well one would think that they could at least get power redundancy right...
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Roy wrote:
> On 6/29/2012 10:38 PM, jamie rishaw wrote:
>
>> you know what's happening even more?
>>
>> ..Amazon not learning their lesson.
>>
>> they just had an outage quite similar.. t
On 6/29/2012 10:38 PM, jamie rishaw wrote:
you know what's happening even more?
..Amazon not learning their lesson.
they just had an outage quite similar.. they "performed a full audit" on
electrical systems worldwide, according to the rfo/post mortem.
looks like they need to perform a "full a
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 3:38 PM, jamie rishaw wrote:
> ...
> Down: Instagram, Pinterest, Netflix, Heroku, Woot. Pocket(Read It Later),
> and on and on. A bunch of openID sites. A bunch of DNS sites (think
> zoneedit et al). Infact, probably nearly a /12 if not more of space..
> ...
Zoneedit do
you know what's happening even more?
..Amazon not learning their lesson.
they just had an outage quite similar.. they "performed a full audit" on
electrical systems worldwide, according to the rfo/post mortem.
looks like they need to perform a "full and we mean it" audit, and like
I've been doin
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012, Mike Lyon wrote:
Whatever happened to UPSs and generators?
They can and do fail. See list archives for numerous reports and
examples :)
Generators are capable of not starting.
ATSs can get into a situation where they don't transfer loads properly, or
they can't start
On 6/29/12 8:22 PM, Joe Blanchard wrote:
> Seems that they are unreachable at the moment. Called and theres a recorded
> message stating they are aware of an issue, no details.
>
Streaming services and web; just tried my Roku and it failed to connect.
~Seth
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
> From Amazon
>
> Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (N. Virginia) (http://status.aws.amazon.com/)
> 8:21 PM PDT We are investigating connectivity issues for a number of
> instances in the US-EAST-1 Region.
> 8:31 PM PDT We are investigating elevate
8:49 PM PDT Power has been restored to the impacted Availability Zone and
we are working to bring impacted instances and volumes back online
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
> They may use it for content, but reddit.com resolves to IPs own by quest
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012
They may use it for content, but reddit.com resolves to IPs own by quest
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 6/29/12 8:47 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:
> > Whatever happened to UPSs and generators?
> >
>
> You don't need them with The Cloud!
>
> But seriously, this is something li
On 6/29/12 8:47 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:
> Whatever happened to UPSs and generators?
>
You don't need them with The Cloud!
But seriously, this is something like the third or fourth time AWS fell
over flat in recent memory.
~Seth
I was wondering the same thing! Also, Reddit appears to be really slow
right now and I keep getting "reddit is under heavy load right now,
sorry. Try again in a few minutes."
I wonder if it's related. I believe they use Amazon for some of their stuff.
Derek
On 6/29/2012 11:47 PM, Mike Lyon wr
Yes, although, when you launch an instance, you do have the option of
selecting a zone if you want. However, once the instance is started it
stays in that zone and does not switch.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Ian Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Grant Ridder
> wrote:
> >
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Grant Ridder wrote:
> I have an instance in zone C and it is up and fine, so it must be A, B, or
> D that is down.
It is my understanding that instance zones are randomized between
customers -- so your zone C may be my zone A.
Ian
--
Ian Wilson
ian.m.wil...@gma
Whatever happened to UPSs and generators?
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Jason Baugher wrote:
> Nature is such a PITA.
>
>
> On 6/29/2012 10:42 PM, James Laszko wrote:
>
>> To further expand:
>>
>> 8:21 PM PDT We are investigating connectivity issues for a number of
>> instances in the US-EAST-
Nature is such a PITA.
On 6/29/2012 10:42 PM, James Laszko wrote:
To further expand:
8:21 PM PDT We are investigating connectivity issues for a number of instances
in the US-EAST-1 Region.
8:31 PM PDT We are investigating elevated errors rates for APIs in the
US-EAST-1 (Northern Virginia)
I have an instance in zone C and it is up and fine, so it must be A, B, or
D that is down.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:42 PM, James Laszko wrote:
> To further expand:
>
> 8:21 PM PDT We are investigating connectivity issues for a number of
> instances in the US-EAST-1 Region.
>
> 8:31 PM PDT We a
To further expand:
8:21 PM PDT We are investigating connectivity issues for a number of instances
in the US-EAST-1 Region.
8:31 PM PDT We are investigating elevated errors rates for APIs in the
US-EAST-1 (Northern Virginia) region, as well as connectivity issues to
instances in a single avail
>From Amazon
Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (N. Virginia) (http://status.aws.amazon.com/)
8:21 PM PDT We are investigating connectivity issues for a number of
instances in the US-EAST-1 Region.
8:31 PM PDT We are investigating elevated errors rates for APIs in the
US-EAST-1 (Northern Virginia) regi
Seeing some reports of Pinterest and Instagram down as well. Amazon
cloud services being implicated.
On 6/29/2012 10:22 PM, Joe Blanchard wrote:
Seems that they are unreachable at the moment. Called and theres a recorded
message stating they are aware of an issue, no details.
-Joe
Seems that they are unreachable at the moment. Called and theres a recorded
message stating they are aware of an issue, no details.
-Joe
Hi,
On 06/29/2012 11:20 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
> It seems like a transport issue.
>
> Is there any tools for checking where an https connection is failing, like a
> traceroute for https?
GNU/Linux traceroute sends UDP by default. Something along the way could
be filtering UDP, so default tracerou
From other geographic locations I can connect to the dropbox service and get to
their https web page, but from my home connection I can't, unless I vpn around
the issue.
downforeveryoneorjustme says it's just me, but they're located someplace else
geographically, and I don't know if they check
This report has been generated at Fri Jun 29 21:12:59 2012 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 21-Jun-12 -to- 28-Jun-12 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS840255563 1.9% 28.1 -- CORBINA-AS OJSC "Vimpelcom"
2 - AS982941479 1.5
> Let it be known that I hate NAT with the burning passion of a million
> suns. But I'm the junior in my workplace, and this is the advice of
> the head honchos. I can easily see both sides of this. I would say
> with a few implementations, (maybe 25 or fewer) NATing isn't that
> difficult.
>
> Gr
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.ap
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> On Jun 29, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Tyler Haske wrote:
>
>> I'm sorry you don't like it, and I know IPv6 will wash all this away
>> soon enough, but where I'm working we have no plans to implement IPv6,
>> or require our vendors/partners to readdr
On Jun 29, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Tyler Haske wrote:
> I'm sorry you don't like it, and I know IPv6 will wash all this away
> soon enough, but where I'm working we have no plans to implement IPv6,
> or require our vendors/partners to readdress their networks to get a
> VPN up.
Just because there are
> RFC1918 and VPN becomes non-scalable fast when you connect to lots of
> different organizations - it doesn't take long before two
> organizations you connect to both want to use 172.16.0.x/24 or
> 10.0.0.x/24 or 192.168.0.0/24, or similar). The same logic goes for
> VPN clients - if one end is p
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 01:31:56PM -0700, Lou Katz wrote:
> 2. Is there anything useful to do with this info other than put the IP
> addresses into a firewall reject table?
Do you need to allow inbound ssh connections from the entire planet?
If not, then head over to ipdeny.com and grab the rel
Hi,
We implemented fail2ban about a year ago to cut down on incoming
spamming (down from 500k+ emails a day to 20k)
Now what can I do with the ~11,000 IP's I identify as spammer every
week :(
Reporting them to their Telco is pretty much a waste of time...
they are not about
31 matches
Mail list logo
