Re: Cisco devices mass config

2012-11-04 Thread sharon saadon
Hi, i updated the app file name. now it's also possible to download the app :) Sharon On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 10:18 PM, sharon saadon wrote: > Hi, > A small open source app that i wrote to configure mass of devices > (tested with cisco devices) > http://sharontools.com/Products/MassConfig.php >

Sandy seen costing telco, cable hundreds of millions of dollars

2012-11-04 Thread Roy
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/01/storm-sandy-telecoms-idUSL1E8M1L9Z20121101

RE: Cisco devices mass config

2012-11-04 Thread Andrew Jones
Downloads work fine for me, looks like something's changing forward slashes to backslashes in the download URL for you... Try these links: http://sharontools.com/Products/Download/Mass%20config%20v1.8.rar http://sharontools.com/Products/Download/MassConfig%20v1.8%20-%20User%20manual.pdf -Jonesy

RE: Cisco devices mass config

2012-11-04 Thread Network IPdog
Hi Sharon! Program looks great on the webpage, but... you cannot download it or look at the pdf of the manual Not Found The requested URL /Products/Download\Mass config v1.8.rar was not found on this server. Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) PHP/5.4.0-3 mod_python/3.3.1 Python/2.5.2 mod_perl/2.0.4 Perl/v5.1

Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP

2012-11-04 Thread Karl Auer
On Sun, 2012-11-04 at 13:26 -0600, Jimmy Hess wrote: > On 11/1/12, Karl Auer wrote: > > I espouse four principles (there are others, but these are the biggies): > > Sounds like what is suggested is anti-practices, rather than > suggesting affirmative practices. I would suggest slightly different

Cisco devices mass config

2012-11-04 Thread sharon saadon
Hi, A small open source app that i wrote to configure mass of devices (tested with cisco devices) http://sharontools.com/Products/MassConfig.php Regards, Sharon

Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP

2012-11-04 Thread Jimmy Hess
On 11/1/12, Karl Auer wrote: > I espouse four principles (there are others, but these are the biggies): Sounds like what is suggested is anti-practices, rather than suggesting affirmative practices. I would suggest slightly differently. Complexity results in failure modes that are difficu

Re: mail-abuse.org down?

2012-11-04 Thread Tom Paseka
from the website: This website has been moved to http://ers.trendmicro.com. Please update your bookmarks with this URL. On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > Maps was taken over by trend micro years back, maybe they just retired the > old domain?

Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP

2012-11-04 Thread Tore Anderson
* Owen DeLong >> The difference is that only a small number of people will need to >> deal with the two stacks, in a small number of places. They way I >> envision it, the networking staff would ideally operate SIIT a >> logical function on the data centre's access routers, or their in >> thei

Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP

2012-11-04 Thread Owen DeLong
On Nov 4, 2012, at 5:15 AM, Tore Anderson wrote: > * Owen DeLong > >> On Nov 4, 2012, at 1:55 AM, Tore Anderson >> wrote: >> >>> * Owen DeLong >>> What do you get from SIIT that you don't get from dual stack in a datacenter? >>> >>> In no particular order: >>> >>> - Single stac

Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP

2012-11-04 Thread Tore Anderson
* Owen DeLong > On Nov 4, 2012, at 1:55 AM, Tore Anderson > wrote: > >> * Owen DeLong >> >>> What do you get from SIIT that you don't get from dual stack in a >>> datacenter? >> >> In no particular order: >> >> - Single stack is much simpler than dual stack. A single stack to >> configure,

Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP

2012-11-04 Thread Owen DeLong
On Nov 4, 2012, at 1:55 AM, Tore Anderson wrote: > * Owen DeLong > >> What do you get from SIIT that you don't get from dual stack in a >> datacenter? > > In no particular order: > > - Single stack is much simpler than dual stack. A single stack to > configure, a single ACL to write, a singl

Re: mail-abuse.org down?

2012-11-04 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Maps was taken over by trend micro years back, maybe they just retired the old domain? --srs (htc one x) On Nov 4, 2012 4:14 PM, "Alexander Maassen" wrote: > Looks like it's down again > > From ge0-1-v201.r2.mst1.proxility.net (77.93.64.146) icmp_seq=1 > Destination Host Unreachable > > Now

Re: mail-abuse.org down?

2012-11-04 Thread Alexander Maassen
Looks like it's down again From ge0-1-v201.r2.mst1.proxility.net (77.93.64.146) icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable Now that could be through a filter... however: --2012-11-04 11:07:25-- http://www.mail-abuse.org/ Resolving www.mail-abuse.org... 150.70.74.99 Connecting to www.mail-abuse

Re: IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP

2012-11-04 Thread Tore Anderson
* Owen DeLong > What do you get from SIIT that you don't get from dual stack in a > datacenter? In no particular order: - Single stack is much simpler than dual stack. A single stack to configure, a single ACL to write, a single service address to monitor, staff needs to know only a single proto