Another vote for Dyn, about 10% cost of UltraDNS and very similar features
and way of billing (queries per second)
Route 53 seems very popular as well.
--
Martin Hepworth, CISSP
Oxford, UK
On 14 February 2013 19:58, David Hubbard dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.comwrote:
Hi all, anyone have
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Bill Woodcock wo...@pch.net wrote:
On Feb 14, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com wrote:
Not tested under attack, but this DNS provider is worth a look since
it's the only one with both IPv6 and DNSSEC a colleague could find:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-21442348
Fast fibre: A community shows the way
COMMENTS (198)
Lancashire leads way on fast fibre connection
How fast is your home broadband? Seventy to 80 Mbps if you're one of the few
with the very fastest fibre broadband services? Perhaps 10Mbps if
Thanks for all the replies everyone (on and off list), I've got some
great leads I'm investigating now.
David
-Original Message-
From: David Hubbard
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 2:59 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Suggestions for managed DNS provider?
Hi all, anyone have
On 2013-02-14 17:32, Michael Loftis wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:58 AM, David Hubbard
dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote:
Hi all, anyone have suggestions for very stable/reliable managed DNS?
Neustar/UltraDNS is an obvious option to look at, just curious about
alternatives. Cost
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Bill Woodcock wo...@pch.net wrote:
On Feb 14, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com wrote:
Not tested under attack, but this DNS provider is worth a look since
it's the only one with both IPv6 and DNSSEC a colleague could find:
http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com
Cost effective. We use it for some level of failover and load sharing as
well.
-Raj Jalan
@rjalan2 http://twitter.com/rjalan2
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:58 PM, David Hubbard
dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote:
Hi all, anyone have suggestions for very stable/reliable
If you have a dns server already, you can get some diversity for free with:
http://puck.nether.net/dns/
of course, this week's outage not withstanding, puck has been pretty
stable for me for this...
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Raj Jalan r...@rajlog.com wrote:
http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com
+1 on Dyn
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Raj Jalan r...@rajlog.com wrote:
http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com
Cost effective. We use it for some level of failover and load sharing as
well.
-Raj Jalan
@rjalan2 http://twitter.com/rjalan2
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:58 PM, David Hubbard
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to
Call for Papers: RIPE 66
A RIPE Meeting is an open event where Internet Service Providers,
network operators and other interested parties get together. Although
the meeting is mostly technical, it is also a chance for people to
meet and network with others in their field.
RIPE 66 will take place
This report has been generated at Fri Feb 15 21:13:14 2013 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 07-Feb-13 -to- 14-Feb-13 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS9498 245687 6.8% 229.8 -- BBIL-AP BHARTI Airtel Ltd.
2 - AS24560 187479
Thanks everyone for the feedback.
Can someone give an example on how i can calculate $ value from improving a
product/service usability and servicability? I am trying to categorize what
we offer :
1) Improve customer experience
2) Reduce service deployment time
3) Improve service availability
You need to talk to your marketing/sales department and have them figure
out how many existing clients you would retain by maintaining the
current level of service, how many clients you would lose with lower
quality of service, and how many clients you would attract with better
service. From
On 14 Feb 2013, at 01:13, Masataka Ohta wrote:
Edward Dore wrote:
Sadly, despite this being challenged with both the telecoms
regulator (Ofcom) and advertising watchdog (ASA), for some
reason both seem pretty happy with the utter farce that is
advertising BT/OpenReach's VDSL based Fibre To
With BT/OpenReach's FTTC and FTTP there's no difference in terms of layer 1
unbundling - it's impossible with either as they are both shared mediums
aggregated before the exchange.
Which is a classic example of why I say the L1 provider must not be allowed to
participate in or act as a
On Feb 14, 2013 12:58 PM, Kasper Adel karim.a...@gmail.com wrote:
We are a 2nd level of escalation in a service provider,
trying to put a $ value on the support we give to
our NOC and other implementation teams,
when they email us about problems they face.
Hi Kasper,
Support is about
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
With BT/OpenReach's FTTC and FTTP there's no difference in terms of
layer 1 unbundling - it's impossible with either as they are both
shared mediums aggregated before the exchange.
Which is a classic example of why I say the
I don't know, I see FCFS as a bad constraint in a lot of situations...
Rather just see true separation between conduit and carrier and not have to
worry about it.
-Blake
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong
+1 for DME these guys are fantastic.
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Raj Jalan r...@rajlog.com wrote:
http://www.dnsmadeeasy.com
Cost effective. We use it for some level of failover and load sharing as
well.
-Raj Jalan
@rjalan2 http://twitter.com/rjalan2
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:58
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013, Eugen Leitl wrote:
After deciding that they were never likely to get a fast broadband
connection from one of the major suppliers, a group of local people
across this sparsely populated area decided that sitting around moaning
about it was not an option. Instead they began
On Feb 15, 2013, at 18:55 , Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
With BT/OpenReach's FTTC and FTTP there's no difference in terms of
layer 1 unbundling - it's impossible with either as they are both
shared mediums aggregated
23 matches
Mail list logo
