On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Vikas Sharma wrote:
> Hi, > I am looking for the recommendation for core interfaces IP addressing
> schema
> for Ipv6. Some different views are (PE- P - PE, point to point link) as
> below -
> 1- Use Public Ipv6 with /122 and do not advertise to Internet
> 2- U
Hi everyone,
Responding to multiple messages here:
On 2/6/11 10:16 PM, John Levine wrote:
>>> What's really needed is seperate the routing slot market from the
>>> address allocation market.
>> Bingo! In fact, having an efficient market for obtaining routing of a
>> given prefix, combined with IP
> I am looking for the recommendation for core interfaces IP addressing
> schema
> for Ipv6. Some different views are (PE- P - PE, point to point link)
as
> below -
>
> 1- Use Public Ipv6 with /122 and do not advertise to Internet
> 2- Use Public Ipv6 with /127 and do not advertise to Internet
>
Hi,
I am looking for the recommendation for core interfaces IP addressing schema
for Ipv6. Some different views are (PE- P - PE, point to point link) as
below -
1- Use Public Ipv6 with /122 and do not advertise to Internet
2- Use Public Ipv6 with /127 and do not advertise to Internet
3- Use Un
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 6:54 PM, David Barak wrote:
>
>
>>From: R. Benjamin Kessler
>
>>>From: George Herbert [mailto:george.herb...@gmail.com]
>
>>>"Let's just grab 2/8, it's not routed on the Internet..."
>
>>+1
>
>>I was consulting for a financial services firm in the late '90s that was
>>acqui
Would anyone have a carrier sales contact at Global Crossing or Colt?
It is very important I get someone that is within the carrier/wholesale
group sales
>From: R. Benjamin Kessler
>>From: George Herbert [mailto:george.herb...@gmail.com]
>>"Let's just grab 2/8, it's not routed on the Internet..."
>+1
>I was consulting for a financial services firm in the late '90s that was
>acquired by a large east-coast bank; the bank's brilliant scheme >
>>From: George Herbert [mailto:george.herb...@gmail.com]
>>"Let's just grab 2/8, it's not routed on the Internet..."
+1
I was consulting for a financial services firm in the late '90s that was
acquired by a large east-coast bank; the bank's brilliant scheme was to
renumber all new acquisition
On 2/8/2011 7:58 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
It doesn't have to be a public network to need globally unique addresses.
There is NO policy requirement to use NAT or RFC-1918 for private networks.
Just a suggestion that folks be considerate of the community where they can.
I'll bet most of them woul
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Koch, Andrew wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Owen DeLong
>
>> That's as close as I think I can get to an IPv6 CIDR report
>> for the moment.
>
> Looks like Geoff has you already setup.
>
> http://www.cidr-report.org/v6/as2.0/
>
> Andy Koch
Excellent, thank
On Feb 8, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Curtis Maurand wrote:
>
>
>> Touché! That could theoretically happen. I think Apple should buy HPQDEC
>> just so they can announce 16/7 :-)
>>
>> None of the RIR blocks are going to be routed that way on purpose, though :-)
>>
>> -Randy
>>
>>
> I agree. Many o
Touché! That could theoretically happen. I think Apple should buy HPQDEC just
so they can announce 16/7 :-)
None of the RIR blocks are going to be routed that way on purpose, though :-)
-Randy
I agree. Many of those corporations would have a hard time justifying
an entire /8, even IBM.
On Feb 8, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Lynda wrote:
> On 2/8/2011 2:46 PM, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
>>> Before arin etc it was possible to request ip space and on the
>>> form specify you would not be connecting to the Internet.
>>
>> So those off net users can't complain if ARIN allocated the
>> same ra
On 2/8/2011 3:00 PM, Joshua Klubi wrote:
I want to know what measure i can do on the server to get it protected which
mysql protection
I should implement. since i can see that it might be a php or mysql
injection that is been used.
Currently I run these security measures on it.
