So, only Cisco and Juniper are hit by this one? What about the rest?
Michael
Am 02.08.2013 21:34, schrieb John Stuppi (jstuppi):
Yes, these advisories (from both Cisco and Juniper), covering CVE-2013-0149,
are both related to the announcement yesterday (1-Aug) at BlackHat regarding
the OSPF
Hi,
As for Ericsson (Redback) products.
We found the issue quite some time ago and fixed it immediately.
Smart Edge code base (SEOS) has been fixed back to the release 6.3
SSR code base (IPOS) - not affected.
Please let me know if you have got any questions.
Regards,
Jeff
On Aug 3, 2013, at
On 8/2/13, Aled Morris al...@qix.co.uk wrote:
Cisco published an advisory on OSPF vulnerability yesterday I think. I
assume it's related.
OSPF is a dynamic routing protocol. It automatically discovers
neighbors on a multi-access segment claiming to be routers.
In what way could it possibly be
It's listed as being on a BOGON at HE, too:
http://bgp.he.net/net/66.185.0.0/20
Not sure who HE uses to make that designation.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Kenny Kant [mailto:akennyk...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 12:07 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: IP allocations /
Frank,
HE uses the extended files for these stats since the standard ones will
soon be deprecated. As Rene pointed out, the extended and standard
delegation files from ARIN do not match for this prefix. I do not know
why there is inconsistent data between the two, but this is something
that
On 04/08/2013, at 2:06 PM, Rob Mosher rmos...@he.net wrote:
Frank,
HE uses the extended files for these stats since the standard ones will soon
be deprecated. As Rene pointed out, the extended and standard delegation
files from ARIN do not match for this prefix. I do not know why
Hello everyone
I was looking at global IPv4 table and saw some strange entries from AS1.
As per ARIN whois AS1 seems to be with Level3 but I noticed few prefixes of
Brazil based ISP - Netvip
http://bgp.he.net/AS1#_prefixes
Looking at any prefix in detail, it seems like there are multiple
7 matches
Mail list logo