Hi Owen,
|ioctl(sock, SIOCGIFADDR, ifr)|
Shouldn't that do the trick? I don't know if Python can do that or not, but
if it can't, that's pretty weak.
As far as I was able to find out this only gives back the local MAC
address which is of no use here.
To be independent of external call I
~80 or so static NAT's configured, multiple versions of IOS tested.
Most of the traffic is being punted to the CPU through the NAT interfaces
causing high CPU utilization.
Increasing fast aging timers had 0 benefit, TCAM utilization is less than 5%
Does anyone have any thoughts on other
I would recommend you do this on a firewall (fwsm or something external)..
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Rodrick Brown rodrick.br...@gmail.comwrote:
~80 or so static NAT's configured, multiple versions of IOS tested.
Most of the traffic is being punted to the CPU through the NAT interfaces
Has anyone taken classes from IT U before, this seems like a good deal but I'd
like to get someone's feedback if the classes are actually decent.
- Original Message -
From: JC Dill jcdill.li...@gmail.com
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 6:19:53 AM
Subject:
On 2012.11.13 09:25:59, reza wrote:
Has anyone taken classes from IT U before, this seems like a good deal but
I'd like to get someone's feedback if the classes are actually decent.
- Original Message -
From: JC Dill jcdill.li...@gmail.com
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent:
From their description, it's an examcram, not an education. If you
already know what you're doing and just want to fill in enough detail
gaps to quickly get your cert, you'll likely get what you were looking
for.
Personally, I can't remember the last time someone brought up certs
for a network
Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
they've worked out for you.
I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
high efficiency thing where it normally stays on bypass, but
At 02:59 PM 11/13/2012, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
they've worked out for you.
I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
high
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:59:18AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
they've worked out for you.
I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also
What Supervisior do you have? If its an older SUP NAT may be done in
software, which sounds
like you are currently experiencing. Its not hard to max out a 6500 CPU.
-Mike
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Kenneth McRae
kenneth.mc...@dreamhost.comwrote:
I would recommend you do this on a
As a side note, how do you call a UPS online if it stays on bypass most
of the time, and throws out of bypass to go to battery?
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Mike A mi...@mikea.ath.cx wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:59:18AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series
From: Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:35 -0600
_
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Mike A mi...@mikea.ath.cx wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:59:18AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
they've
Hi Seth,
A previous employer we looked at a few UPS.
We used Emerson GXT2/3 3Kva UPSs and they worked a treat.
We also tried the Eaton 9130 and we never had any problems with them, but the
SNMP monitoring was only good for telling you if there was a problem, not what
the problem was. So we
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
From: Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:20:35 -0600
_
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Mike A mi...@mikea.ath.cx wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:59:18AM -0800, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Does
On 11/13/12 1:20 PM, Blake Dunlap wrote:
As a side note, how do you call a UPS online if it stays on bypass most
of the time, and throws out of bypass to go to battery?
It's a selectable feature. I was probably going to set it to true online
mode, but play with the other mode for curiosity's
On Tuesday 13 November 2012 12:59, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Does anyone use Eaton 9130 series UPS for anything? I'm curious how
they've worked out for you.
I bought a 700VA model to give it a whirl versus the traditional APC
since the Eaton is an online type with static bypass and also does some
Sorry to say, I've used them and had them eat themselves. They just
die mysteriously and let out lots of smoke when they do. When they do,
however, they leave behind a perfectly good set of batteries. I'd
recommend looking elsewhere... Does Eaton/PowerWare still make the
FerrUPS series? Those were
Adrian wrote:
We have several 5130 and 9125 models (2kVA rackmount), never given us a
problem in years of service... Well, one network management card that lost
its mind, reset the configuration and went on with life, but the UPS just
chugged along. Biggest plus has been that they don't cook
We have quite alot of Eaton UPS's in our network, all sorts of models.
There have been no problems from what I've seen, except when you add
water from a broken pipe or bad roof.
We've had the once in a blue moon management card reset as Adrian said
but it didn't interrupt our equipment.
On
Alex wrote:
We have quite alot of Eaton UPS's in our network, all sorts of models.
There have been no problems from what I've seen, except when you add
water from a broken pipe or bad roof.
We've had the once in a blue moon management card reset as Adrian said
but it didn't interrupt our
On 11/13/2012 6:42 PM, Tom Morris wrote:
Sorry to say, I've used them and had them eat themselves. They just
die mysteriously and let out lots of smoke when they do. When they do,
however, they leave behind a perfectly good set of batteries. I'd
recommend looking elsewhere... Does
Just go -48vdc.
None of these pesky UPS problems :)
Unfortunately there's a serious lack of PoE switches that are -48.
On Nov 13, 2012 8:51 PM, Jeff Kell jeff-k...@utc.edu wrote:
On 11/13/2012 6:42 PM, Tom Morris wrote:
Sorry to say, I've used them and had them eat themselves. They just
On 11/13/12 6:49 PM, Jeff Kell wrote:
On 11/13/2012 6:42 PM, Tom Morris wrote:
Sorry to say, I've used them and had them eat themselves. They just
die mysteriously and let out lots of smoke when they do. When they do,
however, they leave behind a perfectly good set of batteries. I'd
recommend
Just go -48vdc. None of these pesky UPS problems :)
Well, you still have 1/2 the UPS - the inverter section. It's not a silver
bullet.
24 matches
Mail list logo
