The RIPE NCC is running their Resource Certification system for a couple of
months now, and we've got quite a number of prefixes covered by ROAs in the
repository by now. So I decided to have a look at how people are creating their
ROAs and in particular how the 'Maximum Length' feature is
If the number of prefixes are small, and your on Cisco gear, take a look at
IP SLA as an option for manipulating static routes. Basically it'll allow
you to setup a probe, and based on the result of the probe, dynamically
populate a given static route in the routing table or not.
David.
On
On 20/04/2011, at 11:43 AM, Martin Millnert wrote:
Either way, there certainly IS a place in networks for Toredo services,
since SO
MANY devices for the CPE end of the connectivity equation still have
zero support for IPv6.
If you are prepared to tolerate a connection failure rate in the
The better solution to that problem is to get additional 6to4 relays deployed
closer to India. Perhaps encouraging Tata to take some leadership in that area,
for example.
I do not believe that the opening of the Comcast relays will harm BGP best path
selection for the 6to4 prefix except in
Hi All,
Can anybody point me to a documented case where a bug in Cisco IOS has taken a
whole network down ?
Regards and thanks in advance
Eric Parsonage
I submitted my objects April 11. the mtrner object needs to be created by the
db-admin. I realize this is a volunteer thing. Could I help out or could the
people that are helping out look at adding my record? I need to setup some
peering relationships. I'd prefer to support open communities
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Bret Palsson wrote:
I submitted my objects April 11. the mtrner object needs to be created by the
db-admin. I realize this is a volunteer thing. Could I help out or could the
people that are helping out look at adding my record? I need to setup some
peering
Looking forward to seeing you all in Denver.
Dave
(for the NANOG PC)
___
NANOG-announce mailing list
nanog-annou...@nanog.org
https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-announce
Hi Eric,
You might want to read up on :
http://labs.ripe.net/Members/erik/ripe-ncc-and-duke-university-bgp-experimen
t
The cisco case involved :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b441
1f.shtml
Short detail from the Cisco site:
This
Anyone know what's up with dishnetwork.com? www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com
also reports it as being down.
---
Andy Ringsmuth
7215 Dorchester Court
Lincoln, NE 68521
(402) 304-0083
andyr...@inebraska.com
It's up for me (Michigan).
-Original Message-
From: Andy Ringsmuth [mailto:andyr...@inebraska.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 11:04 AM
To: outages; NANOG list
Subject: dishnetwork.com down?
Anyone know what's up with dishnetwork.com? www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com
also reports
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:30:44AM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Bret Palsson wrote:
I submitted my objects April 11. the mtrner object needs to be
created by the db-admin. I realize this is a volunteer thing. Could
I help out or could the people that are helping out look
Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 10:05 -0500, Richard A Steenbergen a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:30:44AM -0400, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Bret Palsson wrote:
I submitted my objects April 11. the mtrner object needs to be
created by the db-admin. I realize this is a
Hi,
Not sure this is the right place to ask, but I see lots of pl to
www.google.com from my servers. Anyone else that have the same problem?
Host Loss%
Snt Last Avg Best Wrst StDev
6. ae-92-92.csw4.SanJose1.Level3.net
Really... Please provide support? Below is the response I got on April 11. I
don't need a tutorial on how to use the service...
#ERROR: New maintainers must be added by a DB administrator.
Forwarding new request to db-ad...@altdb.net
If it takes weeks for a maintainer record to be added, the
yes, from SF - Postini and Google.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Andreas Petersson andr...@sbin.se wrote:
Hi,
Not sure this is the right place to ask, but I see lots of pl to
www.google.com from my servers. Anyone else that have the same problem?
Host
NANOG Community,
As many of you know, NANOG has been taken over by a new membership-based
non-profit corporation, NewNOG, Inc. Things are going well so far. The NANOG
Intellectual Property transfer is moving along nicely. We've been signing up
lots of sponsors for the Denver meeting coming
We're seeing the same packet loss from SF.
1. ge-0-3.core1.sf2p.weebly.net
0.0% 0.3 3.9 0.3 186.5 19.4
2. vlan118.car2.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net
0.7% 1.1 12.9 0.5 184.4 35.3
3. ae-2-4.bar2.SanFrancisco1.Level3.net
0.0% 27.5 3.9 0.4 63.2 11.8
4.
Mr. Delong,
I am simply trying to explain that running a 6to4 on your network is a good
idea, however advertising the anycast prefix to other networks has some risk,
especially if you're experiencing problems with your Internet peerings.
