* Crist Clark:
Any large, well funded national-level intelligence agency
almost certainly has keys to a valid CA distributed with
any browser or SSL package. It would be trivial for the US
Gov't (and by extension, the whole AUSCANNZUKUS intelligence
community) to simply form a shell company
On 3/29/11 10:18 , Wil Schultz wschu...@bsdboy.com wrote:
I'm attempting to find out information on the SEO implications of testing
ipv6 out.
3) ??? Any others that I haven't thought of ???
So basically I'd love to set up some sites for ipv6.domain.com via 6to4
as a phase one, and at some
Hello,
Have a Cisco 3560 running flash:/c3560-ipbasek9-mz.122-55.SE1.bin. Been
running at 20% CPU since we started it:
[image: plf-access - CPU Usage]
The switch is completely layer-2... basic configuration. CPU utilization is
soley based on a single process:
plf-access#sh proc cpu sorted
You mean the RedEarth process?
RedEarth Tx Mana: Microprocessor communication process
From:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750/software/troub
leshooting/cpu_util.html
--
Leigh Porter
UK Broadband
-Original Message-
From: Joe Renwick
Hi Joe,
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 03:52 -0700, Joe Renwick wrote:
plf-access#sh proc cpu sorted
CPU utilization for five seconds: 27%/0%; one minute: 25%; five minutes: 24%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
41 232891470 1072247 217210 20.12% 18.99%
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:59:21 +0100, Leigh Porter
leigh.por...@ukbroadband.com wrote:
You mean the RedEarth process?
I suspect he meant the SFF8472 process, using 20% of CPU...
plf-access#sh proc cpu sorted
CPU utilization for five seconds: 27%/0%; one minute: 25%; five minutes:
24%
PID
Hi Mike,
iBGP is what most ISPs would use for that, for customers with dynamic IPs
simply aggregate their addresses on the BRAS, if you have several thousand IPs
you really don't want them in your IGP
Regards,
Ido.
-Original Message-
From: Mike [mailto:mike-na...@tiedyenetworks.com]
Dears:
As in IEEE 802.3 clause 46, in 10G Ethernet, RS and PCS may use XGMII
interface to inter-connect.
XGMII interface is a 32-bit wide, transmit receive data path, working on
frequency of 156.25HZ. So, for transmit direction, the total transmit rate
should be 32*156.25=5Gbps, how 10G works
check your xgmii specs...
it's ddr so there is a bit on both clock rise and fall.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10_Gigabit_Media_Independent_Interface
On 3/29/11 5:27 AM, yifeng zhou wrote:
Dears:
As in IEEE 802.3 clause 46, in 10G Ethernet, RS and PCS may use XGMII
interface to
Thanks Joel. Now i can understand :)
2011/3/29 Joel Jaeggli joe...@bogus.com
check your xgmii specs...
it's ddr so there is a bit on both clock rise and fall.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10_Gigabit_Media_Independent_Interface
On 3/29/11 5:27 AM, yifeng zhou wrote:
Dears:
As in
- Original Message -
From: John Kristoff j...@cymru.com
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:14:18 -0400 (EDT)
Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Oh hell; now we'll *never* lay the ghost of packet switching was
invented to create a nuclear-war-survivable network.
Maybe you're confusing the
misguided idea of someone who's way too invested in IPv4 and hasn't made
any necessary plans or steps to implement IPv6
Lack of planning or good business?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12859585
Raymond Macharia
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:15 AM, Jima na...@jima.tk wrote:
On 3/7/2011
it goes to show that the greatest and I must add unsung heroes have the
greatest impact on our lives even when we do not know it.
Regards
Raymond Macharia
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
George Bonser gbon...@seven.com wrote:
What bothers me is that most companies are now going to be forced to
purchase .xxx domains simply to keep someone else from buying it and
sullying the company's image.
Who is forcing them?
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch d...@dotat.at http://dotat.at/
John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
I suppose one could argue in both cases that the existence of any
registrations at all shows support, in which case .MUSEUM is a
rousing success, too.
