valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
Beyond that, if there are multiple routers, having a default
router and relying
Yes yes we know, and we've understood this for a quarter century or so. My
disagreement is that even though 99.8% of machines *don't* have multiple
routers, you seem to be
Very cool, but they haven't signed *all* of them. comcast.net still
isn't signed, nor are any of the reverse zones, nor is comcastonline.com
(in Comcast's SOAs).
We'll be there very soon. Sometimes unplanned work in other areas pulls
resources temporarily, conspiring against the best plans. ;-)
On 1/11/12 9:58 AM, Masataka Ohta wrote:
A better default could be that IGP will be automatically invoked
if DHCP does not supply a default router.
That's ridiculous. You need some link state to even find a
DHCP server. So, the very idea that DHCP would tell you where
your routers are is
If there is a Roadrunner contact monitoring the list can you please
contact me off list regarding a routing issue from ns1/2.adelphia.net
Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
By Knology.
Should I be scared?
My experiences with Knology have been fairly thin, but uniformly negative,
for at least the last 5 years. But I know that the plural of 'anecdote' is
not 'data'. That said, I'm accepting all
- Original Message -
From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
No one actually appears to have anything specifically bad to say about
them, so I guess that's good.
And for the record, I've been quite happy with E-Sol; as long as Knology
plays no games with the staff, I don't expect any
On 01/11/2012 04:38 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
And for the record, I've been quite happy with E-Sol; as long as Knology
plays no games with the staff, I don't expect any problems.
Cheers,
-- jra
It's extremely important you let the right people in Knology know that.
Bret
- Original Message -
From: Bret Clark bcl...@spectraaccess.com
On 01/11/2012 04:38 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
And for the record, I've been quite happy with E-Sol; as long as
Knology plays no games with the staff, I don't expect any problems.
It's extremely important you let the
In this week's CES coverage on Marketplace, venture capitalist Mark Suster
of GRP Partners opines that Google will bid on the broadcast rights to MNF
within the next 5 years.
http://www.marketplace.org/topics/tech/ces-2012/future-television-way-we-watch
Is 'The Internet' ready to deliver live
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:41:15 EST, Jay Ashworth said:
Is 'The Internet' ready to deliver live 1080p HD with very close to zero
dropouts to 25-30 million viewers for 4 hours straight every week, yet?
Depends how much compression you use. :)
pgprMJ4o8lC7c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 19:11, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:41:15 EST, Jay Ashworth said:
Is 'The Internet' ready to deliver live 1080p HD with very close to zero
dropouts to 25-30 million viewers for 4 hours straight every week, yet?
Depends how much compression
Smart tv's should help, no?
- Original Message -
From: Darius Jahandarie [mailto:djahanda...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 08:04 PM
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Monday Night Footbal -- on Google?
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 19:11, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:19:57 GMT, George Fitzpatrick said:
Smart tv's should help, no?
Only so much.
No matter what they show on CSI about enhancing video, if that stream got
compressed so the football Tim Tebow just threw is just a brown ellipse,
there;s no legitimate way to put the seams back
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:32 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 01:19:57 GMT, George Fitzpatrick said:
Smart tv's should help, no?
Only so much.
No matter what they show on CSI about enhancing video, if that stream got
compressed so the football Tim Tebow just threw is
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Philip Dorr wrote:
But the TV should only be receiving one stream at a time, unless there
is pip. Each stream would probably be around 5mbps.
If multicast is used it shouldn't take 150pbps, it should be much lower.
That could be one of the things that helps spur v6
Darius Jahandarie wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 19:11, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 17:41:15 EST, Jay Ashworth said:
Is 'The Internet' ready to deliver live 1080p HD with very close to zero
dropouts to 25-30 million viewers for 4 hours straight every week, yet?
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 21:40, Michael Painter tvhaw...@shaka.com wrote:
Not sure where/what you're talking about, but here in the U.S.A, Dish
Network and DirecTV seem to put a max of 7 MPEG 4 HD channels on a
*transponder*.
http://www.satelliteguys.us/thelist/index.php?page=sub
--Michael
- Original Message -
From: George Fitzpatrick gfitzpatr...@telx.com
Smart tv's should help, no?
Maybe, maybe not. I think not, and for the reason I just posted as a comment
on Marketplace's story:
I call it the Compatible Color problem. Due to DMCA, SOPA, and other such
corporate
- Original Message -
From: Philip Dorr tagn...@gmail.com
But the TV should only be receiving one stream at a time, unless there
is pip. Each stream would probably be around 5mbps.
I believe you're an optimist.
Weekly football is probably the second most important thing on a TV
- Original Message -
From: Michael Painter tvhaw...@shaka.com
Not sure where/what you're talking about, but here in the U.S.A, Dish
Network and DirecTV seem to put a max of 7 MPEG 4 HD
channels on a *transponder*.
http://www.satelliteguys.us/thelist/index.php?page=sub
Yup; at
Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Michael Painter tvhaw...@shaka.com
Not sure where/what you're talking about, but here in the U.S.A, Dish
Network and DirecTV seem to put a max of 7 MPEG 4 HD
channels on a *transponder*.
21 matches
Mail list logo
