--- On Sun, 2/20/11, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Oh, I expect CGN/LSN to be connectivity of last resort, no
> question.
Ok, so let's just deploy it and not even try to fix it? Even when it is a
required functionality for IPv6-only hosts to access the IPv4 domain? That'll
go down real well with end-us
On 2011-02-18 15:37, Jeffrey Lyon wrote:
I am looking for a switch with a minimum of 12 X 10GE ports on it,
>> that can has routing protocol support and can do GRE in hardware.
Yes, Juniper EX4500.
Interesting:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos10.4/topics/reference/general/ex-seri
Extreme 650, but not sure of the gre in hardware req. These are awesome
switches, bgp support, VSS like clustering, and many other nice features.
G
- Original Message -
From: Łukasz Bromirski [mailto:luk...@bromirski.net]
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2011 10:04 AM
To: nanog@nanog.or
If the network contact at Quadranet could contact me off list, I'd
appreciate it. This is concerning the continual spamming of a proxy server I
run from multiple hosts at Quadranet.
Thomas York
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Good Day,
I have always been exposed to one vendor only so i can never compare but I
am curious to know what every one here have seen in their lives on the
below:
1) Which vendor has more bugs than others, what are the top 3
2) Who is doing a better job fixing them
3) What do you consider is a go
Good Day,
I have always been exposed to one vendor only so i can never compare but I
am curious to know what every one here have seen in their lives on the
below:
1) Which vendor has more bugs than others, what are the top 3 ?
2) Who is doing a better job fixing/handling these bugs overall
3)
Is there anyone on the list who can comment, on- or off-list, for-attribution
or not, on what kind of job Verizon Wireless has done provisioning the data
backbone for their new LTE "4G"[1] rollout?
Given the fact that it is at 700MHz and will therefore have *substantially*
better building penetrat
On Feb 20, 2011, at 3:27 AM, Zed Usser wrote:
> --- On Sun, 2/20/11, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> Oh, I expect CGN/LSN to be connectivity of last resort, no
>> question.
> Ok, so let's just deploy it and not even try to fix it? Even when it is a
> required functionality for IPv6-only hosts to access
>Is scaling of rrdtool still a problem for you with rrdcached?
This helps on some of my network/server related graphs, but this data is not
exactly time based (well timestamps are recorded, but not at cyclic
intervals). Plus the dataset is extremely large (100's of millions or rows
already in mySQ
Ugh they're nice except for the power supplies becoming a fireball & they're
high dos rate. Ymmv
Tammy
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 20, 2011, at 8:46, Greg Whynott wrote:
> Extreme 650, but not sure of the gre in hardware req. These are awesome
> switches, bgp support, VSS like clustering,
Gah that should have read doa rate.
@#$@#$ing autocorrect.
sorry about that.
- Original Message -
> From: "Tammy A Wisdom"
> To: "Greg Whynott"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2011 11:22:27 AM
> Subject: Re: Switch with 10 Gig and GRE support in hardware.
>
> Ugh they
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 18:05:44 +0200, Kasper Adel said:
(Disclaimer - I've never filed a bug report with Cisco or Juniper,
but I've spent 3 decades filing bugs with almost everybody else in
the computer industry, it seems... Questions like the ones you asked
are almost always pointless unless the a
> On 2/18/11 6:30 AM, "Matt Newsom" wrote:
>
> >I am looking for a switch with a minimum of 12 X
10GE
> >ports on it, that can has routing protocol support and can do GRE in
> >hardware. Does anyone have a suggestion that might fit. Keep in mind
I
> am
> >looking for something in
> > 2) Who is doing a better job fixing them
>
> Again, see the above discussion of severity. If a vendor is good
about
> fixing the real show-stoppers in a matter of hours or days, but has a
> huge backlog of fixes for minor things, is that better or worse than a
> vendor that fixes half of bot
Thanks Valdis.
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 9:43 PM, wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 18:05:44 +0200, Kasper Adel said:
>
> (Disclaimer - I've never filed a bug report with Cisco or Juniper,
> but I've spent 3 decades filing bugs with almost everybody else in
> the computer industry, it seems... Questio
- Original Message -
> From: "Jim Reid"
> On 21 Feb 2011, at 01:44, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
> > So: people-who-do: is my supposition/assertion above correct? If it is,
> > is it reasonable to draw from it the inference that I do (IE, that Jim is
> > correct and Brandon's not)?
>
> It's mo
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Leigh Porter
wrote:
>
...
>
> IPv6 only hosts are a good thing to speed up v6 adoption. Nothing like a good
> carrot to get the donkeys moving.
>
> --
> Leigh
>
Well, speaking of carrots...a few years back we _did_ have
http://ipv6experiment.com/
though, unfortu
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Max Pierson wrote:
> Anyone out there using something other than rrdtool for creating graphs?? I
> have a project that will need a trend taken, and unfortunately rrdtool
> doesn't fit the bill. All of the scripting, data collection,
> database archival, etc will be
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:24 AM, Zed Usser wrote:
> Basic Internet services will work (web browsing, email, Facebook,
> Youtube,...), but:
> - Less torrenting
> - Less Netflix watching
> - Less FTP downloads
> - Less video streaming in general (webcams, etc.)
> You might take a hit on online gami
19 matches
Mail list logo
