Re: Disappointing ARIN - A great advertisement for the USA ?

> I hate to beat/stab a dead horsey, but I found this by happenstance: > > > > which describes some of the differences between RWS output and > traditional output. > > For the scripty-minded folks out there: > $ wget -O - -q http://whois.

Re: Disappointing ARIN - A great advertisement for the USA ?

I hate to beat/stab a dead horsey, but I found this by happenstance: which describes some of the differences between RWS output and traditional output. For the scripty-minded folks out there: $ wget -O - -q http://whois.arin.net/rest/ip/1

Re: Anyone from Covad here?

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 07:20:04PM -0700, Robert Glover wrote: > Covad (or should I say Megapath now..), > > You have DNS servers that are failing to resolve anything at this time: > > 64.105.172.26 and 64.105.172.27 are both failing. > > This is a Bad Thing as these are the servers that the maj

Anyone from Covad here?

Covad (or should I say Megapath now..), You have DNS servers that are failing to resolve anything at this time: 64.105.172.26 and 64.105.172.27 are both failing. This is a Bad Thing as these are the servers that the majority of our Covad customers use. Sincerely, Bobby Glover Director of Inf

Re: routing issue for verizon dsl customers in western massachusetts

On Sep 15, 2011, at 4:52 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: I wasn't aware verizon implemented CGN already... way to be a 'first mover' in this field verizon! Maybe they are tying it out here in the sticks, where the glitches only hit single-digit numbers of users? (Though, I'd think if it was

Re: ouch..

Now just where would the fun in THAT be? ;) Scott On 9/14/11 11:00 AM, James Jones wrote: > Funny they forget to mention that Cisco doesn't have 100g any where. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 14, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Leigh Porter > wrote: > >> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Always L

Re: ouch..

Microsoft had a direct dig at vmware recently (good video IMO) http://vmlimited.ctp.trafficmgr.com/ Matt On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Jima wrote: > > Once upon a time, Jima said: > >> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Owen DeLong wrote: > >> > I was at Valley Fair mall the other day. Micr0$0ft is appa

RE: The Cidr Report - 4byte ASN handling

I thought AS-plain notation was the standard for 4-byte ASN's? Also to cidr report folks, in the web version, clicking on the ASN for these takes you to the page for AS3 (MIT) 46.18.104.0/21AS3.746 195.54.52.0/23 AS3.523 195.54.52.0/24 AS3.523

Re: routing issue for verizon dsl customers in western massachusetts

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Steve Bohrer wrote: > On Sep 15, 2011, at 3:39 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Brian Gold wrote: >>> >>> Over the past week, we've discovered that there is an issue with the way >>> some Verizon DSL customers are being routed in

Re: routing issue for verizon dsl customers in western massachusetts

On Sep 15, 2011, at 3:39 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Brian Gold wrote: Over the past week, we've discovered that there is an issue with the way some Verizon DSL customers are being routed in Western Massachusetts that is preventing them from reaching my e

Re: IPV6 over a PPTP Link

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:18:26PM +0200, Meftah Tayeb wrote: > great suggestion > i didn't want to use it for a high load of users, just for 2 linked routers > but anyway, i did it through a 6in4 tunnel over PPTP If that's your goal, you should just use GRE or IPIP if the IPs are static

Re: Open Letters to Sixxs

On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:01:33 +0200, Meftah Tayeb said: > Good thinking mike > i do have a VoIp carrier single homed with Cogent. > any solution? Sure. Make sure you have alternate plans for when Cogent gets into another peering tiff. Not *if*, but *when*. And you probably want to have a long, d

Re: routing issue for verizon dsl customers in western massachusetts

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:34 PM, Brian Gold wrote: > Hello all, I posted this to the tech@lopsa mailing list and was advised to > repost it here. If anyone can help, I would be very happy to avoid having to > deal with hours more of Verizon level 1 tech support. > > > > Over the past week, we've d

routing issue for verizon dsl customers in western massachusetts

Hello all, I posted this to the tech@lopsa mailing list and was advised to repost it here. If anyone can help, I would be very happy to avoid having to deal with hours more of Verizon level 1 tech support. Over the past week, we've discovered that there is an issue with the way some Verizon DSL

Re: IPV6 over a PPTP Link

__ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version de la base des signatures de virus 6465 (20110915) __ Le message a été vérifié par ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version de la base des signatu

Re: IPV6 over a PPTP Link

t; Hello, >> can i ofer ipv6 addresses through a PPTP connection using cisco ? >> if yes, how please ? >> Thank you >> Meftah Tayeb >> IT Consulting >> http://www.tmvoip.com/ >> phone: +21321656139 >> Mobile: +213660

Re: ouch..

> Once upon a time, Jima said: >> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Owen DeLong wrote: >> > I was at Valley Fair mall the other day. Micr0$0ft is apparently >> building >> > a >> > new store directly across from the Apple store there. >> >> It's funny; they did the exact same thing at Mall of America maybe a

Re: ouch..

Original Message - > From: "Jason Leschnik" > If this is really from Cisco, it must put a smile on the face of > Juniper to know their competitor of 10x the revenue is watching their > moves so closely... Typically in the Mac vs. PC adds you see the non > established player (apple) makin

Re: ouch..

