RE: Protocols for Testing Intrusion Detection?

2012-05-15 Thread Darden, Patrick S.
nmap has some modes that are useful for this: nmap -sX network#christmas treepackets are sent, nastygram, kamikaze, should light up any IPS nmap -sS network#stealth syn scan, should light up any good IPS nmap -O network #OS scan, should light up any

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread Mark Stevens
We use Cogent as one our upstreams and have had nothing but stability and excellent support over the years. But as other said, you really need multiple upstreams and cannot rely just on one whether it is Cogent or any other provider. Mark On 5/14/2012 6:03 PM, Jason Baugher wrote: The

RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread Frank Bulk
I'm surprised the IPv6 component hasn't been brought up, yet -- Cogent's IPv6 prefix coverage is smaller than most. So having even two providers is insufficient -- you really need at least three, so that if any one of the three goes down you're not IPv6-isolated. Frank -Original

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread Faisal Imtiaz
Let me say it differently. Take a look at thier AS174 peering relationship, (e.g using bgp.he.net), you can see that they (Cogent) are very well connected (directly) with all of the major networks. (this is what I meant by, they deal with all of the major carriers). Your experience with

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread Jason Baugher
I appreciate the reference to bgp.he.net, I had not used that tool before. We've worked with Sprint for years, and they have always been excellent for reliability and support. We recently picked up Level3, and so far they have been very good as well. It's a small thing, maybe, but I like that

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread Justin Krejci
+1 for cogent, problem free and good responsive support. Not sure why don't use only 1 upstream if you care about accessibility has anything to do with cogent specifically. Are peering/de-peering disputes more likely to occur than all other network/routing issues combined? its just another

BGP Clueful at Reliance Globalcom?

2012-05-15 Thread Scott Morris
Can someone from Reliance Globalcom who is clueful on their BGP operations please contact me offlist? I appreciate it! -- *Scott Morris* s...@emanon.com Knowledge is power. Power corrupts. Study hard and be Eeeevl..

RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread Drew Weaver
I'm most likely wrong, but doesn't Cogent basically just a lease dark fiber/wavelengths from Level3's for the majority of their POP connectivity? I know they have purchased some assets in the past but I'm under the impression they're highly levered to L3. Wont they eventually run into a

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread Nicolai
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:38:34PM -0500, Ameen Pishdadi wrote: No way they stack up against level3 or any of the other 4 big tier 1s but if you throw them in a blend with level3 there shouldn't be any issue and I wouldn't pay more the .75 cents a meg for a gig That's $7.50 per 1000mbps. Sign

Re: Protocols for Testing Intrusion Detection?

2012-05-15 Thread valdis . kletnieks
On Mon, 14 May 2012 16:52:36 -0700, Bill Stewart said: - Is there any application that can actually set the RFC3514 Evil Bit? Here ya go. hping3 patch. Swiss army knives always need one more blade... --- hping3-20051105/globals.h.3514 2007-04-27 16:14:42.0 -0400 +++

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread Ren Provo
Keep in mind http://bgp.he.net is not always accurate. It is a great start but even after years of pointing it out there are adjacencies missing and oddly some listed as direct where no relationship even exists. On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com wrote: I

RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread Scott Berkman
+1 here. Some would say if you are of a certain size, you almost NEED to have a Cogent connection amongst others for when they have their spats. If you are missing the history here, check out this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogent_Communications#Peering -Scott -Original

pbx recco

2012-05-15 Thread Randy Bush
have a friend who is a penguinista and wants to run a simple soft pbx. support of soft phones, 7960s, connect to a commercial sip gate, ... reccos for a packaged solution. i run a raw asterisk and would not wish it on my worst enemy. randy

Re: pbx recco

2012-05-15 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com have a friend who is a penguinista and wants to run a simple soft pbx. support of soft phones, 7960s, connect to a commercial sip gate, ... reccos for a packaged solution. i run a raw asterisk and would not wish it on my worst

Re: pbx recco

2012-05-15 Thread Cody Grosskopf
Elastix should do the trick. - Original Message - From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2012 10:15:08 AM Subject: Re: pbx recco - Original Message - From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com have a friend who is a penguinista and wants to

