I emailed about this to friends at HE yesterday. Heard they are working on
it.
I can see forwward as well as reverse paths via Europe - so very likely
they lost connectivity/BGP session with Level3 in US or something like that.
Let's see how it goes.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 9:46 AM, Derek Ivey
I'm seeing the same thing from my area (Harrisburg, PA). Strange.
*Show Level 3 (Harrisburg, PA) Traceroute to www.he.net*
1 vl-17.car1.Pittsburgh3.Level3.net (2001:1900:35::21) 208 msec 200
msec 276 msec
2 vl-4044.car1.Washington1.Level3.net (2001:1900:4:1::2B9) 48 msec
208 msec 200 msec
Hello Nanog,
Looks like Level3's only IPv6 route to HE is via London right now:
Show Level 3 (Las Vegas, NV) Traceroute to www.he.net
1 vl-5.bar1.LasVegas1.Level3.net (2001:1900:2F::1) 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
2 vl-11.bar2.LasVegas1.Level3.net (2001:1900:4:1::3C6) 0 msec 0 msec 0 msec
3 vl-4045.ca
sth...@nethelp.no writes:
>> Anyway, not the best devices for an edge router that is for sure.
>> Which is too bad... for very small DC edge applications, the J6350
>> was a pretty cool router in earlier versions of JunOS that didn't
>> decide to re-engineer your network and transit for you.
>
>
On Apr 11, 2012, at 2:14 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 02:34 PM, Seth Mos wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm getting about 40mbit through the IPv6 tunnel, so i'd say it works well,
>> although the throughput has slowly been dropping to the 30's range over the
>> last 6 months. But that's probab
On Apr 11, 2012, at 6:19 PM, William Herrin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>> This is a big problem for the two providers involved in this "spat" having
>> inconsistent IPv4/IPv6 business relationships (peering, etc).
>>
>> There are many professional service provi
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> This is a big problem for the two providers involved in this "spat" having
> inconsistent IPv4/IPv6 business relationships (peering, etc).
>
> There are many professional service providers that will happily dual-stack
> your internet port with
FWIW, when I took my JNCIE, I used all J-series running flow code (disabled)
for my study pod and never had any issues. I have 9 physical routers plus a
bunch of VRs on them. I agree there can be issues depending on what you are
trying to do, but I am not sure why this is such a big deal if this
On Apr 11, 2012, at 5:19 PM, PC wrote:
> He.net tunnels are also good to have because depending on your provider,
> there's still many with incomplete views of the ipv6 routing table and he
> might have a path. This is a more prevalent issue with ipv6 than v4 at the
> moment.
This is a big prob
He.net tunnels are also good to have because depending on your provider,
there's still many with incomplete views of the ipv6 routing table and he
might have a path. This is a more prevalent issue with ipv6 than v4 at the
moment.
On Apr 11, 2012 2:03 PM, "Anurag Bhatia" wrote:
> Hi Seth
>
>
> I
On 04/11/2012 02:34 PM, Seth Mos wrote:
>
>
> I'm getting about 40mbit through the IPv6 tunnel, so i'd say it works well,
> although the throughput has slowly been dropping to the 30's range over the
> last 6 months. But that's probably because of the latency.
>
> For something that is provided f
On 11 Apr 2012, at 18:36, "Carl Rosevear" wrote:
> Yeah, I have to apply the term "awful" and "annoying" to the packet
> mode implementation on SRX/J-series. Anyway, I spent *hours* with JTAC
> on the phone trying to get the thing to just pass packets. Best part
> was, I didn't know how to do i
Hi Seth
I just did a test from Eu based server sitting below EU based HE Tunnel
node by downloading Ubuntu release file from US based server. This does not
tells about possible high speed but surely tells what is available atleast.
Server itself is sitting on M-Online with 100Mbps pipe.
IPv4:
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> Also, does it makes sense to go for BGP Tunnel for now? I just setup IPv6
> Tunnel via Hurricane Electric. Latency seems pretty much OK ~ 10-15ms of
> overhead. Yet to test other parameters. I heard Tunnels are usually bad.