My favourite sTLD from the 2004 round is .post
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch d...@dotat.at http://dotat.at/
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:25:35 BST, Tony Finch said:
George Bonser gbon...@seven.com wrote:
What bothers me is that most companies are now going to be forced to
purchase .xxx domains simply to keep someone else from buying it and
sullying the company's image.
Who is forcing them?
Do a
On Mar 29, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
George Bonser gbon...@seven.com wrote:
What bothers me is that most companies are now going to be forced to
purchase .xxx domains simply to keep someone else from buying it and
sullying the company's image.
Who is forcing them?
Their
On 3/29/11 9:32 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On Mar 29, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
George Bonser gbon...@seven.com wrote:
What bothers me is that most companies are now going to be forced to
purchase .xxx domains simply to keep someone else from buying it and
sullying the
On 29 Mar 2011, at 00:18, Wil Schultz wrote:
I'm attempting to find out information on the SEO implications of testing
ipv6 out.
A couple of concerns that come to mind are:
1) www.domain.com and ipv6.domain.com are serving the exact same content.
Typical SEO standards are to only
On Mar 29, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
On 3/29/11 10:18 , Wil Schultz wschu...@bsdboy.com wrote:
I'm attempting to find out information on the SEO implications of testing
ipv6 out.
3) ??? Any others that I haven't thought of ???
So basically I'd love to set up some
Slightly off-topic so apologies:
Looking at hosting some servers in Hong Kong, to serve the APAC region. Our
client is worried that this may slow things down in their Australia region,
and are wondering whether hosting the servers in an Australian data-centre
would be a better option.
Does
On 3/29/2011 at 12:30 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@bfk.de wrote:
* Crist Clark:
Any large, well funded national-level intelligence agency
almost certainly has keys to a valid CA distributed with
any browser or SSL package. It would be trivial for the US
Gov't (and by extension, the whole
pccw's lookingglass
http://lookingglass.pccwglobal.com/
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Robert Lusby nano...@gmail.com wrote:
Slightly off-topic so apologies:
Looking at hosting some servers in Hong Kong, to serve the APAC region. Our
client is worried that this may slow things down in
Did you had a look at the traceroute page from Telstra ?
http://www.telstra.net/cgi-bin/trace
Regards,
Erik
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 06:33:07PM +0100, Robert Lusby wrote:
Looking at hosting some servers in Hong Kong, to serve the APAC region. Our
client is worried that this may slow things down in their Australia region,
and are wondering whether hosting the servers in an Australian data-centre
would
Well, you don't need to wait for .xxx you have things like
http://www.radio.co.ck/
On 3/30/11 3:25 , Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
George Bonser gbon...@seven.com wrote:
What bothers me is that most companies are now going to be forced to
purchase .xxx domains simply to keep someone else
Or http://www.budget.co.ck/ ..
On 3/30/11 3:25 , Tony Finch d...@dotat.at wrote:
George Bonser gbon...@seven.com wrote:
What bothers me is that most companies are now going to be forced to
purchase .xxx domains simply to keep someone else from buying it and
sullying the company's image.
Who
So thanks to all for the help. It was an SFP. Here is CPU with bad SFP:
plf-access#
plf-access#sh proc cpu sorted
CPU utilization for five seconds: 11%/0%; one minute: 18%; five minutes: 21%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
41 237737055 1095169
Ingen,
How did you know this? And I quote Well, I have no direct experience with
the 3560, but SFF-8472 is a spec that includes diagnosting monitoring of
SFPs Really am I missing some secret search engine? Is google not the
answer? Please do let me know because if it was from an online
Is there from AS1273 out there that would be willing to talk to me about a bgp
problem we are observing?
(Or 1239, since your routes are being sent as a customer route by 1273)
Thanks,
- Jared
I wonder if you were seeing 14% CPU over 5min avg BECAUSE the SFP supported
DOM or was it a bug due to DOM. In other words, maybe the fact that the SFP
supported DOM just took up a bit more CPU due to the diagnostic function. Is
it normal I guess is what I'm wondering...
-J
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011
31 matches
Mail list logo
