Re: AD and enforced password policies

2012-01-04 Thread Måns Nilsson
Subject: Re: AD and enforced password policies Date: Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 02:16:38PM - Quoting Tim Franklin (t...@pelican.org): There is indeed a difference between Europe (or is it only .SE?) and USA here; no bank in Sweden lets you login without at least a client certificate and

Re: AD and enforced password policies

2012-01-04 Thread Måns Nilsson
Subject: Re: AD and enforced password policies Date: Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 10:58:35PM -0600 Quoting Jimmy Hess (mysi...@gmail.com): Manual forced immediate password expiration should be in the security admin's toolbox as a possible response to observation of questionable or potentially

incoming smtp from v6 addresses

2012-01-04 Thread Randy Bush
for incoming mail that is *accepted*, i.e. not stuff like 2012-01-04 00:37:28 REJECT because 118.39.80.118 listed in rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org 2012-01-04 00:37:28 H=(nexo.es) [118.39.80.118] F=ped...@nexo.es rejected RCPT owner-radius...@ops.ietf.org: blocked because 118.39.80.118 is in

Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses

2012-01-04 Thread Phil Regnauld
Randy Bush (randy) writes: 7.8% is over ipv6 transport but only 2% of outgoing deliveries are over ipv6. what do other folk see? What's your primary configuration ? Hub, end user system ? Care to share the methodology ? I can run some stats, but want to be sure

Re: subnet prefix length 64 breaks IPv6?

2012-01-04 Thread Joel jaeggli
On 12/28/11 07:30 , Ryan Malayter wrote: Except nowhere in there is the prefix length for the test indicated, and the exact halving of forwarding rate for IPv6 leads one to believe that there are two TCAM lookups for IPv6 (hence 64-bit prefix lookups) versus one for IPv4. A cam (assuming

Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses

2012-01-04 Thread Randy Bush
7.8% is over ipv6 transport but only 2% of outgoing deliveries are over ipv6. What's your primary configuration ? Hub, end user system ? the main smtp receiver and sender for maybe 100 users and a few dozen mailing list of small to lower middle class size. Care to share the methodology ? I

Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses

2012-01-04 Thread Sebastian Spies
Am 04.01.2012 11:10, schrieb Randy Bush: for incoming mail that is *accepted*, i.e. not stuff like 2012-01-04 00:37:28 REJECT because 118.39.80.118 listed in rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org 2012-01-04 00:37:28 H=(nexo.es) [118.39.80.118] F=ped...@nexo.es rejected RCPT

anycast load balancing issue

2012-01-04 Thread Måns Nilsson
Hi, I'm in the process of deploying an anycast DNS service internally. We're on a pretty provider-like network, where we run MPLS to provide several network overlays for different services. iBGP is used to distribute routing information, and ISIS is used as IGP. In one of the VRFen we would like

Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses

2012-01-04 Thread Jared Mauch
On Jan 4, 2012, at 5:26 AM, Randy Bush wrote: 7.8% is over ipv6 transport but only 2% of outgoing deliveries are over ipv6. What's your primary configuration ? Hub, end user system ? the main smtp receiver and sender for maybe 100 users and a few dozen mailing list of small to lower

Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses

2012-01-04 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: zgrep '=.*\[:' /var/spool/exim/log/main* | wc zgrep '=' /var/spool/exim/log/main* | wc frodo:/home/suresh# zgrep '=.*\[:' /var/log/exim4/mainlog* | wc 16673 385620 7023087 frodo:/home/suresh# zgrep '='

Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses

2012-01-04 Thread Phil Regnauld
Received # grep 'amavis' mail.log | grep Passed | wc -l 1411 (1189 if only counting CLEAN, post amavisd) #grep 'amavis' mail.log | grep Passed | grep IPv6 | grep -v '::1' | wc -l 255 (253 if only counting CLEAN - so less spam in IPv6 :) Sent # grep 'postfix/smtp' mail.log |

Re: anycast load balancing issue

2012-01-04 Thread Måns Nilsson
Subject: anycast load balancing issue Date: Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:02:55PM +0100 Quoting Måns Nilsson (mansa...@besserwisser.org): Trouble is, we find that (untweaked) cost and metric are such that all nodes are equal. s/all nodes/all nodes in my pathetically small test case/ Was no issue.

Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses

2012-01-04 Thread Leo Bicknell
In a message written on Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:18:11AM -0500, Jared Mauch wrote: Similar footprint, and I have something like the following on puck: puck:~$ grep IPv6: /var/log/maillog | grep stat=Sent | wc -l 9043 puck:~$ grep stat=Sent /var/log/maillog | wc -l 110343 I have a mail

Re: anycast load balancing issue

2012-01-04 Thread Cameron Byrne
On Jan 4, 2012 4:52 AM, Måns Nilsson mansa...@besserwisser.org wrote: Subject: anycast load balancing issue Date: Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 01:02:55PM +0100 Quoting Måns Nilsson (mansa...@besserwisser.org): Trouble is, we find that (untweaked) cost and metric are such that all nodes are equal.

Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses

2012-01-04 Thread Simon Perreault
Randy Bush wrote, on 01/04/2012 05:10 AM: 7.8% is over ipv6 transport but only 2% of outgoing deliveries are over ipv6. A consequence of whitelisting? Simon -- DTN made easy, lean, and smart -- http://postellation.viagenie.ca NAT64/DNS64 open-source-- http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca

Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses

2012-01-04 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 1/4/2012 5:10 AM, Randy Bush wrote: for incoming mail that is *accepted*, i.e. not stuff like 2012-01-04 00:37:28 REJECT because 118.39.80.118 listed in rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org 2012-01-04 00:37:28 H=(nexo.es) [118.39.80.118] F=ped...@nexo.es rejected RCPT

Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses

2012-01-04 Thread Dave Israel
On 1/4/2012 10:46 AM, Mike Tancsa wrote: I suspect the higher inbound values might be due to tech mailling lists which tend to come from IPv6 enabled hosts ? Yeah, all of my (non-internal) ipv6 mail is from such mailing lists. -Dave

Re: Does anybody out there use Authentication Header (AH)?

2012-01-04 Thread Jack Kohn
Tom, It seems NIST recommends ESP over AH. You can look at the following 2 emails from Manav and Sriram on the IPsecME WG: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/current/msg07403.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipsec/current/msg07407.html Jack On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:57 AM, TR

Trouble accessing www.nanog.org

2012-01-04 Thread Ronald Bonica
Is anyone else having trouble accessing www.nanog.org. I can ping the site but don't get any response from HTTP requests. -- Ron Bonica vcard: www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf

Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org

2012-01-04 Thread Andrew D Kirch
works for me

Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org

2012-01-04 Thread Sean Harlow
I was seeing the same problem, but it seems to be working now. On Jan 4, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Andrew D Kirch wrote: works for me

Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org

2012-01-04 Thread Betty Burke be...@nanog.org
Works for me as well : I will check to see if there was some interruption in service and report as warranted. Betty On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Andrew D Kirch trel...@trelane.net wrote: works for me -- Betty Burke NewNOG/NANOG Executive Director Office (810) 214-1218 Direct (510)

Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org

2012-01-04 Thread Wessels, Duane
The brief problem in accessing www.nanog.org was due to numerous parallel downloads of a large video file by a single source IP address. We have no reason to believe it was malicious in intent, but the offender has been blocked anyway. Anyone from AS37986 around? Duane W.

Re: subnet prefix length 64 breaks IPv6?

2012-01-04 Thread Alexandru Petrescu
Le 03/01/2012 23:36, Owen DeLong a écrit : On Dec 24, 2011, at 6:48 AM, Glen Kent wrote: SLAAC only works with /64 - yes - but only if it runs on Ethernet-like Interface ID's of 64bit length (RFC2464). Ok, the last 64 bits of the 128 bit address identifies an Interface ID which is uniquely

2012-Big-Data-Big-Traffic

2012-01-04 Thread Henry Linneweh
New issues for massive data movement http://www.infineta.com/sites/default/files/pdf/IRG-2012-Big-Data-Big-Traffic-and-the-WAN.pdf Henry

IPv6 resolvers

2012-01-04 Thread Seth Mos
Hi Nanog, Owen, I was wondering if many people are seeing horrendous latency on the free Hurricane Electric resolvers? Both accessing the v4 or v6 resolvers have horrendous latency. This could well be coupled to their free nature and popularity. So far when contacting Hurricane Electric they

RE: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org

2012-01-04 Thread George, Wes
From: Wessels, Duane [mailto:dwess...@verisign.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:41 PM Subject: Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org The brief problem in accessing www.nanog.org was due to numerous parallel downloads of a large video file by a single source IP address. We have no

Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org

2012-01-04 Thread bmanning
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:10:13PM -0500, George, Wes wrote: From: Wessels, Duane [mailto:dwess...@verisign.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:41 PM Subject: Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org The brief problem in accessing www.nanog.org was due to numerous parallel

Re: IPv6 resolvers

2012-01-04 Thread Raymond Dijkxhoorn
Hi! But I was wondering if a more permanent solution for these resolvers exist. 74.82.42.42 2373 msec 2001:470:20::2 2592 msec The google DNS server I'm using is doing swimmingly so far, OpenDNS seems ok too. 2001:4860:4860::8844 16 msec [root@ipv6proxy ~]# ping 74.82.42.42 PING

Re: IPv6 resolvers

2012-01-04 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Seth Mos seth@dds.nl wrote: Hi Nanog, Owen, I was wondering if many people are seeing horrendous latency on the free Hurricane Electric resolvers? Both accessing the v4 or v6 resolvers have horrendous latency. This could well be coupled to their free