Hopefully Comcast will upgrade its capacity soon. I
I've waited 9 days which isn't a lot compared to others I've talked with who
have waited many weeks or have had no response at all.
I also realize people have lives and can't do things on demand when they are
a volunteer. However for a service to be a service responsibility must lie
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Bret Palsson wrote:
I submitted my objects April 11. the mtrner object needs to be created
by the db-admin. I realize this is a volunteer thing. Could I help out
or could the people that are helping out look at adding my record? I
need to setup some peering relationships.
Doug,
I am aware of the drafts you cited earlier, as Mikael mentions below the
existence of the same will not result in 6to4 being turned off
automatically or immediately. This process will likely take years.
Please note the goal here is not to make 6to4 great, like many others we
hope to see
Dear Eric,
Can anybody point me to a documented case where a bug in Cisco IOS has taken a
whole network down ?
The ripe experiment is really a great one.
A little bit older one, but bigger - took down the whole internet:
1) http://markmail.org/message/nmlyif7oycohcr22
2)
On 04/20/2011 10:54, Brzozowski, John wrote:
Doug,
I am aware of the drafts you cited earlier, as Mikael mentions below the
existence of the same will not result in 6to4 being turned off
automatically or immediately. This process will likely take years.
I was going to let this go, but after
1. Yes.
2. Perhaps, but, it's minimal internal risk and the risk it poses to others
can be mitigated by those others installing appropriate services
on their own networks.
3. We agree here as well.
Owen
On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:33 AM, Bhoomi Jain wrote:
Mr. Delong,
On Apr 20, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 04/20/2011 10:54, Brzozowski, John wrote:
Doug,
I am aware of the drafts you cited earlier, as Mikael mentions below the
existence of the same will not result in 6to4 being turned off
automatically or immediately. This process will
On Apr 20, 2011, at 3:50 03PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Apr 20, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 04/20/2011 10:54, Brzozowski, John wrote:
Doug,
I am aware of the drafts you cited earlier, as Mikael mentions below the
existence of the same will not result in 6to4 being turned off
On 04/20/2011 12:50, Owen DeLong wrote:
Turnning off the servers will not reduce the brokenness of 6to4, it will
increase it.
Depends on your definitions of increase and broken. If all the
relays disappeared tomorrow then the failure rate would be 100%, sure.
But that would mean a single,
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:09 PM, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 04/20/2011 12:50, Owen DeLong wrote:
Turnning off the servers will not reduce the brokenness of 6to4, it will
increase it.
Depends on your definitions of increase and broken. If all the relays
The best way to make 6to4 diminish has always been and still remains:
Deploy Native IPv6 Now.
That's a plan and a necessity at this point, but, execution is still
somewhat lagging.
Of course, Comcast *is* deploying native IPv6; see, for example,
A little bit older one, but bigger - took down the whole internet:
for a small value of whole internet
same for ripe/duke experiment gone bad
randy
On 04/20/2011 04:44 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
The best way to make 6to4 diminish has always been and still remains:
Deploy Native IPv6 Now.
That's a plan and a necessity at this point, but, execution is still somewhat
lagging.
Of course, Comcast *is* deploying native IPv6; see, for
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 20, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Jim Gettys j...@freedesktop.org wrote:
On 04/20/2011 04:44 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
The best way to make 6to4 diminish has always been and still remains:
Deploy Native IPv6 Now.
That's a plan and a necessity at this point, but, execution
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 16:09, Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
On 04/20/2011 12:50, Owen DeLong wrote:
Turnning off the servers will not reduce the brokenness of 6to4, it will
increase it.
Depends on your definitions of increase and broken. If all the relays
disappeared tomorrow
I'm interested in any evidence (even anecdotal) that general Internet usage
(and more importantly, link utilization) has increased at higher rates in the
last 6-12 months than in previous periods. Any graphs or otherwise would be
greatly appreciated. The purpose is for an internal research
On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:35 PM, Curran, David wrote:
I'm interested in any evidence (even anecdotal) that general Internet usage
(and more importantly, link utilization) has increased at higher rates in the
last 6-12 months than in previous periods. Any graphs or otherwise would be
greatly
If it's a true research project, wouldn't you really be interested in both
evidence for/against? :-)
Just my 2c here,
Adrian
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:35 PM, Curran, David wrote:
I'm interested in any evidence (even anecdotal) that general
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:35 PM, Curran, David wrote:
I'm interested in any evidence (even anecdotal) that general Internet usage
(and more importantly, link utilization) has increased at higher rates in
the last 6-12
We use Sun Netra.
Thanks,
Jess
39 matches
Mail list logo
