This is interesting news; it seems that Google's Public DNS is
performing DNSSEC validation (when the DO-bit is set):
dig +dnssec +multi www.dnssec.nl @8.8.8.8
; <<>> DiG 9.9.1-vjs163.18-P1 <<>> +dnssec +multi www.dnssec.nl @8.8.8.8
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: Q
On 1/28/2013 4:57 PM, david peahi wrote:
> and underscores the need for a national broadband buildout in the USA, funded
> and run by the Federal Government
Maybe Australia has a better track record... but over the past few
decades, the US Federal government:
(A) ...cannot do a darn thing withou
On 1/28/13 8:06 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Anybody have some happy success stories to share about service in Qwest
service area post Centurylink acquisition?
yes. switched my WA residential to comcast. *much* happier.
Thanks, that made me laugh. Myself, for residential, have long left
ATT/SBC/A
> Anybody have some happy success stories to share about service in Qwest
> service area post Centurylink acquisition?
yes. switched my WA residential to comcast. *much* happier.
randy
--- muren...@gmail.com wrote:
From: "Constantine A. Murenin"
> Here is a link to the Australian National Broadband site, describing how the
> existing telco-owned copper network will be "switched off":
> http://www.nbn.gov.au/2012/12/03/did-you-know-that-our-copper-network-is-being-switched-off/
Constantine A. Murenin wrote:
On 28 January 2013 13:57, david peahi wrote:
http://www.nbn.gov.au/2012/12/03/did-you-know-that-our-copper-network-is-being-switched-off/
Do they have any customers object?
I recall a few recent stories about Verizon having problems after
Sandy with NYC cust
On 28 January 2013 13:57, david peahi wrote:
> The above anecdote is typical in my experience with the telcos, and
> underscores the need for a national broadband buildout in the USA, funded
> and run by the Federal Government, based upon the Australian National
> Broadband Network model. The USA
My experience with one of the big 2 telcos in the USA is unbelievable even
now looking back a few months:
1. at my key network monitoring site telco Northern Telecom (before NT
changed their name to Nortel) SONET equipment circa 1995 kept failing,
taking legacy circuits down hard.
2. Escalating th
You should try paying Verizon in Advance, they sent me to collections
because I had a negative balance on my account for 3 months. Took me 6
months after closing my account to get them to correct the late payment
charges and send me a refund.
--
http://dcp.dcptech.com
> -Original Message-
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Constantine A. Murenin
wrote:
> Well, that's AT&T for you: already has the network, already has the
> price structure, already has the marketing going, already has all the
> passive and active equipment installed that's capable of vastly
> superior speeds, already
On Jan 28, 2013, at 10:03 , Joe Maimon wrote:
>
>
> Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Pavel Dimow wrote:
>
>> As being personally involved deploying IPv6 on an enterprise network,
>> here's how I did it (keeping in mind the fact that we have our own
>> ASN):
>>
>
On 28 January 2013 10:35, Warren Bailey
wrote:
> Spoken like a true ATT customer..;)
I've had an AT&T FTTU in my bedroom closet, which was an Alcatel
HONT-C (4 POTS (unused), 1 Ethernet; 155.52 Mbps upstream and 622.08
Mbps downstream; shared with at most 32 users), and AT&T California
outright r
On 1/28/2013 6:23 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
To paraphrase Guy L Steele:
If we are this far on into the "new IPv6 world" and that question is not
one which can be answered by a link on the first page of ghits for
'implementing IPv6', then the IPv6 people have blown it badly.
Can you show me the e
On 1/28/2013 7:27 AM, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
- configure IPv6 firewall rules (mostly a mirror of the IPv4 rulesets)
Hopefully that did not included filtering ICMPv6? :)
If the bells werent so bell like, it would be a lot harder to win
business from them.
A colleague of mine is fond of asserting that the peter principle
applies to corporations as a whole.
Joe
Warren Bailey wrote:
Spoken like a true ATT customer..;)
From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The
Spoken like a true ATT customer..;)
>From my Android phone on T-Mobile. The first nationwide 4G network.
Original message
From: Brent Jones
Date: 01/28/2013 10:07 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: Joe Maimon
Cc: North American Networking and Offtopic Gripes List
Subject: Re: Looking for
s/CenturyLink/ATT and I've got plenty of good stories for you.
I think the big telcos these days simply don't care, and don't understand.
They hire sales drones from Wal-Mart, and expect them to put in orders
for longhaul circuits, or metro ethernet, and what you get is samples
of perfume or pizza
Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Pavel Dimow wrote:
As being personally involved deploying IPv6 on an enterprise network,
here's how I did it (keeping in mind the fact that we have our own
ASN):
I suggest this be step 0
- get a /48 PI from the local LIR
And t
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 10:26:43 +0100, Pavel Dimow said:
> Hi,
>
> I have read many of those ipv6 documents and they are great but I
> still luck to find something like "real word" scenario.
I wish I had taken notes when we actually did this last century.
pgpeb2r7wChr6.pgp
Description: PGP signatur
Anybody have some happy success stories to share about service in Qwest
service area post Centurylink acquisition?
Unfortunately the ones I have contain more humor than success.
Story #1
Ethernet/Fiber service near Tampa ordered via partner, misordered as
MPLS, re-ordered as vpls.
Delivered
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
> I thought about running pure IPv6 inside and do 6to4, but it's too
> much of a headache,
>
Nice call (skipping 6to4)
> not to mention that not all the internal equipment
> knows about IPv6 - L2 switches, some terminal servers and so on.
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 11:26 AM, Pavel Dimow wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have read many of those ipv6 documents and they are great but I
> still luck to find something like "real word" scenario.
> What I mean is that for example I want to start implementation of ipv6
> in my enterprise according to mu kno
- Original Message -
> From: "Pavel Dimow"
> I have read many of those ipv6 documents and they are great but I
> still luck to find something like "real word" scenario.
> What I mean is that for example I want to start implementation of ipv6
> in my enterprise according to mu knowledge so
On 18/01/2013 17:48, "Joe Maimon" wrote:
>Suppose a provider fully deploys v6, they will still need CGN so long as
>they have customers who want to access the v4 internet.
Yes indeed, and the smart folks who thought (clearly didn't!) about how
the best way to manage IPV6 and IPV4 in the acces
On 17/01/2013 14:29, "Brandon Ross" wrote:
>
>AND game developers who build IPv6 functionality into their products. Do
>you hear us, PS3 and Xbox?
>
>Oscar, make sure you are telling your favorite game developers that they
>need to support IPv6 if they want to avoid the NAT mess.
Indeed, the
25 matches
Mail list logo