As ISP safe harbor, etc., has been discussed here in the past, this paper from
Rutgers may be of interest to some.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2035633
There was also one in the UP of Michigan early this morning but it only
affected phone traffic.
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
> If that's the case, then it sounds like there are two cuts, one in the CA,
> one in WA.
>
> Frank
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John van O
If that's the case, then it sounds like there are two cuts, one in the CA, one
in WA.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: John van Oppen [mailto:jvanop...@spectrumnet.us]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 6:37 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: fiber cut in California?
We saw the issues on th
Yes. There was a fiber cut. Apparently a construction crew was doing some
boring and went through some cables.
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 19, 2012, at 2:58 PM, Brandon Applegate wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Greg Olson wrote:
>
>> Anyone hear of a fiber cut in California today?
>>
>
> I ha
We saw the issues on the AS209 backbone as well from our vantage point here in
Seattle but we also show a circuit we have down (that rides Qwest) between
Yakima, WA and Spokane, WA. The outage corresponds to the IP issues so I
would think that it is probably the same cut affecting both the wav
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 14:58, Brandon Applegate wrote:
> I tried calling Qwest (sorry, Centurylink) NOC/support and there was a
> preemptive recording basically saying there was a huge outage and that hold
> times may be long. I had to hang up before they came on to deal with some
> other things
Just to be clear, NYIIX is operated by Telehouse, and has nothing to
do with nyi.net.
j
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Paul WALL wrote:
> Stay away from the NYIIX. It goes down every month or two, and its
> current management is not competent. There are plenty of competitive
> options, inclu
On Apr 19, 2012, at 6:31 43PM, Douglas Otis wrote:
> On 4/18/12 8:09 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 18, 2012, at 5:55 32PM, Douglas Otis wrote:
>> > Dear Jeroen,
>> >
>> > In the work that led up to RFC3309, many of the errors found on the
>> > Internet pertained to single interface bit
On 4/18/12 8:09 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
On Apr 18, 2012, at 5:55 32PM, Douglas Otis wrote:
> Dear Jeroen,
>
> In the work that led up to RFC3309, many of the errors found on the
> Internet pertained to single interface bits, and not single data
> bits. Working at a large chip manufacturer th
On 4/19/2012 4:10 PM, vinny_abe...@dell.com wrote:
I've been informed that 165 Halsey (Equinix) may be difficult to get into due
to limited space, just an FYI...
-Vinny
Equinix is not the only space provider in that building...
http://www.165halseyst.com/home.asp
http://www.peeringdb.com
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Andrew Mulholland wrote:
at $JOB-2 we had a couple of racks in 60 Hudson St, which worked well
I just took a few racks on the 9th floor, I know there are some others
that are free.
<>
Nathan Stratton
nathan at robotics.net
http://www.robotics.net
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012, Greg Olson wrote:
Anyone hear of a fiber cut in California today?
I have a customer complaint about degraded performance to a site in China
and the path appears to exit Qwest to China Netcom in the LA area. Also
this thread on outages:
https://puck.nether.net/piperma
https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/outages/2012-April/003852.html
-Original Message-
From: Greg Olson [mailto:gol...@markettools.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:49 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: fiber cut in California?
Anyone hear of a fiber cut in California today?
Anyone hear of a fiber cut in California today?
+1 for 60 Hudson
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Mulholland [mailto:andy-na...@bash.sh]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 4:03 PM
To: Paul WALL
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Colocation in New York for a POP
at $JOB-2 we had a couple of racks in 60 Hudson St, which worked well
On Thu,
at $JOB-2 we had a couple of racks in 60 Hudson St, which worked well
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Paul WALL wrote:
> Stay away from the NYIIX. It goes down every month or two, and its
> current management is not competent. There are plenty of competitive
> options, including Equinix a
Stay away from the NYIIX. It goes down every month or two, and its
current management is not competent. There are plenty of competitive
options, including Equinix and Telx/TIE (which is free or close to
it).
Drive Slow,
Paul Wall
On 4/19/12, Abdelkader Chikh Daho wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Can
http://www.nyi.net/nyi_solutions/more/colocation
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Abdelkader Chikh Daho wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Can some one please tell us what is the best Colo in New york to set up a
> POP (one cabinet) in order to get bandwidth, peering (NIIX, etc).
>
> Best regards,
>
>
The Telehouse 25 Broadway facility (last I heard) is currently planned to be
shut down by somewhere around June 2013 if I remember correctly... so you'll
want to keep that in mind. They have plenty of other options including a new
facility and other existing ones as well as other colo providers
I've been informed that 165 Halsey (Equinix) may be difficult to get into due
to limited space, just an FYI...
-Vinny
-Original Message-
From: Marshall Eubanks [mailto:marshall.euba...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 11:15 AM
To: Abdelkader Chikh Daho
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subje
> There's new mib support in new IOS's and ASR9k stuffs but there's
> still not feature parity with IPv4. It seems the current prevailing
> winds indicate less support for SNMP and more for NETCONF. So maybe
> we should all get cozy with XML rather than OIDs...
All I've seen of Netconf so far
25 B'way is in the process of being shuttered.
- Original Message -
From: Pierce Lynch
To: Abdelkader Chikh Daho
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu Apr 19 11:22:17 2012
Subject: RE: Colocation in New York for a POP
Abdelkader,
I have had good experiences with TeleHouse America and their
Abdelkader,
I have had good experiences with TeleHouse America and their 25 Broadway
facility, with some solid peering options - although being central New York,
co-location can be a little more expensive there. As an alternative, they have
an impressive facility in Staten Island, NY which I un
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Abdelkader Chikh Daho
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Can some one please tell us what is the best Colo in New york to set up a
> POP (one cabinet) in order to get bandwidth, peering (NIIX, etc).
>
What are you trying to optimize ?
If it is cash outlay, you might want
There's new mib support in new IOS's and ASR9k stuffs but there's
still not feature parity with IPv4. It seems the current prevailing
winds indicate less support for SNMP and more for NETCONF. So maybe
we should all get cozy with XML rather than OIDs...
--chip
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 5:43 AM, C
Hi everyone,
Can some one please tell us what is the best Colo in New york to set up
a POP (one cabinet) in order to get bandwidth, peering (NIIX, etc).
Best regards,
--
Abdelkader Chikh Daho
Network Architect
iWeb Technologies
Email : achikhd...@iweb.com
Web : www.iweb.com
Tel : 514-286-4242
Hi Nick,
Taking your comment into consideration, while we don't have the support for
IPv6 on the BGP MIB, I'm afraid we'll have to monitor it "by hand".
Best regards,
Carlos.
-Mensaje original-
De: Nick Hilliard [mailto:n...@foobar.org]
Enviado el: jueves, 19 de abril de 2012 10:24
Par
> On 19/04/2012 09:58, Carlos Asensio wrote:
>> Anyone can help us on that matter?
>
> We need BGP4MIBv2. We've needed it for years.
>
> I am tired of screen-scraping terminal sessions looking for signs that ipv6
> sessions are down or broken.
+1
Sander
On 19/04/2012 09:58, Carlos Asensio wrote:
> Anyone can help us on that matter?
We need BGP4MIBv2. We've needed it for years.
I am tired of screen-scraping terminal sessions looking for signs that ipv6
sessions are down or broken.
Nick
Hi all,
We're trying to monitor our BGP IPv6 sessions on our 6500.
* It's look like Cisco MIB's doesn't support it:
o
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipv6/configuration/12-2sx/ip6-mng-apps.html#GUID-F646C4CE-BCE5-4144-A8AA-ABF743FAAD55
* Searching on Nagios' plug
30 matches
Mail list logo