> Can someone tell
Hi,
Op 11 apr 2012, om 20:16 heeft Anurag Bhatia het volgende geschreven:
> Also, does it makes sense to go for BGP Tunnel for now? I just setup IPv6
> Tunnel via Hurricane Electric. Latency seems pretty much OK ~ 10-15ms of
> overhead. Yet to test other parameters. I heard Tunnels are usually ba
>-Original Message-
>From: Jay Hanke [mailto:jay.ha...@mankatonetworks.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 1:03 PM
>To: sth...@nethelp.no
>Cc: nanog@nanog.org
>.Subject: Re: Cheap Juniper Gear for Lab
>
>> We have 3 J2320s in the lab, all running 9.3R3.8. That's the last
>> *real* JunOS
> We have 3 J2320s in the lab, all running 9.3R3.8. That's the last
> *real* JunOS (no session/flow tracking) for these boxes.
>
+1 on that. We have a number of 2300s in our lab for the same purpose
running 8.x code.
We also use Junosphere extensively, but nothing beats real hardware.
j2300s are
Anurag,
We (Charter) are planning on starting early field trials with our business
customers with IPv6 real soon (within Q2). We have a few customers already
identified, but would you be interested in participating with us?
Jim Rampley | Principal Engineer | 314-543-2505
12405 Powerscourt D
Hurricane Electric have a presentation on testing their tunnels using
Traceroute6, Tracepath6, and mtr:
http://ipv6.he.net/presentations/trace6.pdf
iperf now supports IPv6 and works well for testing tunnels as well.
I have previously gotten good results from Hurricane Electric tunnels.
--
Da
Hello,
Does anyone here has clues on IPv6 support via Charter? We recently got BGP
up on the connection and they denied for IPv6 support for now. Support
engineer gave expected time of something like end of year which seems very
late as per our plans.
Is situation same for everyone who sits in
Hello all,
we've had an interesting day today in Paris discussing about how to prepare
the IPv6 implementation in various networks.
With a couple of vendors and software companies (Juniper, Cisco, A10
Networks, Fortinet, BreakingPoint, StoneSoft, Infoblox, PaloAlto) we
decided to make a very tech
> Anyway, not the best devices for an edge router that is for sure.
> Which is too bad... for very small DC edge applications, the J6350
> was a pretty cool router in earlier versions of JunOS that didn't
> decide to re-engineer your network and transit for you.
We have 3 J2320s in the lab, all r
Yeah, I have to apply the term "awful" and "annoying" to the packet
mode implementation on SRX/J-series. Anyway, I spent *hours* with JTAC
on the phone trying to get the thing to just pass packets. Best part
was, I didn't know how to do it and nor did they! I escalated, worked
with many engineers
In a message written on Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:31:04PM -0500, Tim Eberhard
wrote:
> While I know you are a smart engineer and obviously have been working
> with this gear for a long time you're really not adding anything or
> backing up your argument besides saying yet again the packet
> forwardi
We just released a new version of our RPKI relying party software, RIPE NCC
RPKI Validator 2.0.4:
http://www.ripe.net/lir-services/resource-management/certification/tools-and-resources
There are now more than 7,200 RPKI valid BGP route announcements entered in the
global system, so there is a so
> -Original Message-
> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2012 9:31 PM
> To: Mark Kamichoff
> Cc: jgood...@studio442.com.au; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Cheap Juniper Gear for Lab
>
> It's quite unfortunate. I'd really like for the SRX series to not be
It's been down three times today, first from 2:58 pm to 5:58 pm Central, and
then again from 7:59 pm to 9:58 pm, and then again from 10:59 pm till now.
Interesting that the up and downs have been one to two minutes before the
hour.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Aftab Siddiqui [mailto:af
* Ido Szargel
> It seems that on the last 3 hours facebook isn't available via ipv6, when
> tracing from HE I don't even get to FB network, only as far as Ashburn on
> their network,
>
> When tracing from nl-ix I get to facebook network but the trace stops
> Is anyone else having the same issue?
Yes, its down from Asian route via C&W for atleast an hour now (first
problem reported).
Regards,
Aftab A. Siddiqui
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Ido Szargel wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> It seems that on the last 3 hours facebook isn't available via ipv6, when
> tracing from HE I don't even get t
29 matches
Mail list logo
