Yes, www.v6.facebook.com has been deprecated.
The dual-stacked www.facebook.com (via World IPv6 Launch) is the way to go,
until we run out of addresses again.
Thanks and cheers
Donn
-- Forwarded message --
> From: *Will Lawton*
> Date: Thursday, October 25, 2012
> Subject: www.ipv
www.v6.facebook.com was the official pre-www record host. I recall a
www.ipv6.facebook being added as a redirect because there seemed to be
confusion around which one it was.
Regardless, to answer the original question, yes www.v6.facebook.com has been
official deprecated for almost 2 year
On 2012-10-25 07:18, Frank Bulk wrote:
> Since Wednesday at 1:48 pm Central www.ipv6.facebook.com has not been
> loading (though it's pingable). Does anyone know if this has been
> formally
> deprecated?
As I recall, the primary IPv6-only FQDN was (and still is)
www.v6.facebook.com . I honestly
On Oct 25, 2012, at 8:50 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> www.facebook.com. 120 IN 2a03:2880:2050:1f01:face:b00c::
I found this to be rather amusing.
;>
> Note that is 2110 != 2050.
Right.
> But now indeed to the c10r one... thus there are at least a couple of
> clusters it s
On 2012-10-25 09:45, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
[..]
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> www.facebook.com. 49 IN CNAME www.c10r.facebook.com.
> www.c10r.facebook.com.39 IN
> 2a03:2880:2110:9f01:face:b00c::
Interresting, I was just now getting responses pointing www.facebo
I am not asking for sales leads...they survey does not ask for you to
identify yourself.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> That isn't a survey, it's a sales lead qualification questionnaire thinly
> disguised
> as a survey.
>
> Inappropriate to NANOG, IMHO.
>
> Owen
>
> On Oc
I will publish the results of the survey. The questions on
demographics and budget, are there to see if monitoring end user
experience effectively is only available to companies who spend a
fortune on tools.
Thanks,
Dan
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Pete Crocker wrote:
> By "research", do yo
On Oct 25, 2012, at 8:40 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
> Same from here.
dig www.facebook.com.
; <<>> DiG 9.7.3-P3 <<>> www.facebook.com.
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 41039
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 2, A
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> I am getting NXDOMAIN for www.ipv6.facebook.com thus it likely is fully
> gone now:
>
Same from here.
www.facebook.com is nicely at 2a03:2880:2050:1f01:face:b00c:: (which is
> kinda scary as typically the lowest address is a subnet anycas
On 2012-10-25 09:18, Frank Bulk wrote:
> Since Wednesday at 1:48 pm Central www.ipv6.facebook.com has not been
> loading (though it's pingable). Does anyone know if this has been formally
> deprecated?
I am getting NXDOMAIN for www.ipv6.facebook.com thus it likely is fully
gone now:
8<-
Since Wednesday at 1:48 pm Central www.ipv6.facebook.com has not been
loading (though it's pingable). Does anyone know if this has been formally
deprecated?
Frank
Hi all
I would like to ask any free program/method can test 40G
I tested it by ip erf program but it is not over 20G
Thank you
That isn't a survey, it's a sales lead qualification questionnaire thinly
disguised
as a survey.
Inappropriate to NANOG, IMHO.
Owen
On Oct 25, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Dan Snyder wrote:
> Hello All-
>
>
> I am a currently researching how network operators monitor and/or detect
> degradation of the
By "research", do you mean fill in marketing information for some vendor, or
will the results be published somewhere? That may help get a better response if
the purpose of the research is shared.
I'm curious as to the questions, such as "What are you willing to spend on
monitoring and/or detec
Hello All-
I am a currently researching how network operators monitor and/or
detect degradation of the "end user's" experience. I would really
appreciate it if everyone could take a few minutes to fill out my
survey. It's at http://questionpro.com/t/AJVauZOb2F
Thank you all again.
Dan
15 matches
Mail list logo
