On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:13 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>
> I can't be the only one to have been following this 12.8TB of neat-o-ness:
>
> http://www.bricscable.com/
" 34 000 km, 2 fibre pair, 12.8 Tbit/s"
so you can get 80 waves on a single pair, 80 100g waves? that's 8tbps
where's the missing
On 3 November 2013 02:59, Bryan Socha wrote:
> I've been searching for a way to submit updates to google for
> incorrect geodatabase information on our ip address assignments.
> does anyone have a contact or know how to do this?
>
>
You might want to look at:
https://support.google.com/websearch
I've been searching for a way to submit updates to google for
incorrect geodatabase information on our ip address assignments.
does anyone have a contact or know how to do this?
Thanks,
Bryan Socha
I've never seen a byte claiming any nationality, Internet network topology is
not geopolitical (at least a vast percentage of it) and routing policy !=
politics. When now in a "cloud" world your data may get replicated anywhere,
trying to create "islands" (which btw are not immune to eavesdropp
On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:12:54PM -0400,
Jay Ashworth wrote
a message of 8 lines which said:
> The balkanizing of the Net?
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/11/01/how-anti-nsa-backlash-could-fracture-the-internet-along-national-borders/
So, to host your content in t
LOL, I was typing on an iPad and didn't notice, s/nog/big/
Thanks for the catch.
-J
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> I'm afraid I can't glark 'nog' in that sentence from context...
>
>
> Jorge Amodio wrote:
>>
>>
>> Saying that advocating for an open and global Internet
I'm afraid I can't glark 'nog' in that sentence from context...
Jorge Amodio wrote:
>
>Saying that advocating for an open and global Internet is a nog part of
>USG's cyber-espionage efforts is completely preposterous.
>
>-Jorge
>
>> On Nov 2, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>>
>> The bal
Saying that advocating for an open and global Internet is a nog part of USG's
cyber-espionage efforts is completely preposterous.
-Jorge
> On Nov 2, 2013, at 12:12 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>
> The balkanizing of the Net?
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/11/01/how-ant
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:06 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> > In article you
>> > write:
>> >>The balkanizing of the Net?
>> >>
>>
>> >> >>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worl
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:06 PM, John Levine wrote:
> > In article you
> write:
> >>The balkanizing of the Net?
> >>
> >>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/11/01/how-anti-nsa-backlash-could-fracture-the-internet-along
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 3:06 PM, John Levine wrote:
> In article you write:
>>The balkanizing of the Net?
>>
>>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/11/01/how-anti-nsa-backlash-could-fracture-the-internet-along-national-borders/
>
> I expect we'll hear lots of pontification, quiet
In article you write:
>The balkanizing of the Net?
>
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/11/01/how-anti-nsa-backlash-could-fracture-the-internet-along-national-borders/
I expect we'll hear lots of pontification, quietly fading away when
someone explains to the pontificators ju
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 10:40 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Harry Hoffman
> wrote:
> > That's with a recommendation of using RC4.
> it’s also with 1024 bit keys in the key exchange.
>
Better leverage quantum encryption tech to exchange those symmetric keys
securely; I w
The balkanizing of the Net?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2013/11/01/how-anti-nsa-backlash-could-fracture-the-internet-along-national-borders/
Cheers,
- jra
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Hi,
> Also remember that this thread is on secure rDNS by the ISP,
> which means you can't expect the ISP operate rDNS very securely
> even though the ISP operate rest of networking not very securely.
You're linking things together that are completely orthogonal...
Sander
On 11/01/2013 07:18 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:
So even if Goog or Yahoo encrypt their data between DCs, what stops
the NSA from decrypting that data? Or would it be done simply to make
their lives a bit more of a PiTA to get the data they want?
My bet is that when the said the were "partially" capa
Sander Steffann wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
>> Even if the CPE does so, which means there is no NAT, the key to
>> update rDNS must, naturally, be contained only in DHCP reply to the
>> CPE.
>
> You are misunderstanding the technology. Many cable operators offer a
> cable modem in bridged mode so that the
In message <5274def9.3040...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, Masataka Ohta writes:
> Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >> Over the cable modem?
> >
> > Yes.
>
> OK.
>
> >> The cable modem is the CPE, which accept the DHCP packet to it.
> >
> > A cable modem both accepts DHCP packets (for management of the
Hi,
Op 2 nov. 2013, om 12:16 heeft Masataka Ohta
het volgende geschreven:
> Mark Andrews wrote:
>
>> A cable modem both accepts DHCP packets (for management of the
>> modem) and passes DHCP packets through to the customer device.
>
> Even if the CPE does so, which means there is no NAT, the k
Mark Andrews wrote:
>> Over the cable modem?
>
> Yes.
OK.
>> The cable modem is the CPE, which accept the DHCP packet to it.
>
> A cable modem both accepts DHCP packets (for management of the
> modem) and passes DHCP packets through to the customer device.
Even if the CPE does so, which means
In message <5274a77a.8090...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>, Masataka Ohta writes:
> Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> >> Who can see the packets sent from the local ISP to the CPE
> >> directly connected to the ISP?
> >
> > The dhcpd traffic coming in over the cable modem and you want to
> > send secrets in
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Mike Lyon wrote:
> So even if Goog or Yahoo encrypt their data between DCs, what stops
> the NSA from decrypting that data? Or would it be done simply to make
> their lives a bit more of a PiTA to get the data they want?
>
> -Mike
>
I'm just gonna toss this URL o
Mark Andrews wrote:
>> Who can see the packets sent from the local ISP to the CPE
>> directly connected to the ISP?
>
> The dhcpd traffic coming in over the cable modem and you want to
> send secrets in the clear over a channel like this.
Over the cable modem?
The cable modem is the CPE, which
Jimmy Hess wrote:
> The trouble with end-to-end encryption as a solution;is the
> difficulty/impossibility of establishing ipsec SAs with arbitrary
> hosts on the internet; without manual pre-configuration of every pair of
> hosts.
In this case, the ISP and the CPE are physically an
24 matches
Mail list logo
