Re: Switches Configuration

2010-11-28 Thread Ricardo Ferreira
Sweet :) really helpful sometimes. By the way, it's Avaya now not Nortel. keep up with the good work On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:23 PM, sharon saadon sharon...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, An online Config generator for juniper Nortel and Cisco Switches ( My Develop :) ) You can see it at -

wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Randy Bush
anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has left? randy

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Andrew Mulholland
They twittered earlier claiming ddos. http://twitter.com/#!/wikileaks/status/8920530488926208 We are currently under a mass distributed denial of service attack. horse firmly bolted though, The Guardian, NYT etc all have copies apparently. thanks Andrew On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 9:34 PM,

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread James Downs
On Nov 28, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote: anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has Reported they were under attack: http://bgg.lv/h2pmsd

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Zaid Ali
I heard there are DDoS attacks on the Wikileaks site. Zaid On 11/28/10 1:34 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has left? randy

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Mark Hofman
My guess would be that it is busy. Don't know bout your region but au way it has been on the news a bit. M On 29/11/2010, at 8:35, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations state level censors trying to close the barn door after

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Jeffrey Lyon
I'm surprised it took this long for the DDoS train to pull into the station. Jeff On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 4:38 PM, James Downs e...@egon.cc wrote: On Nov 28, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote: anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable?  nations state level censors trying

RE: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-28 Thread Ryan Finnesey
Would it be fair to say they run most of the peering points within the States? I find that peering within Europe is much more open than in the States. Does the group feel that is because most of the exchange points are run as nonprofits? -Original Message- From: George Bonser

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Andrew Kirch
On 11/28/2010 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote: anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has left? randy Good riddance. The sooner someone gives Julian Assange 230gr of shut the f*** up, the better.

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread joshua.kl...@gmail.com
better late than never -- Sent from my Nokia N900 using Nokia Messaging - Original message - I'm surprised it took this long for the DDoS train to pull into the station. Jeff On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 4:38 PM, James Downs e...@egon.cc wrote: On Nov 28, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Randy

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread William Pitcock
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 16:43 -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote: I'm surprised it took this long for the DDoS train to pull into the station. Wikileaks gets DDoSed all the time. My understanding is that PRQ nullrouted the IP because the DDoS is much larger this time. William

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Jeffrey Lyon
I wouldn't have thought that PRQ would have any significant protection in place. Jeff On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:03 PM, William Pitcock neno...@systeminplace.net wrote: On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 16:43 -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote: I'm surprised it took this long for the DDoS train to pull into the

RE: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-28 Thread Aaron Wendel
According to pch they don't run most of them. I would say they run very few compared to how many there actually are. Sent via DROID on Verizon Wireless -Original message- From: Ryan Finnesey ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Sun, Nov 28, 2010 21:45:28

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread William Pitcock
On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 17:07 -0500, Jeffrey Lyon wrote: I wouldn't have thought that PRQ would have any significant protection in place. They used to host thepiratebay. I would figure that site probably got a lot of ddos attacks... William

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Wil Schultz
DOS is probably because they released some more stuff. Secret US Embassy Cables http://cablegate.wikileaks.org/ -wil On Nov 28, 2010, at 1:38 PM, James Downs wrote: On Nov 28, 2010, at 1:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote: anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations state

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Andree Toonk
Seems like they moved to Amazon a few hours ago: $ whois -h whois.bgpmon.net wikileaks.org Prefix: 46.51.128.0/18 Prefix description: Amazon EU AWS Dublin Country code:IE Origin AS: 39111 Origin AS Name: ADSI-AS Amazon EU DC AS .-- My secret spy satellite

RE: experience with equinix exchange

2010-11-28 Thread Ryan Finnesey
I was getting my info from peeringdb I have not yet looked into PCH yet. From: Aaron Wendel [mailto:aa...@wholesaleinternet.net] Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 5:10 PM To: Ryan Finnesey; nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: experience with equinix exchange According to pch they don't run most of them. 

