Re: subnet prefix length > 64 breaks IPv6?

2011-12-26 Thread Glen Kent
Sven, > also various bgp implementations will send the autoconfigure crap ip as the > next-hop instead of the session ip, resulting in all kinds of crap in your > route table (if not fixed with nasty hacks on your end ;) which doesn't > exactly make it easy to figure out which one belongs to which

Re: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?

2011-12-26 Thread Seth Mos
Op 26 dec 2011, om 20:46 heeft Steven Bellovin het volgende geschreven: > Not quite what you're asking for, but I was very pleasantly surprised to see > that some (at least) Brother printers support IPv6. Progress... Indeed, my Mac has no issues printing or scanning to my MFC-9465DCN I purchase

Re: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?

2011-12-26 Thread Steven Bellovin
On Dec 26, 2011, at 1:23 46PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote: > On 12/26/11 12:56 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: >> On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:32:46 EST, Ray Soucy said: >>> 2011/12/26 Masataka Ohta: And, if RA is obsoleted, which is a point of discussion, there is no reason to keep so bloated N

Re: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?

2011-12-26 Thread Mark Radabaugh
On 12/26/11 12:56 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:32:46 EST, Ray Soucy said: 2011/12/26 Masataka Ohta: And, if RA is obsoleted, which is a point of discussion, there is no reason to keep so bloated ND only for address resolution. By who? Sources please. A few people

Re: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?

2011-12-26 Thread Valdis . Kletnieks
On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 12:32:46 EST, Ray Soucy said: > 2011/12/26 Masataka Ohta : > > And, if RA is obsoleted, which is a point of discussion, there > > is no reason to keep so bloated ND only for address resolution. > By who? Sources please. > A few people on NANOG complaining about RA is pretty fa

Re: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?

2011-12-26 Thread Ray Soucy
2011/12/26 Masataka Ohta : > And, if RA is obsoleted, which is a point of discussion, there > is no reason to keep so bloated ND only for address resolution. By who? Sources please. A few people on NANOG complaining about RA is pretty far from deprecation of RA. -- Ray Soucy Epic Communicati

Re: IPv6 RA vs DHCPv6 - The chosen one?

2011-12-26 Thread TJ
2011/12/26 Masataka Ohta > TJ wrote: > > > I think perhaps you are confusing "what must be supported by > > implementations" (and ignoring the text describing the requirements) as > > stated in 6434, with operational usage. > > There is not much difference. > I disagree; there is a huge differe