This RR will be some kind of
quagga or
On 2 Sep 2010, at 8:20 PM, lorddoskias wrote:
I'm just curious - what is the largest OSPF core (in terms of number of
routers) out there?
I have seen (as a consultant, not operator) a production SP network that had
over 800 routers in the backbone area. The LSDB was rather small as the
39 matches
Mail list logo