Ubuntu UFW
Fail
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:08 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 14:59:12 PST, George Herbert said:
>
>> It's easy to say "Well, foo on them", but for those of us who provide
>> services or consulting to those who failed to follow the directions,
>> we still have to deal with it.
>
> Just remember th
On 2/8/2011 2:46 PM, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
Before arin etc it was possible to request ip space and on the
form specify you would not be connecting to the Internet.
So those off net users can't complain if ARIN allocated the
same ranges on net. Not that it's worth doing so now.
I hoped I
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 14:59:12 PST, George Herbert said:
> It's easy to say "Well, foo on them", but for those of us who provide
> services or consulting to those who failed to follow the directions,
> we still have to deal with it.
Just remember that if they *had* followed the directions, your
bil
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> I wish people would actually read RFC 1918.
>
> Category 1: hosts that do not require access to hosts in other
> enterprises or the Internet at large; hosts within
> this category may use IP addresses th
> Before arin etc it was possible to request ip space and on the
> form specify you would not be connecting to the Internet.
So those off net users can't complain if ARIN allocated the
same ranges on net. Not that it's worth doing so now.
V6, drive fast.
brandon
I wish people would actually read RFC 1918.
Category 1: hosts that do not require access to hosts in other
enterprises or the Internet at large; hosts within
this category may use IP addresses that are
unambiguous within an enterprise, b
> Right. That works great in an environment where the regulators require that
> every telco pay Neustar to maintain the LNP databases, and send all the
> updates promptly when a number is ported or disconnected.
>
> The telcos pay Neustar $300 million a year to run the database. I'm sure
> they'
KSK CEREMONY 4
The fourth KSK ceremony for the root zone took place in El Segundo,
CA, USA on Monday 2011-02-07. The Ceremony Administrator was Mehmet
Akcin. The ceremony was completed successfully.
Video from Ceremony 4 was recorded for audit purposes. Video and
associated audit materials will
>The way LNP works is a good example of PSTN style routing scaling. ...
>When a phone call is made, a TCAP query is launched by the originating
>switch to a set of STPs that then route it to an LNP database, that has
>a full list of every ported number, and its LRN, and a few other tidbits
>of
It is a LAMP. Stack
Joshua
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 8, 2011, at 12:21, William Warren
wrote:
> On 2/7/2011 1:23 PM, Joshua William Klubi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I run a web-server based on ubuntu server and the LAMP stack.
>> I used Ubuntu's UFW firewall model and have enabled only Web and SS
On 2/8/2011 7:41 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
It is PLL LNB, one carrier, we are using full transponder 36 Mhz. There is
almost no other users on this satellite (inclined more than 1.5 degree), and
other carriers center frequency 100Mhz away.
Since no one else will, "I blame solar flares!
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Derek J. Balling wrote:
>
> On Feb 5, 2011, at 8:14 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
>> I have told a hotel they need to install equipment that supports RA
>> guard as I've checked out. This was a hotel that only offered IPv4.
>
> Wow... Could that be any more of a waste of
On 2/8/2011 7:25 AM, Sam Stickland wrote:
I've worked in plenty of places where registered address was used on private
interconnections between organisations to avoid overlaps, but never announced
globally.
There's no such thing as "globally" anyway.
Your view of the Internet routing table !=
On 2/8/2011 7:21 AM, William Warren wrote:
On 2/7/2011 1:23 PM, Joshua William Klubi wrote:
Hi,
I run a web-server based on ubuntu server and the LAMP stack.
I used Ubuntu's UFW firewall model and have enabled only Web and SSH
ports.
Namely port 80 and port 22 only.
Unfortunately once a whil
On 02/08/2011 11:01 AM, Neil Harris wrote:
They did indeed, but they did it by centrally precomputing and then
downloading centrally-built routing tables to each exchange, with
added statically-configured routing between telco provider domains,
and then doing step-by-step call setup, with add
Morning all,
From all reports the recent DNS BoF at the Miami NANOG was well received. As a
follow up, I'd like to the a moment to let everybody know about the upcoming
DNS-OARC Workshop March 13th and 14th in San Francisco durning the ICANN 40
meeting. Both days are open to the public but at
Owen DeLong writes:
> I fully expect the record to be placed soon and it looks like that
> is the last remaining hurdle. Once that is done, I will pay my dues.
