On 03/07/2013 02:47, Jensen Tyler wrote:
My Google fu is failing. Can anybody point me to a script that will
create DNS entries from router snmp info?
netdot.uoregon.edu
it's a little larger than the standard one line perl script, but it works
and I use it in anger.
Nick
I had a quick look at the data, and only 5 of the servers that I
was monitoring advertised a leap on June 30th - three in the US,
one in Argentina and one in New Zealand. If Todd or Michael want,
we can compare notes and see if they are peering with one of the
servers that I spotted.
- Forwarded message from ianG i...@iang.org -
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 13:24:54 +0300
From: ianG i...@iang.org
To: cryptogra...@randombit.net
Subject: Re: [cryptography] Google's QUIC
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0)
Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
On
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Jensen Tyler wrote:
My Google fu is failing. Can anybody point me to a script that will
create DNS entries from router snmp info?
I don't recall ever having seen anything like that as a pre-built package
or Perl module. If I understand what you're trying to do, that
FYI, source information:
http://staff.science.uva.nl/~delaat/rp/2012-2013/index.html#Presentations-rp2
Dashboard:
http://academic.slowpoke.nl/
With kind regards,
Thijs Stuurman
Hi folks,
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Thijs Stuurman wrote:
FYI, source information:
http://staff.science.uva.nl/~delaat/rp/2012-2013/index.html#Presentations-rp2
Dashboard:
http://academic.slowpoke.nl/
This is the development server. The dashboard will soon be migrated to
--- rube...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Rubens Kuhl rube...@gmail.com
Thank you for explaining this. Again, probably.
snip
Summary: there are residual risks, but the checks and balances of the
process are likely to stop bad actors, at the cost of also stopping some
good actors. Error in the side
This might sound like an easy question, but how do you verify if a Red Hat
box took a leap second?
-Grant
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:25 AM, David Malone david.mal...@nuim.ie wrote:
I had a quick look at the data, and only 5 of the servers that I
was monitoring advertised a leap on June 30th -
Would anybody out there have a 10G wave for sale on a route between 165 Halsey
in Newark and 60 Hudson in New York that crosses the Hudson River at or south
of the Holland Tunnel? Possibly in the rail tunnel between World Trade Centre
station and Exchange Place?
Off list replies are great.
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
The SE who's onsite is apparently claiming that there is no provision to
set a default gateway on the management interface.
Everyone knows that attacks against your management interface come from
devices not on your management network. By removing
On 2013-07-03 3:57 PM, Brandon Ross br...@pobox.com wrote:
Everyone knows that attacks against your management interface come from
devices not on your management network. By removing the default gateway
feature, Ciena is improving the security of your network.
It's time we created a BCOP
As far i can remember the ntp logs have that info... greap for leap pr leap
second
El jul 3, 2013 2:05 PM, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com escribió:
This might sound like an easy question, but how do you verify if a Red Hat
box took a leap second?
-Grant
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:25 AM,
Hi Grant,
My Linux boxes have usually logged a message like:
Jul 1 00:59:59 aturing kernel: [3812251.350269] Clock: inserting leap
second 23:59:60 UTC
This message is logged by the kernel, so you can see it in the
output of dmesg - otherwise check in /var/log as it should have
been
On 7/3/2013 12:57 PM, Brandon Ross wrote:
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
The SE who's onsite is apparently claiming that there is no provision
to set a default gateway on the management interface.
Everyone knows that attacks against your management interface come from
devices not
On 7/3/2013 1:00 PM, Paul Stewart wrote:
On 2013-07-03 3:57 PM, Brandon Ross br...@pobox.com wrote:
Everyone knows that attacks against your management interface come
from devices not on your management network. By removing the
default gateway feature, Ciena is improving the security of your
The ALU 7750/7450, etc. routers have a separate routing
process/configuration for their OOB mgmt and as of the last time I looked
do not support a default gateway.
Phil
On 7/2/13 7:30 PM, Jason Lixfeld ja...@lixfeld.ca wrote:
So I've got a bunch of Ciena 6200 kit in, with some of their
On 7/3/13 23:41 , Phil Bedard wrote:
The ALU 7750/7450, etc. routers have a separate routing
process/configuration for their OOB mgmt and as of the last time I looked
do not support a default gateway.
Can you still call it a routing process if it's incapable of routing?
-e
On 7/3/13 5:41 PM, Phil Bedard wrote:
The ALU 7750/7450, etc. routers have a separate routing
process/configuration for their OOB mgmt and as of the last time I looked
do not support a default gateway.
Well you can set up multiple static routes. The only route you can't set it
0/0.
This
+10
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Paul Ferguson fergdawgs...@gmail.comwrote:
Why does this discussion have to always be one or the other?
We have multiple problems here, friends.
Focus.
- ferg
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Andrew Sullivan asulli...@dyn.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul
Right that is the workaround. :)
Phil From: Bryan Fields
Sent: 7/3/2013 18:15
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Ciena 6200 clue?
On 7/3/13 5:41 PM, Phil Bedard wrote:
The ALU 7750/7450, etc. routers have a separate routing
process/configuration for their OOB mgmt and as of the last time I looked
do
Hi,
So just for completeness - the box does support a default gateway and it was
pretty simple to figure out once we were able to connect to it over the Web UI.
The professional services tech who installed this stuff basically copied data
off of a spreadsheet and didn't really have any notion
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Phil Bedard bedard.p...@gmail.com wrote:
The ALU 7750/7450, etc. routers have a separate routing
process/configuration for their OOB mgmt and as of the last time I looked
do not support a default gateway.
honestly? this sounds like typical alu :(
some of their
On Jul 3, 2013, at 5:30 PM, nanog-requ...@nanog.org wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 08:37:09 -0400 (EDT)
From: Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org
To: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Perl router snmp to DNS
Message-ID:
23 matches
Mail list logo
