Re: Repost: links to DDoS-related press & reports.

2013-10-28 Thread bmanning
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 03:29:07PM +, Dobbins, Roland wrote: > > A couple of folks have asked me privately for links to some presos on DDoS, > BCPs, et. al., so I'm re-posting the links here, for future citation: > > DDoS & BCP presos: > > > > 2

Repost: links to DDoS-related press & reports.

2013-10-28 Thread Dobbins, Roland
A couple of folks have asked me privately for links to some presos on DDoS, BCPs, et. al., so I'm re-posting the links here, for future citation: DDoS & BCP presos: 2009 - 2011 Arbor WISRs: Current Arbo

Re: NOOP and Terremark

2013-10-28 Thread jamie rishaw
I'm sorry, I should have phrased differently. I meant: By the number of responses I've received that have been told to me "in private," or with a "this is not public info,"... While I certainly would not violate those restraints I do agree with you. jamie On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Dobb

RE: If you're on LinkedIn, and you use a smart phone...

2013-10-28 Thread Leo Vegoda
Jimmy Hess wrote: [...] > This may be easier than you think, if remote account access is allowed > only using Web-based mail, and company managed mobile devices. > Whitelist the cell carrier's mobile network, using ActiveSync. > > An IMAP connection attempt from anywhere is immediately suspec

Contact at Cogenet

2013-10-28 Thread Luca Salvatore
Hi, If there is anyone on list that can help me out with a routing issue with Cogenet could you please contact me off list? Specifically with this router - gi9-37.mag01.mad05.atlas.cogentco.com Thanks

RE: Network configuration archiving

2013-10-28 Thread Jamie Bowden
> From: Ricky Beam [mailto:jfb...@gmail.com] > On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:08:44 -0400, Michael Kehoe > wrote: > > As far as I'm aware (someone please correct me if I'm wrong), but Cisco > > is the only vendor that supports this. > > Ascend did as well. I used to backup the MAX-TNT's via snmp. Made

Re: NOOP and Terremark

2013-10-28 Thread Dobbins, Roland
On Oct 28, 2013, at 5:27 PM, jamie rishaw wrote: > It's clear that we all still consider open discussions on things like this > to be something to be kept to a small vetted community. It's not clear to me at all. Real-time discussions of specific events in order to coordinate response, sure

NOOP and Terremark

2013-10-28 Thread jamie rishaw
1) Thank you all for responses in private re my 80Gbps thread - It's clear that we all still consider open discussions on things like this to be something to be kept to a small vetted community. 2) Surprised to see no threads on Terremark's epic fail w/r/t Fed-Cloud and healthcare.gov. News artic