Once upon a time, Jima said: > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Owen DeLong wrote: > > I was at Valley Fair mall the other day. Micr0$0ft is apparently building > > a > > new store directly across from the Apple store there. > > It's funny; they did the exact same thing at Mall of America maybe a year > ago

Re: IPV6 over a PPTP Link

hone: +21321656139 Mobile: +213660347746 __ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version de la base des signatures de virus 6465 (20110915) __ Le message a été vérifié par ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32

Re: IPV6 over a PPTP Link

Consulting > http://www.tmvoip.com/ > phone: +21321656139 > Mobile: +213660347746 > > > __ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version de la base > des signatures de virus 6465 (20110915) __ > > Le message a été vérifié par ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com >

IPV6 over a PPTP Link

es de virus 6465 (20110915) __ Le message a été vérifié par ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com

Re: vyatta for bgp

Thanks for the tip, first time I hear this podcast. On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Jason Leschnik wrote: > Ray > > Download the Podcast "The Packet Pushers - Show 31" they talk a little > about this topic... If nothing else it's a great listen > > Cheers! > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:05 PM, R

Re: Open Letters to Sixxs

> I concur in all respects with your assessment of SIXXS. Being a > volunteer does not give you carte-blanche to act like the rear end of a > horse. Actually it does, it's theirs to do as they wish. Anyone else is free to make what they may consider to be a better service. > I don't care if your

Re: Open Letters to Sixxs

On 9/15/2011 10:02 AM, Meftah Tayeb wrote: > Hello People > > i have one question: > > why SIXXS is very strict like that ? > I concur in all respects with your assessment of SIXXS. Being a volunteer does not give you carte-blanche to act like the rear end of a horse. I don't care if your servic

Re: Open Letters to Sixxs

IPE - http://www.ipng.nl/ __ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version de la base des signatures de virus 6465 (20110915) __ Le message a été vérifié par ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antivirus

Re: Open Letters to Sixxs

hat is behind HE and peers that is not reachable from cogent the better, as it puts more pressure on them to start behaving themselves and peering properly like everyone else. - Mike __ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version de la base des signatures de virus 646

Re: Open Letters to Sixxs

On 15 September 2011 15:12, Meftah Tayeb wrote: > ok, that's a positive answer. > but let me ask you a question: > do HE.NET peer with cogent? level3? 4 189 ms 134 ms99 ms 10gigabitethernet7-4.core1.nyc4.he.net [2001:470:0:3e::1] 5 131 ms 152 ms 111 ms 2001:470:0:202::2 6

Re: Open Letters to Sixxs

1321 NG Almere __ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version de la base des signatures de virus 6465 (20110915) __ Le message a été vérifié par ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __ Information provenant d'ESET NOD32 Antiviru

Open Letters to Sixxs

'ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version de la base des signatures de virus 6465 (20110915) __ Le message a été vérifié par ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com

Re: vyatta for bgp

Ray Download the Podcast "The Packet Pushers - Show 31" they talk a little about this topic... If nothing else it's a great listen Cheers! On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Ray Soucy wrote: > Is Vyatta really not suited for the task? > > I keep checking up on it and holding off looking into it

Re: vyatta for bgp

Hi, As usual this end-up in what people prefer. Vyatta is as good as the hardware it runs on, the backend they use and the people configuring/maintaining it. The nature of ASIC make it more reliable than a multi-purpose device (aka server) running an OS written for it.

Re: ouch..

On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Owen DeLong wrote: > On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:51 AM, Jason Leschnik wrote: >> If this is really from Cisco, it must put a smile on the face of >> Juniper to know their competitor of 10x the revenue is watching their >> moves so closely... Typically in the Mac vs. PC adds you see

Re: vyatta for bgp

Is Vyatta really not suited for the task? I keep checking up on it and holding off looking into it as they don't support multicast yet. Modern commodity sever hardware these days often out-powers big iron enough to make up for not using ASICs, though, at least on the lower end of the spectrum. D

Re: ouch..

On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:51 AM, Jason Leschnik wrote: >>> >> Juniper: Who needs to waste time with pathetic marketing videos when you're >> gear just works. >> > > If this is really from Cisco, it must put a smile on the face of > Juniper to know their competitor of 10x the revenue is watching t

Re: ouch..

On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Jason Leschnik wrote: If this is really from Cisco, it must put a smile on the face of Juniper to know their competitor of 10x the revenue is watching their moves so closely... Typically in the Mac vs. PC adds you see the non established player (apple) making pokes at the

Re: ouch..

>> > Juniper: Who needs to waste time with pathetic marketing videos when you're > gear just works. > If this is really from Cisco, it must put a smile on the face of Juniper to know their competitor of 10x the revenue is watching their moves so closely... Typically in the Mac vs. PC adds you see

Re: ouch..

That will either be because you exceeded your port count or the RTSP ALG is broken. -- Leigh Porter On 15 Sep 2011, at 07:48, "valdis.kletni...@vt.edu" wrote: > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 06:36:42 -, Leigh Porter said: >> I'm looking forward to the awful experience of NAT444 promoting IPv6. >