You are absolutely right
-Jorge
On Aug 15, 2013, at 11:55 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote:
Ok, I'll put on my flame-proof undies, have some fun
and bite at this one...
--- s...@donelan.com wrote:
From: Sean Donelan s...@donelan.com
:: It seems odd that there are
Hi,
On 14/08/13 9:00 , Sean Donelan wrote:
I should have remembered, NANOG prefers to correct things. So here are
several estimates about how much IP/Internet traffic is downloaded
in a month. Does anyone have better numbers, or better souces of
numbers that can be shared?
No source, but a
On 8/16/2013 12:46 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
On Aug 16, 2013, at 00:37 , Sean Donelan s...@donelan.com wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013, Seth Mattinen wrote:
We'll also need this data in units of number of Libraries of Congress.
The researchers at the Library of Congress are more than happy to
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:37:20AM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
Even the researchers at the Library of Congress, if you give them
enough beer and beg them enough, will eventually give you an estimate
about the Library collection size as of the end of the last year.
What so special about the
On Aug 15, 2013, at 9:18 PM, Brandon Martin lists.na...@monmotha.net wrote:
As to why people wouldn't put them behind dedicated firewalls, imagine
something like a single-server colo scenario.
I have asked about this on other lists, but I'll ask here.
Does anyone know of a small (think
Hi,
I find it odd that this is suddenly news...
There is plenty of security updates for iBMC/iDrac/etc from
IBM/HP/Dell/etc over the years.
But:
You can use ipmitool, rootkit/exploit some Linux box and upload your
own firmware in that iBMC/iDrac/etc... for example the BMC
There was an interesting paper at Usenix Security on the effects of deploying
DNSSEC; see
https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity13/measuring-practical-impact-dnssec-deployment
. The difference in geographical impact was quite striking.
--Steve Bellovin,
Don't usually poke NANOG for a second pair of eyes, but got hit with an
urgent need to get connectivity up on a small budget.
I've run into a situation where I require multiple DMVPN spokes to be
behind a single NAT IP (picture of things to come with CGN?)
The DMVPN endpoint works fine behind
Wondering if anyone else is receiving reports of email to mail.mil
addresses being delayed or refused? The mail.mil mx appear to be
selectively refusing mail.
If anyone has good (non-email) contact info for the mail.mil operators
please send it my way. Thanks.
Antonio Querubin
e-mail:
No way around this with DMVPN.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 16, 2013, at 9:05, Ray Soucy r...@maine.edu wrote:
Don't usually poke NANOG for a second pair of eyes, but got hit with an
urgent need to get connectivity up on a small budget.
I've run into a situation where I require multiple
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:37:20AM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:
Even the researchers at the Library of Congress, if you give them
enough beer and beg them enough, will eventually give you an estimate
about the Library collection size as of
Thanks for all the comments. Through the entire thread on-line and
off-line only one person contributed an estimate
Patrick Gilmore said:
All that said: My back-of-the-envelope math says the Internet is order
of 1 exabyte/day, as defined by my own rules on what counts as the
On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Sean Donelan wrote:
Thanks for all the comments. Through the entire thread on-line and off-line
only one person contributed an estimate
Patrick Gilmore said:
All that said: My back-of-the-envelope math says the Internet is order
of 1 exabyte/day, as defined by my own
Hi guys,
I have a customer who peers via eBGP with Lightpath aka Cablevision (AS
6128) and Level3 (AS 3356) and wants to do some dual-WAN router redundancy.
I have heard that carriers will sometimes agree to set up a /29 WAN subnet
for a customer and peer with (2) customer routers.
The
The gotcha with that is then you need a switch in front of the routers. I'd
just setup a carrier on each router and run ibgp between.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 16, 2013, at 3:35 PM, Adam Greene maill...@webjogger.net wrote:
Hi guys,
I have a customer who peers via eBGP with Lightpath
Time Warner installed a Juniper EX4200 as the CPE device for us, so we
connected 2 routers and had two separate BGP sessions. They have us a /29 to
accomplish it.
-Randy
On Aug 16, 2013, at 16:53, Justin Vocke justin.vo...@gmail.com wrote:
The gotcha with that is then you need a switch in
Thanks, Justin. Yes, we considered that option, too. But then if one WAN
router goes down, the customer will only have connectivity through a single
upstream provider. We'd prefer to maintain connectivity to both even if a
router fails. Switches in front of the routers is no problem.
But the switches themselves are a single point of failure, so if a
switch dies you still only have a single provider (assuming one switch
per provider). ;)
All you're doing is moving the your single point of failure from the
routers to the switches, with arguably very little increase in
Pete,
Good point, thanks. Yes, in this case, there is some cause to believe that
the switches will prove more reliable than the routers. They're older
7200VXR's and have had some lockups in the past, possibly due to PA card /
IOS incompatibilities.
But you're right, we are also considering
Hello Everyone,
We are in the market for a APC UPS, and had a few questions. We are not
that familiar with APC, and was hoping for some clarity. Our power demands
will be for a unit that will sustain 3 kW/4 kVA scalable to 8 kVA.
Input:
The first issue is that I see all the units default with
http://www.amazon.com/Conntek-Locking-Adapter-Straight-Connector/dp/B001H9TSEW
If you're not sure, then spend for an hour with a licensed electrician.
--
Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Nick Khamis sym...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
We
This report has been generated at Fri Aug 16 21:13:27 2013 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
BGP Update Report
Interval: 08-Aug-13 -to- 15-Aug-13 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS580049023 2.8% 215.0 -- DNIC-ASBLK-05800-06055 - DoD
Network Information Center
2
Hey guys,
I’m hearing reports of Google services (Search, Youtube, Mail, etc) going down
all over the place, providing extremely spotty service. Works fine for me right
now, but a lot of people seem to be having problems all over the world.
Any ideas what’s going on?
Thanks!
~ Em
I was having a hard time getting to Google Maps from my Verizon FiOS
connection and also from my Hurricane Electric IPv6 tunnel. I was able
to ping them though. Didn't try any other google services.
Derek
On Aug 16, 2013, at 7:32 PM, win...@team-metro.net
win...@team-metro.net wrote:
Hey
I've two 2 short outages to both Google Search and Google Mail/Apps over
the last 30 mins. Both cleared after a few minutes. For Search at least
it was returning a Google error page.
Comcast in the Bay Area.
Scott
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 4:29 PM, win...@team-metro.net wrote:
Hey guys,
At about 5 minutes to 4:00p PDT, downforeveryoneorjustme.com confirmed that
it's not just you! for google.com; in fact, it's still saying that, although
I can reach Google services on our network now.
I could also ping Google, but I tried to open a connection to port 80 on
google.com via
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:29:30PM +, win...@team-metro.net wrote:
I’m hearing reports of Google services (Search, Youtube, Mail, etc) going
down all over the place, providing extremely spotty service. Works fine for
me right now, but a lot of people seem to be having problems all over
On 13-08-16 05:47 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
We are in the market for a APC UPS, and had a few questions. We are not
that familiar with APC, and was hoping for some clarity. Our power demands
will be for a unit that will sustain 3 kW/4 kVA scalable to 8 kVA.
The model you're looking at looks good
On 13-08-16 10:33 PM, Michael Brown wrote:
VOLTAGE = 5 | 6 | 14 (5?120V, 6?208 or 240V, 14?120/240V combo i.e. 2
hots, neutral and ground)
That would be:
VOLTAGE = 5 | 6 | 14 (5-120V, 6-208 or 240V, 14-120/240V combo i.e. 2 hots,
neutral and ground)
The mailing list ate my Unicode arrows. Nom
31 matches
Mail list logo
