To be honest, that is the problem with most smaller ISPs, their uplinks are not
all 10G... The only way to have users who reliably get high speed tests is to
make sure one does not have 1G upstream links but obviously for a smaller
provider that would not be an option.
I think this is why
X2 on Joe. ---Nick
On 7/14/13 6:52 PM, John van Oppen jvanop...@spectrumnet.us wrote:
Yep, that would be us. :) Lots of 100/100 and 1g/1g home Ethernet
connections around the Seattle area. :)
Joe was a great guy, we miss him still, one of the nicest guys I knew.
John van Oppen
Spectrum
Ruxcon 2013 Final Call For Papers
Melbourne, Australia, October 26th-27th
CQ Function Centre
http://www.ruxcon.org.au/call-for-papers/
The Ruxcon team is pleased to announce the final call for papers for Ruxcon.
This year the conference will take place over the weekend of the 26th and 27th
of
Hello NANOGers!
This message is to encourage you, as a participant of this community, to
become NANOG members and to
consider standing for a leadership position at our upcoming October
elections.
The call for Board members nominations will be from August 9 to September
20 and for committee
On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 15:45:26 -0500, Aaron Wendel said:
We (ISPs) are all compelled to provide information from time to time
under a court order. The PRISM program is voluntary.
Ask the ex-CEO of Qwest how voluntary that sort of stuff is.
pgpyp3UhrUiFO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 10:11 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 15:45:26 -0500, Aaron Wendel said:
We (ISPs) are all compelled to provide information from time to time
under a court order. The PRISM program is voluntary.
Ask the ex-CEO of Qwest how voluntary that sort
Nice to see our network talked about on here :0)
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ridder [mailto:shortdudey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2013 9:33 PM
To: Joe Hamelin
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: One of our own in the Guardian.
Someone I know in Washington state has 100/100 at
I'm happy to say we did not use federal or state money to build the fiber or
the network in Grant County. There is some of that floating around us though.
-Original Message-
From: Warren Bailey [mailto:wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 14, 2013 12:37 PM
To:
Many of the Washington state PUDs very early in the day took on the charge of
delivering broadband to places that the telco's did not see ROI for. It did
and still does make sense to deliver fiber along with power to the home but
that is the kind of long term thinking that can be costly up
I don't think the conversation is based around the method by which information
is intercepted. I hope the conversation is aligned with its reasoning for
disclosure - the American people stopping a government who is known for abusing
it's power. Obviously this does not mean physically stopping
Hi,
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to pinpoint and react to packet
loss across the internet? preferably in an automated fashion. For detection
I'm currently looking at trying smoketrace to run from inside my network, but
I'd love to be able to run traceroutes from my edge
On Jul 15, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Andy Litzinger andy.litzin...@theplatform.com
wrote:
I'd like to be able to collect enough relevant data to pinpoint the trouble
spot as much as possible so I can take it to the ISPs and request a solution.
The blackouts are so quick that it's impossible to
Personally I would never expect simple routed connectivity across the
public internet to be such a high level of reliability, without at least
diverse path tunnels running route protocols internally.
While any provider will attempt to fix peer / upstream issues as they can,
any SLA you would have
Dropping everything at once may dilute the debate as I am sure your
government and every other government that may be proved to be involved
will try to focus the discussion on small and less damaging issues until
the bigger ones are forgotten.
Reveal something, wait a few weeks/months, reveal
14 matches
Mail list logo
