Re: Vixie warns: DNS Changer ‘blackouts’ inevitable

On May 22, 2012, at 10:47 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >>> When those servers are turned off, Customer Support folks at many >>> ISPs will prolly want to take their accrued vacation. >> Amen. And there will be thousands more of them when the court order >> expires than existed when the Feds called him

Re: Vixie warns: DNS Changer ‘blackouts’ inevitable

>> When those servers are turned off, Customer Support folks at many >> ISPs will prolly want to take their accrued vacation. > Amen. And there will be thousands more of them when the court order > expires than existed when the Feds called him in. they could extend the court order, or prolong the

Re: Vixie warns: DNS Changer ‘blackouts’ inevitable

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:07:52PM -0700, Michael J Wise wrote: > > On May 22, 2012, at 9:10 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 08:52:52PM -0700, Michael J Wise wrote: > >> > >> On May 22, 2012, at 8:35 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > >> > >>> father of bind? that's

Re: Vixie warns: DNS Changer ‘blackouts’ inevitable

On May 22, 2012, at 9:10 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 08:52:52PM -0700, Michael J Wise wrote: >> >> On May 22, 2012, at 8:35 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >> >>> father of bind? that's news. >> >>

Re: Vixie warns: DNS Changer ‘blackouts’ inevitable

> As for being there and "Put The Fix In"... Makes for great PR but in > actual fact, its a bandaid that is not going to stem the tide. maybe we could wad up the sensationalist and self-aggrandizing newspaper articles and use them to plug the dike? randy

Re: Vixie warns: DNS Changer ‘blackouts’ inevitable

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 08:52:52PM -0700, Michael J Wise wrote: > > On May 22, 2012, at 8:35 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > > > father of bind? that's news. > > > > He was there, and Put The Fix In, to down the network.

RE: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

I have the "4GLTE" LG VL600 usb modem from Verizon on a consumer data-only $50/month plan and it gives my Windows 7 laptop a v6 address on both 3G and "4G" connections. I noticed it recently when I was logged into the ARIN website since their site puts a banner across the top when you're accessing

Re: Vixie warns: DNS Changer ‘blackouts’ inevitable

On May 22, 2012, at 8:35 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > father of bind? that's news. He was there, and Put The Fix In, to down the network. I gather he's the one pulling it out on the appointed day as well. > dnschanger gon

Re: Vixie warns: DNS Changer ‘blackouts’ inevitable

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 07:14:16PM -0700, Henry Linneweh wrote: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/05/17/dns_changer_blackouts/ > > -Henry Paul certainly knows how to manipulate the press. /bill

Re: Vixie warns: DNS Changer ‘blackouts’ inevitable

father of bind? that's news. dnschanger gonna be a mess? that's not news. randy

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:04 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote: > > - Original Message - >> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Randy Carpenter >> wrote: >> > I suppose they are selectively letting certain devices in some >> > areas. I get "der duh, what?" when I ask about it. >> > >> >> uhm... yo

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

- Original Message - > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Randy Carpenter > wrote: > > I suppose they are selectively letting certain devices in some > > areas. I get "der duh, what?" when I ask about it. > > > > uhm... you asked someone at their kiosks/stores about ipv?? > you are a very

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

Cameron Byrne writes: > On May 22, 2012 7:14 PM, "Wolfgang S. Rupprecht" < > wolfgang.ruppre...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> Cameron Byrne writes: >> >From what you wrote, guess is you are using a phone that does not >> >have IPv6 support (only Nexus phones have support today... Other > ph

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

On May 22, 2012 7:14 PM, "Wolfgang S. Rupprecht" < wolfgang.ruppre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Cameron Byrne writes: > >From what you wrote, guess is you are using a phone that does not > >have IPv6 support (only Nexus phones have support today... Other phones > >do not have the correct

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote: > I suppose they are selectively letting certain devices in some areas. I get > "der duh, what?" when I ask about it. > uhm... you asked someone at their kiosks/stores about ipv?? you are a very, very brave man. > It certainly does not wo

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Derek Ivey wrote: > Verizon still seems to be quiet about their IPv6 plans for their FiOS > network too :(. no they aren't, their complete lack of any noise is their plan. no plan. joy. > On 5/22/2012 10:18 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote: >> >> I suppose they are s

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

Verizon still seems to be quiet about their IPv6 plans for their FiOS network too :(. Derek On 5/22/2012 10:18 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote: I suppose they are selectively letting certain devices in some areas. I get "der duh, what?" when I ask about it. It certainly does not work on the iPad "

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

I suppose they are selectively letting certain devices in some areas. I get "der duh, what?" when I ask about it. It certainly does not work on the iPad "3" in Ohio. Not only that, but I can't even pay them to give me a stable IPv4 address, because if you get a static IP, it disables the hotspo

Vixie warns: DNS Changer ‘blackouts’ inevitable

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/05/17/dns_changer_blackouts/ -Henry

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote: > > Not only does Verizon *not* have IPv6 on their LTE network, they also do > *not* have IPv4, except for double-NATed rfc1918 crap that changes your IP > address every couple minutes. The only way to get a stable connection is to > pay

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

Not only does Verizon *not* have IPv6 on their LTE network, they also do *not* have IPv4, except for double-NATed rfc1918 crap that changes your IP address every couple minutes. The only way to get a stable connection is to pay them $500 to get a static public IP address. thanks, -Randy

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

On May 22, 2012 6:50 PM, "Wolfgang S. Rupprecht" < wolfgang.ruppre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Paul Graydon writes: > > That's interesting. I have a Galaxy Nexus on T-Mobile USA and it > > doesn't get an IPv6 address, only IPv4. Works fine with IPv6 over my > > wireless network at home. Doesn't

