On 11/23/2013 1:22 AM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> Special thanks to Alexander from AT&T's "Tier-2" dept, though my
> suspicion is that that is not where he works, as he seems
> exceptionally clueful.
> Additional thanks to Owen DeLong who finally got me off my ass to
> actually do this, I'll see you i
On 22 November 2013 22:22, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> Status Available
> Global IPv6 Address 2602:306:cddd:::1/64
> Link-local IPv6 Address fe80::923e:abff::7e40
> Router Advertisement Prefix 2602:306:cddd:::/64
> IPV6 Delegated LAN Prefix 2602:306:cddd:::
> 260
Now if Time Warner Cable would get their act together in Ohio (looks at
them :) )
On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> Yay! Thank you very much.
>
> You should write up something to their support forums!
>
> Mehmet
>
> > On Nov 22, 2013, at 22:22, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> >
>
Yay! Thank you very much.
You should write up something to their support forums!
Mehmet
> On Nov 22, 2013, at 22:22, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
>
> Special thanks to Alexander from AT&T's "Tier-2" dept, though my suspicion is
> that that is not where he works, as he seems exceptionally clueful.
>
Special thanks to Alexander from AT&T's "Tier-2" dept, though my
suspicion is that that is not where he works, as he seems exceptionally
clueful.
Additional thanks to Owen DeLong who finally got me off my ass to
actually do this, I'll see you in the sky!
Ok, is this core routing? not really, b
Someone from Alexa really needs to answer how that list is created because
their web site discussion is way too hand-wavy, but given that neither of
those appear to be currently valid names, and 1.1.1.1 is on the list at all,
there must be some measure of cross link and redirection occurrences. For
BGP Update Report
Interval: 14-Nov-13 -to- 21-Nov-13 (7 days)
Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072
TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS
Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name
1 - AS754579543 2.7% 37.5 -- TPG-INTERNET-AP TPG Telecom
Limited
2 - AS30693 4
This report has been generated at Fri Nov 22 21:13:32 2013 AEST.
The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router
and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table.
Check http://www.cidr-report.org for a current version of this report.
Recent Table History
Date
So one has to wonder how those names made it into the top 100 list if it’s
supposed to be a top 100 web sites, since they are obviously not web sites.
(at least in the case of the two in the top 100)
Owen
On Nov 22, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Tony Hain wrote:
> The only thing it explicitly strips out a
The only thing it explicitly strips out are dotted-quads, which don't occur
until # 4255. The code makes five passes at getaddrinfo() for IPv4 before
giving up, and then it checks for a leading www and if that exists it strips
it off and does the 5 tries loop again, then later the same process for
It would be way more than 2 if it were CNAME, methinks.
Owen
On Nov 22, 2013, at 12:12 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 11/22/13, 12:01 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:18:27 -0800, "Tony Hain" said:
>>
>>> The top 100 websites: records and IPv6 connectivity
>>>
On 11/22/13, 12:01 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:18:27 -0800, "Tony Hain" said:
>
>> The top 100 websites: records and IPv6 connectivity
>>count with A: 98 ( 98.000%)
>> count with : 30 ( 30.000%)
>> Of the 30 hosts with AA
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 10:18:27 -0800, "Tony Hain" said:
> The top 100 websites: records and IPv6 connectivity
>count with A: 98 ( 98.000%)
> count with : 30 ( 30.000%)
> Of the 30 hosts with records, testing connectivity to TCP/80:
> count with
I question how one can have a top 100 website without an A record.
I am inclined to believe there is a bug in there somewhere.
Owen
On Nov 22, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Tony Hain wrote:
> Lee Howard wrote:
> ...
> There is obviously a long tail of ip4 destinations, but nearly all
> of 500 of
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet
Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, LacNOG,
TRNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group.
Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.ap
Lee Howard wrote:
...
> >> >There is obviously a long tail of ip4 destinations, but nearly all
> >> >of 500 of the Alexa global 500 have ip6 listeners,
> >>
> >> Do you have a data source for that? I see no indication of IPv6
> >> listeners on 85% of the top sites.
> >
> >A slightly different metr
Read the unifi forums (I was pretty active there when I was testing unifi
controller beta).
If that doesn't cure your fanboy feelings, you are doomed.
Sent from my Mobile Device.
Original message
From: Ray Soucy
Date: 11/22/2013 3:37 AM (GMT-09:00)
To: Seth Mos
Cc: NANOG
Le 22/11/2013 17:57, Chris Rogers a écrit :
> From my experience, networks that are capable of filtering from IRR objects
> generally filter for exact routes, meaning no "le 24".
Hi,
Are you sure? My experience is, with a small number of exceptions,
that "le 24" ('route' or 'route-set,' sometime
>From my experience, networks that are capable of filtering from IRR objects
generally filter for exact routes, meaning no "le 24". While I've always
found networks to be set in their ways, I know some people that have
managed to get their filters changed to allow longer prefixes without
needing ad
FWIW, I picked up a UniFi 3-pack of APs and built up a controller VM using
Ubuntu Server LTS and the beta multi-site controller code over the past
week.
I'm very impressed so far, it doesn't have all the bells and whistles of
Cisco setup, sure, but I'm pretty shocked at the level of functionality
Hi,
I have a question regarding what's the most common practice [1]
for transit ASs to filter prefixes from their BGP customers
when using IRR data. (which of course everyone does...)
Would many/most/all/none :
a) accept only the prefixes listed in route objects
or
b) accept these and anything "u
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2013/112113-sc13-gpus-would-make-terrific-276246.html
Super Computer 13: GPUs would make terrific network monitors
An off-the-shelf Nvidia GPU is able to easily capture all the traffic of a
10Gbps network, Fermilab research finds
By Joab Jackson, IDG News Servic
22 matches
Mail list logo