There have been records in the zone for ages. I don't have a
problem with you calling out our oversight on a public mailing
On 07/02/11 14:25, Jamie Bowden wrote:
It would help if we weren't shipping the routing equivalent of the pre
DNS /etc/hosts all over the network (it's automated, but it's still the
equivalent). There has to be a better way to handle routing information
than what's currently being done. The old
They route well as compared to some in the same league.
Latency is low. They must not over subscribe or run too congested.
Paths in and out of PTLDOR appear fairly optimal. Have no data on other geo's.
NOC support could be a bit more proactive.
-b
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Christopher Wolf
I've worked in plenty of places where registered address was used on private
interconnections between organisations to avoid overlaps, but never announced
globally.
S
On 8 Feb 2011, at 14:35, gb10hkzo-na...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>> Hint: even IPs not pingable from the Internet are being used. Not
Before arin etc it was possible to request ip space and on the form specify you
would not be connecting to the Internet.
Jared Mauch
On Feb 8, 2011, at 9:35 AM, gb10hkzo-na...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
>> Hint: even IPs not pingable from the Internet are being used. Not
>> everyone is an ISP/Webhost
> Hint: even IPs not pingable from the Internet are being used. Not
> everyone is an ISP/Webhoster ... with public services.
I thought that was why we have RFC1918 ?
At 13:59 08/02/2011 +0200, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 01:42:42 George Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Ryan Wilkins wrote:
> > On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
> >> Hi Denys
> >> I doubt it's intentional jamming since I've had the sa
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 15:46:31 TR Shaw wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 7:34 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:41:29 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:18:59 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On
On Feb 8, 2011, at 7:34 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:41:29 Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:18:59 Adrian Chadd wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> I try t
I'm in San Diego and at my last company we had to replace all 2.4Ghz wireless
with 5Ghz when we started getting hammered across that range by a signal about
90db higher than our APs by something. We were never able to identify what it
was, but the signal looked odd and an ex-navy coworker said
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:41:29 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:18:59 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > > > I try to install C-Band bandpass filter, no effect at all, so it
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:34:58 TR Shaw wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 6:59 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 February 2011 01:42:42 George Herbert wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Ryan Wilkins wrote:
> >>> On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
> Hi D
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:18:59 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > > I try to install C-Band bandpass filter, no effect at all, so it is
> > > in-band
> > >
> > > interference. Putting foil (yes i
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 14:18:59 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> > I try to install C-Band bandpass filter, no effect at all, so it is
> > in-band
> >
> > interference. Putting foil (yes i try almost everything) near LNB doesn't
> > affect interferen
On Feb 8, 2011, at 6:59 AM, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 February 2011 01:42:42 George Herbert wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Ryan Wilkins wrote:
>>> On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
Hi Denys
I doubt it's intentional jamming since I've had th
On 2/7/2011 1:23 PM, Joshua William Klubi wrote:
Hi,
I run a web-server based on ubuntu server and the LAMP stack.
I used Ubuntu's UFW firewall model and have enabled only Web and SSH ports.
Namely port 80 and port 22 only.
Unfortunately once a while some guys get to inject some content onto ou
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
> I try to install C-Band bandpass filter, no effect at all, so it is in-band
> interference. Putting foil (yes i try almost everything) near LNB doesn't
> affect interference level too.
Can you get access to some kind of spectrum analyser kit
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 01:42:42 George Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Ryan Wilkins wrote:
> > On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Michael Painter wrote:
> >> Hi Denys
> >> I doubt it's intentional jamming since I've had the same problem.
> >> Aegis radar is very high power in full r
48 matches
Mail list logo