Re: pbx recco

2012-05-15 Thread chris
i can see the ads coming now 1 weird trick for a good phone system! rofl On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Cody Grosskopf cgrossk...@scoe.org wrote: Elastix should do the trick. - Original Message - From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org Sent: Tuesday,

Video streaming over IPv6

2012-05-15 Thread Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
Hello, Can anyone comment on the availability of IPv6 video streaming services? I'm thinking about commercial, 'cloud'-based services a la U-Stream or Make.TV. I can roll my own, and will eventually do so, but having a commercial service that I could use would make my life so much easier :-)

Re: Video streaming over IPv6

2012-05-15 Thread Jared Mauch
On May 15, 2012, at 1:55 PM, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo wrote: Hello, Can anyone comment on the availability of IPv6 video streaming services? I'm thinking about commercial, 'cloud'-based services a la U-Stream or Make.TV. I can roll my own, and will eventually do so, but having a

Earthlink/RIR1.ORG admin with a clue?

2012-05-15 Thread Chris Conn
Hello, If a Earthlink/rir1.org hosting admin would care to contact me off-list since it appears the abuse department at earthlink does not understand what hosting a phishing site means. I am being asked for logs to prove something, yet the URL I supply which clearly brings someone to a

Re: pbx recco

2012-05-15 Thread Wayne Wenthin
Randy, Greets from 105/102! Now that I've said that I have had some luck with Trixbox. His fun will be getting the Cisco phones talking sip and liking it. Wayne On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: have a friend who is a penguinista and wants to run a simple

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread Tim Vollebregt
+1 for Cogent in the mix :) People with a clue in their NOC, near zero routing issues in last 1,5 years. On May 15, 2012, at 6:36 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote: The only issue I saw with bgp.he.net is that it updates after 24hrs which makes it hard to use for any recently made changes. But for rest

Re: pbx recco

2012-05-15 Thread Jason 'XenoPhage' Frisvold
On May 15, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Randy Bush wrote: have a friend who is a penguinista and wants to run a simple soft pbx. support of soft phones, 7960s, connect to a commercial sip gate, ... reccos for a packaged solution. I'd recommend checking out SipXecs .. It's a really slick open source

Re: Video streaming over IPv6

2012-05-15 Thread Joly MacFie
On Jun 6 I'll be streaming an ISOC-HK IPv6 Day eventhttp://www.isoc.hk/2012/04/world-ipv6-launch-x-ipv6-in-action-x-ipv6worldasia-jun-6-12.htmlvia Livestream.com, as I did last year when it was a source of some ridicule/embarrassment that we only made it available in v4. Even if we had the

Re: pbx recco

2012-05-15 Thread Phil Regnauld
Wayne Wenthin (wayne.wenthin) writes: Randy, Greets from 105/102! Now that I've said that I have had some luck with Trixbox. His fun will be getting the Cisco phones talking sip and liking it. Am running Trixbox (which wraps FreePBX) for 11 users, and using 7940s. Has

Re: pbx recco

2012-05-15 Thread Roy
Trixbox is basically stagnated. The last update was in 2010 On 5/15/2012 11:29 AM, Wayne Wenthin wrote: Randy, Greets from 105/102! Now that I've said that I have had some luck with Trixbox. His fun will be getting the Cisco phones talking sip and liking it. Wayne On Tue, May 15, 2012

Re: bgp.he.net (was: Cogent for ISP bandwidth)

2012-05-15 Thread Rob Mosher
As previously mentioned, if you would like better representation in bgp.he.net, you can provide a feed to RIPE RIS or Routeviews, as this is where we get our data. If an adjacency is visible here, it is reported. We do not report false adjacencies. If you have a specific question about an

Re: pbx recco

2012-05-15 Thread Robert E. Seastrom
Randy Bush ra...@psg.com writes: have a friend who is a penguinista and wants to run a simple soft pbx. support of soft phones, 7960s, connect to a commercial sip gate, ... reccos for a packaged solution. While Asterisk's configuration files are horrible (and written by people who didn't

