Re: Verisign Internet Defence Network

On 5/31/11 10:26 PM, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > > My biggest gripe was their SLA - or lack of one. Back in Dec 2009 I > forced them to start writing an SLA which they had not thought of, which > back then showed an immaturity of service. Things might be different > now. Verisign then took the view

Re: Verisign Internet Defence Network

At 10:25 30/05/2011 -0400, Jim Mercer wrote: My knowledge is from 1.5 years ago when I compared Verisign, Prolexic, Akamai and others so things may have changed since then. VeriSign claim that they are servicing their own network globally which has performed with zero down time over the last

RE: Yahoo and IPv6

Going to http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/ipv6/ and hitting "Start IPv6 Test" I get: "Your system will continue to work for you on World IPv6 day. However, we found that your server only supports IPv4 at this time. You'll simply continue to use IPv4 to reach your favorite web sites." Netalyzr (

IPv6 day meetup in NYC?

This is now set for 7pm, June 8, at NYU. An informal meeting (no webcast) followed by a visit to a nearby drinking establishment. http://isoc-ny.org/p2/?p=2149 j -- --- Joly MacFie 218 565 9365 Skype:pun

RE: VeriSign Internet Defense Network

> -Original Message- > From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.li...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 3:31 PM > Subject: Re: VeriSign Internet Defense Network > > also, note that VerizonBusiness ddos-mitigation service was > no-call-required, just send the right community on a con

RE: VeriSign Internet Defense Network

> -Original Message- > From: Deepak Jain [mailto:dee...@ai.net] > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 3:07 PM > Subject: RE: VeriSign Internet Defense Network > > Let's not ignore the value of DNS with a short ttl time. It may not be > "as quick" as a BGP adjustment, but serves to provide a buttre

Re: VeriSign Internet Defense Network

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Deepak Jain wrote: > Let's not ignore the value of DNS with a short ttl time. It may not be "as > quick" as a BGP adjustment, but serves to provide a buttressed front-end IP > that can restore service "instantly" [faster than getting someone on the > phone to co

RE: VeriSign Internet Defense Network

Let's not ignore the value of DNS with a short ttl time. It may not be "as quick" as a BGP adjustment, but serves to provide a buttressed front-end IP that can restore service "instantly" [faster than getting someone on the phone to coordinate the change, etc]. Disclaimer: We provide a service

Re: Deploying IPv6 globally

On May 31, 2011, at 8:36 AM, eric clark wrote: > Many North American based organizations operate with their ARIN issued BGP > AS distributed globally. > > When I discussed obtaining IPv6 space from ARIN a few years ago, they told > me to submit an individual request for each of my sites (and th

RE: Deploying IPv6 globally

I have done this several times for NA orgs with global sites with ARIN and for EU orgs with global sites with RIPE. ARIN were fine, RIPE just excluded any non-RIPE governed locations from the calculation criteria, however they were granted on all counts. John __

Re: Deploying IPv6 globally

At a previous company my pi assigment request included our overseas sites. the bulk of the assignment and the business unit making the request were based in north america. resulting request was for a /43. joel On May 31, 2011, at 8:36 AM, eric clark wrote: > Many North American based organizat

Deploying IPv6 globally

Many North American based organizations operate with their ARIN issued BGP AS distributed globally. When I discussed obtaining IPv6 space from ARIN a few years ago, they told me to submit an individual request for each of my sites (and they'd issue a /48 or larger based on the site). This is the