RE: best practices for management nets in IPv6

Yes sorry Exchange 2010 - OCS, Lync, Exchange UM - these require IPv4 Cheers Ryan -Original Message- From: Frank Bulk [mailto:frnk...@iname.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:34 AM To: Ryan Finnesey Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: best practices for management nets in IPv6 Which ver

RE: best practices for management nets in IPv6

Which version of Exchange are you talking about, and can you share what about it doesn't support IPv6? Frank -Original Message- From: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:ryan.finne...@harrierinvestments.com] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 10:56 PM To: Doug Barton; Tim Franklin Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subjec

RE: best practices for management nets in IPv6

We keep running into problem with our IPv6 roll out. I just confirmed today that Exchange does not fully support IPv6 Cheers Ryan -Original Message- From: Doug Barton [mailto:do...@dougbarton.us] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 4:59 PM To: Tim Franklin Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: best

Re: 32 and directallocate

On 7/18/11 7:02 PM, Deric Kwok wrote: > Hi > > I have the following questions. hope you can help > > 1/ In ipv6 /32. ls it same as ipv4 /32 No. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ipv4 and then read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classless_Inter-Domain_Routing Contrast with: http://en.wikipedia.or

32 and directallocate

Hi I have the following questions. hope you can help 1/ In ipv6 /32. ls it same as ipv4 /32 2/ If our company is using our ISP AS and their IP for providing internert ds line service, can we transfer those ip from them to us when we change other provider? 3/What is meaning directallcoate? Than

Re: Google DNS just disappeared

If you want to be able to ask Googlers directly on issues like this, you might try Google+. I am trying to spam, it is just that they are all available on there. Here is something Scoble posted the other day: I just spent an hour talking with a Google exec about + and I came away > with a few thi

Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6

On 07/18/2011 06:12, Tim Franklin wrote: >> You can also use IPv6 privacy extensions (by default on Windows 7), >> see rfc4941. For Linux, you can also enable it, which is not a >> default. > > In the context of "addresses I'm using to manage kit", having devices > randomly renumber themselves at

Re: [lisp] Anybody can participate in the IETF (Was: Why is IPv6 broken?)

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote: > Let me make sure I understand your point here. You don't seem to be > disagreeing with the assertion that for most sites (even things like very > large universities, etc), their 'working set' (of nodes they communicate) > with will be much sm

Fwd: [arin-announce] Abuse Contact to be Mandatory per Policy 2010-14

This is a significant change that all NANOG folks should be aware of... FYI, /John Begin forwarded message: From: ARIN mailto:i...@arin.net>> Date: July 18, 2011 11:31:45 AM EDT To: arin-annou...@arin.net Subject: [arin-announce] Ab

Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 13:12, Tim Franklin wrote: >> You can also use IPv6 privacy extensions (by default on Windows 7), >> see rfc4941. For Linux, you can also enable it, which is not a >> default. > > In the context of "addresses I'm using to manage kit", having devices > randomly renumber them

Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6

> You can also use IPv6 privacy extensions (by default on Windows 7), > see rfc4941. For Linux, you can also enable it, which is not a > default. In the context of "addresses I'm using to manage kit", having devices randomly renumber themselves at regular intervals does *not* sound like it's goin

Re: best practices for management nets in IPv6

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:22 PM, James Harr wrote: > If you really really need address obfuscation, you can still do NAT, > but NAT from public addresses to public a public address or pool of Well, You can also use IPv6 privacy extensions (by default on Windows 7), see rfc4941. For Linux, you ca