Going back to the initial security problem identified by Williams, I also
experienced something today. I guess he is right about that. I am behind a
proxy and I just disabled the proxy for Secure Web which means HTTPS.
Now guess what I was still able to access facebook while I was not able to
Abha passed away 10 years ago today.
Time flies.
Lynda wrote:
Dennis was one of the good ones. A kind and generous person, who changed
all our worlds.
Indeed.
I consider the KR C book as the pinnacle of how a book like that should
be written. Every page, every sentence contains a multitude of
information and there is no redundancy.
The C
At 09:13 19/10/2011 -0400, samuel.cunning...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
We are considering using Prolexic to 'defend' our Internet-facing network
from DDOS attacks. Anyone have any known issues or word of warnings
before we proceed?
Things to check:
- DDOS service caps
- outage remedy credits
-
Recently I was contacted by an Internap sales person.
The third line of the email read:
As you know well, BGP makes all routing decisions simply based on HOP COUNT
I blinked my eyes a couple of times.. Yes it really said hop count.
Then I replied to the guy that if he tries to sell a technical
On 10/20/2011 10:48 AM, bas wrote:
Recently I was contacted by an Internap sales person.
The third line of the email read:
As you know well, BGP makes all routing decisions simply based on HOP COUNT
I blinked my eyes a couple of times.. Yes it really said hop count.
Then I replied to the guy
Well, it didn't say router hops... They could mean AS hops I
guess. I never trust marketing garbage anyway. It makes my head
hurt.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:48 PM, bas kilo...@gmail.com wrote:
Recently I was contacted by an Internap sales person.
The third line of the email read:
As you
Looking at the link referenced below, the route optimization method mentioned
appears to be very similar to the old Routescience or Sockeye BGP optimization
products.
-Original Message-
From: Jay Nakamura [mailto:zeusda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 1:54 PM
To: bas
Cc:
On Oct 20, 2011, at 4:48 PM, bas wrote:
Recently I was contacted by an Internap sales person.
The third line of the email read:
As you know well, BGP makes all routing decisions simply based on HOP COUNT
I blinked my eyes a couple of times.. Yes it really said hop count.
Then I replied
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Jay Nakamura zeusda...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, it didn't say router hops... They could mean AS hops I
guess.
Well actually the url I included earlier contains an explanation
Understanding the “Hop”
Data transmitted across a network passes through numerous
/lurk
Awww C'mon. It is the same old, same old.
Q: What is the difference between a Sales Engineer,
and an Engineer ?
A: The Engineer *knows* when he is lying.
:-D
same as it ever was same as it ever was...same as it .. ever...
was.. - Talking Heads
lurk
On 10/20/2011 04:59 PM,
On 10/20/11 5:11 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Oct 20, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Holmes,David A wrote:
Looking at the link referenced below, the route optimization method mentioned
appears to be very similar to the old Routescience or Sockeye BGP optimization
products.
That might have something
That might have something to do with the fact InterNAP bought both of
them (and the third company in that space).
I believe RouteScience was acquired by Avaya in 2004. Did Internap acquire the
IP after the fact?
- Darrell
On 10/20/2011 4:03 PM, Ryan Rawdon wrote:
You should expectour prefix.1 to respond to ping and such, but not 2our
prefix.0 as that is only capable of representing a subnet and not a network interface of any
kind, or any machine, at all
Honestly, though. Can you blame them in this case? Given
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011 19:39:51 CDT, Jack Bates said:
On 10/20/2011 4:03 PM, Ryan Rawdon wrote:
You should expectour prefix.1 to respond to ping and such, but not 2our
prefix.0 as that is only capable of representing a subnet and not a network
interface of any kind, or any machine, at all
On 10/20/2011 8:08 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Yes, it's possibly foolish to allocate x.y.z.0 or .255. But saying
that that x.y.z.0 is *not* *capable* of representing an interface is
demonstrating a dangerous lack of knowledge. There's several totally
legal .0 and .255 addresses in each
On 10/20/11 5:22 PM, manny mherna...@comcast.net wrote:
On 10/20/11 5:11 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Oct 20, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Holmes,David A wrote:
Looking at the link referenced below, the route optimization method
mentioned appears to be very similar to the old Routescience or
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:48:34PM +0200, bas wrote:
Recently I was contacted by an Internap sales person.
The third line of the email read:
As you know well, BGP makes all routing decisions simply based on HOP COUNT
I blinked my eyes a couple of times.. Yes it really said hop count.
Then
18 matches
Mail list logo