Re: Video streaming over IPv6

2012-05-15 Thread Mohacsi Janos
Hi, Currently the videostreaming on IPv6, might be possible with RTP, RTMP, RTSP, HTML5, etc. - not with more intelligent Adobe Flash players (player control, stream quality selection etc.). The most of tha cases is the problem lies in Adobe Flash. In one hand The flash URL parsing is broken

Re: pbx recco

2012-05-15 Thread Carlos Alcantar
+1 on pbxinaflash http://pbxinaflash.net/ Carlos Alcantar Race Communications / Race Team Member 101 Haskins Way, So. San Francisco, CA. 94080 Phone: +1 415 376 3314 / car...@race.com / http://www.race.com -Original Message- From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com Date: Tue, 15 May 2012

Re: pbx recco

2012-05-15 Thread Jared Mauch
On May 15, 2012, at 3:33 PM, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com writes: have a friend who is a penguinista and wants to run a simple soft pbx. support of soft phones, 7960s, connect to a commercial sip gate, ... reccos for a packaged solution. While Asterisk's

Re: Earthlink/RIR1.ORG admin with a clue?

2012-05-15 Thread goemon
fix your mail filters and maybe someone might be able to respond to you. - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to smtp.cidc.net.: DATA 550 5.7.1 Rejected (100.00) - Retry with Cc: ab...@b2b2c.ca for analysis 554 5.0.0 Service unavailable -Dan On Tue, 15 May 2012,

RE: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread John van Oppen
We have cogent in the mix, and I do have to say one gets what one pays for... They are a no redundancy, no extra capacity kind of shop... This often is noticeable when they have fiber cuts or equipment failures, it also results in a lot more service affecting maintenance than our other

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread A. Pishdadi
last time i checked .75 x 1000 = 750 On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Nicolai nicolai-na...@chocolatine.orgwrote: On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:38:34PM -0500, Ameen Pishdadi wrote: No way they stack up against level3 or any of the other 4 big tier 1s but if you throw them in a blend with

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread Peter Kristolaitis
You're using Verizon Math. ;) (If you don't know what this is, go Google it!) 0.75 cents is not 0.75 dollars.point 75 cents == $0.0075. $0.0075 * 1000 = $7.50 - Peter On 12-05-15 05:51 PM, A. Pishdadi wrote: last time i checked .75 x 1000 = 750 On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:58 AM,

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread A. Pishdadi
dam, i think this got more replies then the original thread in 10 minutes. lol On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:22 PM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.comwrote: From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi@nanog.org Tue May 15 16:53:50 2012 From: A. Pishdadi apishd...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 15

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread Jay Ashworth
- Original Message - From: A. Pishdadi apishd...@gmail.com On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Nicolai nicolai-na...@chocolatine.orgwrote: On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:38:34PM -0500, Ameen Pishdadi wrote: No way they stack up against level3 or any of the other 4 big tier 1s but

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread Derrick H.
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:49:34PM -0400, Jay Ashworth wrote: - Original Message - From: A. Pishdadi apishd...@gmail.com On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Nicolai nicolai-na...@chocolatine.orgwrote: On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 09:38:34PM -0500, Ameen Pishdadi wrote: No way

Re: pbx recco

2012-05-15 Thread Tom Hill
On 15/05/12 18:00, Randy Bush wrote: i run a raw asterisk and would not wish it on my worst enemy. I've been itching to try Freeswitch ever since I read this: http://www.freeswitch.org/node/117 Tom

Re: Cogent for ISP bandwidth

2012-05-15 Thread Jimmy Hess
On 5/14/12, Paul WALL pauldotw...@gmail.com wrote: Cogent is really better suited as a tertiary provider. Not a bad option, but you don't want to lose redundancy when they get involved in their peering dispute or de-peering du jour. I'll agree with that; if you have less than 3 upstreams;

Re: Protocols for Testing Intrusion Detection?

2012-05-15 Thread Steven Bellovin
On May 14, 2012, at 7:52 PM, Bill Stewart wrote: - Is there any application that can actually set the RFC3514 Evil Bit? Code was added to FreeBSD to set it (though I think the commit was later reverted); see the change logs at https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb/3514.html