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

Paul Graydon writes: > That's interesting. I have a Galaxy Nexus on T-Mobile USA and it > doesn't get an IPv6 address, only IPv4. Works fine with IPv6 over my > wireless network at home. Doesn't seem to be anything obvious in the > settings to enable or disable that. Same here. IPv6 works fi

Re: Peer1/Server Beach support for BGP on dedicated servers

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:02 PM, J.J. Mc Kenna > wrote: >> http://www.voxel.net/assets/VoxCAST-Whitepaper.pdf > > that does mention bgp, but not in the context of 'make my server do > bgp with the voxel network equipment'... in the cont

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

On 05/22/2012 01:40 PM, Paul Graydon wrote: On 05/22/2012 01:21 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote: On May 22, 2012 4:00 PM, "Paul Porter" wrote: Hi NANOG, I'm looking for some information on the four largest US mobile phone carriers and the current state of their IPv6 infrastructure. Specifically, we

RE: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

iOS 5.1 includes SLAAC and DHCPv6 client. Tina > -Original Message- > From: PC [mailto:paul4...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 4:59 PM > To: Paul Graydon > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers > > IPV6 is present, to my knowledge, o

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

IPV6 is present, to my knowledge, on all devices on the Verizon IPV6 LTE network. I noticed its using it to communicate to Google for many of it's services when I ran a netstat. I believe they mandated support for it from any certified device. Unfortunately, it's still firewalled. On Tue, May

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

On 05/22/2012 01:21 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote: On May 22, 2012 4:00 PM, "Paul Porter" wrote: Hi NANOG, I'm looking for some information on the four largest US mobile phone carriers and the current state of their IPv6 infrastructure. Specifically, we are trying to figure out: 1. How much of the

Re: Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

On May 22, 2012 4:00 PM, "Paul Porter" wrote: > > Hi NANOG, > > I'm looking for some information on the four largest US mobile phone > carriers and the current state of their IPv6 infrastructure. Specifically, > we are trying to figure out: > > 1. How much of the carrier core and edge for AT&T, V

Current IPv6 state of US Mobile Phone Carriers

Hi NANOG, I'm looking for some information on the four largest US mobile phone carriers and the current state of their IPv6 infrastructure. Specifically, we are trying to figure out: 1. How much of the carrier core and edge for AT&T, Verizon. T-Mobile, and Sprint are on IPv6 now? 2. If, and how

Re: Peer1/Server Beach support for BGP on dedicated servers

On 05/19/2012 02:19 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote: Any recommendations of such? -Bill I know of a datacenter down in the Carolinas that will do such a setup for those sufficiently clued. Hit me up off list if you're interested in their details. Regards, Chris

Re: Peer1/Server Beach support for BGP on dedicated servers

On 2012-05-22 15:02, J.J. Mc Kenna wrote: http://www.voxel.net/assets/VoxCAST-Whitepaper.pdf This is not what I would call "BGP support". It's just a CDN. Thanks, Simon -Original Message- From: Simon Perreault [mailto:simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 11:22 AM

Re: Peer1/Server Beach support for BGP on dedicated servers

On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:02 PM, J.J. Mc Kenna wrote: > http://www.voxel.net/assets/VoxCAST-Whitepaper.pdf that does mention bgp, but not in the context of 'make my server do bgp with the voxel network equipment'... in the context of: "If you setup a cdn you need to speak bgp". I don't see a cli

RE: Peer1/Server Beach support for BGP on dedicated servers

http://www.voxel.net/assets/VoxCAST-Whitepaper.pdf J.J. -Original Message- From: Simon Perreault [mailto:simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca] Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 11:22 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Peer1/Server Beach support for BGP on dedicated servers On 2012-05-19 22:24,

Re: Peer1/Server Beach support for BGP on dedicated servers

On 2012-05-19 22:24, Adam Rothschild wrote: http://www.voxel.net offers web-orderable servers and VMs, with BGP support (IPv4 and IPv6) available as a paid add-on in all service locations. Is this publicly advertised or do you have to ask for it? I can't find anything about BGP on their web si

Re: IPv6 aggregation tool

Le mardi 22 mai 2012 à 14:02 -0400, Rafael Rodriguez a écrit : > :) thanks! Was wondering how to do that. $ perldoc Net::IP ;) That doc's a fine one to read also for other reasons. Cheers, mh > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 21, 2012, at 9:36, Stefan Jakob wrote: > > > Am 04.05.12 03:35,

Re: IPv6 aggregation tool

:) thanks! Was wondering how to do that. Sent from my iPhone On May 21, 2012, at 9:36, Stefan Jakob wrote: > Am 04.05.12 03:35, schrieb Rafael Rodriguez: >> Found this tool that works perfectly. >> >> http://zwitterion.org/software/aggregate-cidr-addresses/aggregate-cidr-addresses >> >> Hopin

this NANOG wiki is getting spammed

I don't think this is the official nanog wiki, but anyway probably the owners are on this mail list. Spammers is wasting everyone time by filling it with crap. http://nanog.cluepon.net/index.php/Special:RecentChanges -- -- ℱin del ℳensaje. . . . . .

Re: Spam from inteliquent.com subject "nanog"

Same. Nothing here. Maybe someone at Tiscali/Tinet where fixing their mailing with their new name and made an error. On that subject... What kind of trouble Tiscali/Tinet got into to pull an "Arthur Anderson" and change their name to "Inteliquent"? Context: "Arthur Anderso

RE: Spam from inteliquent.com subject "nanog"

Nothing here for what it's worth Paul -Original Message- From: Jay Hennigan [mailto:j...@west.net] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2012 11:01 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Spam from inteliquent.com subject "nanog" Anyone else just get this? Curious if they're scraping this list for addres