Re: IPv6 resolvers

2012-01-04 Thread Mark Kamichoff
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:00:26PM +0100, Seth Mos wrote: I was wondering if many people are seeing horrendous latency on the free Hurricane Electric resolvers? Looks fine to me: (neodymium:15:27)% dig @74.82.42.42 cnn.com. A ; DiG 9.7.3 @74.82.42.42 cnn.com. A ; (1 server found) ;; global

Re: IPv6 resolvers

2012-01-04 Thread Seth Mos
Hi, Just pointing out to other responding to this thread that I was referring to the *query* response times, I said nothing about ICMP which is perfectly fine. So please stop responding with ping response times already :-) No, pfSense does not set these per default, they are in wide use

Re: IPv6 resolvers

2012-01-04 Thread Mark Kamichoff
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:39:39PM +0100, Seth Mos wrote: And a similar mistake I see others respond too as well, this is another domain with just a IPv4 record. That was not really what I was complaining about but I was not specific enough in my email When requesting the DNS for the

Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org

2012-01-04 Thread Michael Hallgren
Le mercredi 04 janvier 2012 à 20:18 +, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com a écrit : On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 03:10:13PM -0500, George, Wes wrote: From: Wessels, Duane [mailto:dwess...@verisign.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:41 PM Subject: Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org

Re: Looking for a Tier 1 ISP Mentor for career advice.

2012-01-04 Thread Jeroen van Aart
randal k wrote: This is a huge point. We've had a LOT of trouble finding good network engineers who have all of the previously mentioned soft attributes - anything, can't setup a syslog server, doesn't understand AD much less LDAP, etc. Imagine, an employee who can help themselves 90% of the

RE: Looking for a Tier 1 ISP Mentor for career advice.

2012-01-04 Thread Nathan Eisenberg
Say a coder gets confused when /tmp fills up and being unaware of this thing called a search engine and instead will virtually cry help my puter b0rked, I stuck! and vice versa. Hah! In my experience, this phenomenon is not unique to coders, sysadmins, or any other specialization. People

RE: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org

2012-01-04 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
-Original Message- From: Michael Hallgren [mailto:m.hallg...@free.fr] Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 1:11 PM To: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com Cc: Wessels, Duane; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org Le mercredi 04 janvier 2012 à 20:18 +,

Re: IPv6 resolvers

2012-01-04 Thread Ryan Rawdon
On Jan 4, 2012, at 3:46 PM, Mark Kamichoff wrote: On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 09:39:39PM +0100, Seth Mos wrote: And a similar mistake I see others respond too as well, this is another domain with just a IPv4 record. That was not really what I was complaining about but I was not specific enough

Re: IPv6 resolvers

2012-01-04 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Ryan Rawdon r...@u13.net said: Try random string.pfsense.org (see below) to avoid caching, since the problem in question does not rely on the name existing. I am able to reproduce it roughly every 3rd random string I try, definitely not every time. I am unable to

Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses

2012-01-04 Thread James Cloos
RB == Randy Bush ra...@psg.com writes: 7.8% is over ipv6 transport but only 2% of outgoing deliveries are over ipv6. This is incoming only, mostly mailing lists (including a few *busy* ones): :; zgrep -Ec 'client=[^[]+\[[^]]+:' /var/log/mail.info* |awk -F: '{i+=$NF} END {print i}' 33966 :;

Re: IPv6 resolvers

2012-01-04 Thread Christopher Morrow
does pfsense need real dns hosting maybe? I hear: http://puck.nether.net/dns ... works. On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: registrar-servers.com.

Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org

2012-01-04 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost mksm...@adhost.com wrote: There was a single source IP with 200+ open, active http connections to a single large media file.  The single IP address was blocked.  The file itself is still available on the site. oh! so the 200 or so

Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org

2012-01-04 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
On Jan 4, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost mksm...@adhost.com wrote: There was a single source IP with 200+ open, active http connections to a single large media file. The single IP address was blocked. The file

Re: incoming smtp from v6 addresses

2012-01-04 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:26 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: hold your nose zgrep '=.*\[:' /var/spool/exim/log/main* | wc zgrep '=' /var/spool/exim/log/main* | wc and the ever failthful bc :) err... one of 4 MX's for home email... (I'll catch the others later on) v6 inbound: $ egrep

Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org

2012-01-04 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost mksm...@adhost.com wrote: Err, while we're talking about video files and nanog, why is the video content still served off (stored content I mean) nanog.org servers? Why not use one of the many video serving services? some of which are

Re: Trouble accessing www.nanog.org

2012-01-04 Thread Michael K. Smith - Adhost
going offlist Mike On Jan 4, 2012, at 7:47 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Michael K. Smith - Adhost mksm...@adhost.com wrote: Err, while we're talking about video files and nanog, why is the video content still served off (stored content I mean) nanog.org

RE: Looking for a Tier 1 ISP Mentor for career advice.

2012-01-04 Thread Robert Bonomi
Nathan Eisenberg wrote: To: Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net, NANOG list nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Looking for a Tier 1 ISP Mentor for career advice. Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 22:25:40 + Say a coder gets confused when /tmp fills up and being unaware of this thing called a search