As the global RPKI data set and system load grows, we want to ensure that the
system is performing well. This is why we have added measurement functionality
to the RIPE NCC RPKI Validator toolset:
https://www.ripe.net/certification/rpki-validator-metrics
When enabled, it will gather the
Hi all,
The next UKNOF meeting will take place on Thursday 11th October 2012
in London, and the Programme Committee are seeking content from the
community for this meeting.
You may often hear it said that UKNOF's remit is distribution of
clue, so if the content of your talk fits with that ethos,
All,
The NANOG 55 Agenda has been published and is viewable at:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog55/agenda.php
Detailed abstracts will be added to the agenda over the next few days.
Please note that the hotel group rate expires on May 18th. Late registration for the meeting begins on
The emails on the Outages list reminded me to ask this question...
I've done some searching and haven't been able to find much in the last
3 years as to their reliability and suitability as an upstream provider.
For a regional ISP looking for GigE ports in the Chicago/St. Louis area,
is
In my experience Cogent is fine when used in a BGP mix. When we used
them, our service was quite reliable. Routing was funky at times, but we
never had packet loss.
--John
On 5/14/2012 3:03 PM, Jason Baugher wrote:
The emails on the Outages list reminded me to ask this question...
I've done
Jason,
I agree with John. You can't use them as your only provider, but you
wouldn't do that with *any* provider. I will add that they answer the
phone quickly, and the person who answers usually has a clue, has access
to the routers, and can be helpful. It's one of the benefits that they
really
I have very little issues with Cogent in the Chicago/Indiana/St. Louis
areas. They are peered much better than they were a few years ago.
We have 1 client at Cermack purchasing Cogent bandwidth through a third
party at well under $1 a meg.
Justin
--
Justin Wilson
Cogent is really better suited as a tertiary provider.
Not a bad option, but you don't want to lose redundancy when they get
involved in their peering dispute or de-peering du jour.
Drive Slow,
Paul Wall
On 5/14/12, Michael J McCafferty m...@m5computersecurity.com wrote:
Jason,
I agree with
I use Cogent as one of our upstreams at work, and I'll basically
reiterate what others have said -- overall, I'd have no problems
recommending them. Their routing can sometimes be a little weird
(though this is MUCH better now than it was a couple of years ago), so I
wouldn't necessarily use
I'm looking for recommended protocols to use for testing intrusion
detection and maybe also firewall logging.
Basically I need some kind of protocol that it's ok to discard traffic
for in a production network, so I can be sure that the various systems
that should be detecting it and generating
- Original Message -
From: Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com
I've done some searching and haven't been able to find much in the last
3 years as to their reliability and suitability as an upstream provider.
Really? That surprises me; people complain about Cogent on here, roughly,
Michael J McCafferty wrote:
Jason,
I agree with John. You can't use them as your only provider, but you
wouldn't do that with *any* provider. I will add that they answer the
phone quickly, and the person who answers usually has a clue, has access
to the routers, and can be helpful. It's one
On 5/14/2012 7:30 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jason Baugherja...@thebaughers.com
I've done some searching and haven't been able to find much in the last
3 years as to their reliability and suitability as an upstream provider.
Really? That surprises me; people
No way they stack up against level3 or any of the other 4 big tier 1s but if
you throw them in a blend with level3 there shouldn't be any issue and I
wouldn't pay more the .75 cents a meg for a gig
Thanks,
Ameen Pishdadi
On May 14, 2012, at 5:03 PM, Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com wrote:
I often tell folks, Cogent is the 'Heidi Fleiss' of the industry ..
pretty much everyone of the major carriers / providers deal with them..
but no one wants to admit it.
I don't think there is any carrier out there that could be considered
'Premium' in terms of quality of service (yeah
Has nothing to do with whether or not they deal with all the major carriers ,
they are a budget provider , always have , always will be. Aside from that what
matters the most is eye ball user connectivity and level3 , ATT, Verizon
significantly have more eye balls connected directly to there
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:27:57PM -0500, Jason Baugher wrote:
On 5/14/2012 7:30 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jason Baugherja...@thebaughers.com
I've done some searching and haven't been able to find much in the last
3 years as to their reliability and
17 matches
Mail list logo