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 16:46:25 EST, Andrew Kirch said: On 11/28/2010 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote: anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has left? randy Good riddance. The sooner someone

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Patrick W. Gilmore
On Nov 28, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Andrew Kirch wrote: On 11/28/2010 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote: anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has left? Good riddance. The sooner someone gives Julian Assange

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Jorge Amodio
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote: On Nov 28, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Andrew Kirch wrote: On 11/28/2010 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote: anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable?  nations state level censors trying to close the barn door after

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread James Jones
Remember not everyone who is on this list is a network operator and sometimes their misguided statements make it here. Do not get me wrong I wish wikileaks would disappear, but there are better ways to do this than interfering with other peoples networks. I would hope the moderators are

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Ingo Flaschberger
On Nov 28, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Andrew Kirch wrote: On 11/28/2010 4:34 PM, Randy Bush wrote: anyone know why https://www.wikileaks.org/ is not reachable? nations state level censors trying to close the barn door after the horse has left? Good riddance. The sooner someone gives Julian Assange

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Joel Esler
I've heard it's a DOS (not DDOS) according to twitter. Allegedly according to the person doing the DOS: Just so we are all straight and clear - wikileaks hit is not a 'Distributed' DoS, its a simple DoS - I dont use intermediaries or botnets. Sun Nov 16 - 15:28 EST http://twitter.com/th3j35t3r

RE: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Alex Rubenstein
Uh... huh? Just so we are all straight and clear - wikileaks hit is not a 'Distributed' DoS, its a simple DoS - I dont use intermediaries or botnets. Sun Nov 16 - 15:28 EST That would be just about 2 weeks ago.

RE: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread kmedc...@dessus.com
Uh... huh? Just so we are all straight and clear - wikileaks hit is not a 'Distributed' DoS, its a simple DoS - I dont use intermediaries or botnets. Sun Nov 16 - 15:28 EST That would be just about 2 weeks ago. Actually, the last time November 16th fell on a Sunday would have been in 2008.

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Joel Esler
I copied and pasted that from another list, however, when I brought up the twitter feed it said six hours ago (when i sent that first email). Now I don't see the tweet. shrug So, the truth may vary. Sent from my iPad On Nov 28, 2010, at 9:06 PM, kmedc...@dessus.com kmedc...@dessus.com

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Ben McGinnes
On 29/11/10 1:06 PM, kmedc...@dessus.com wrote: Uh... huh? Just so we are all straight and clear - wikileaks hit is not a 'Distributed' DoS, its a simple DoS - I dont use intermediaries or botnets. Sun Nov 16 - 15:28 EST That would be just about 2 weeks ago. Actually, the last time

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 21:06:08 -0500 kmedc...@dessus.com kmedc...@dessus.com wrote: botnets. Sun Nov 16 - 15:28 EST That would be just about 2 weeks ago. Actually, the last time November 16th fell on a Sunday would have been in 2008. So fifty-four weeks ago ... Um, really? What year

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread andrew.wallace
Hi Nanog, Some more information here - http://www.reddit.com/r/netsec/comments/ecwnn/wikileaks_hacked_ahead_of_secret_us_document/c176lcb The hacker has featured previously in a news article on his attack platform -

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Andrew Kirch
On 11/28/2010 6:11 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote: I find it distressing when Network Operators are willing to encourage DDoS'ing of a site. Any site. Especially on an operational list, where politics are specifically prohibited. You don't like Wikileaks, that's between you Julian. A DDoS

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Ken Chase
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:18:18PM -0500, Andrew Kirch said: Lets be clear here, I'm not encouraging DDoS, I'm enjoying the possibility that someone will hopefully put a jacketed hollowpoint in Assange. Andrew This is always the best way to deal with disagreement. But I think this is

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread James Jones
ROFL Sent from my iPhone On Nov 28, 2010, at 10:23 PM, Ken Chase k...@sizone.org wrote: On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:18:18PM -0500, Andrew Kirch said: Lets be clear here, I'm not encouraging DDoS, I'm enjoying the possibility that someone will hopefully put a jacketed hollowpoint in

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Adrian Chadd
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010, Ken Chase wrote: This is always the best way to deal with disagreement. But I think this is the wrong list to tender such contracts. Also, it's odd you hate DDOS's more than murder. Time to take some time off work perhaps? For the first time I'm hoping to not meet

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Andrew Kirch
On 11/28/2010 10:52 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: On Sun, Nov 28, 2010, Ken Chase wrote: This is always the best way to deal with disagreement. But I think this is the wrong list to tender such contracts. Also, it's odd you hate DDOS's more than murder. Time to take some time off work perhaps?

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Wil Schultz
Yes, we've all read your blog. Good thing this isn't an operations list or anything. -wil On Nov 28, 2010, at 8:06 PM, Andrew Kirch trel...@trelane.net wrote: On 11/28/2010 10:52 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: On Sun, Nov 28, 2010, Ken Chase wrote: This is always the best way to deal with

Re: wikileaks unreachable

2010-11-28 Thread Stefan Fouant
The one thing I found interesting was the InfoSecIsland poll where the majority of Security Practitioners polled actually supported the Jester's methods... Stefan Fouant Sorry for the top post. Sent from my iPad On Nov 28, 2010, at 9:29 PM, andrew.wallace andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com wrote: