On 03/12/13 02:54, Owen DeLong wrote:
I have talked to my bean counters. We give out /48s to anyone who wants them
and we don't charge for IPv6 address space.
There is some ISP who afraid their users will be reselling their
connectivity to other users around. While I didin't see that in years
On 2-12-2013 22:25, Ricky Beam wrote:
On Fri, 29 Nov 2013 08:39:59 -0500, Rob Seastrom r...@seastrom.com wrote:
Handing out /56's like Pez is just wasting address space -- someone *is*
paying for that space. Yes, it's waste; giving everyone 256 networks
You clearly have no understanding of
Cutler James R james.cut...@consultant.com writes:
Does this mean we can all get back to solving real IPv6 deployment and
operations problems?
I sure hope so. :)
I certainly hope you all can finally see which is the better business choice
between:
1. Using up to around 10% of IPv6
Hi NANOG!
We’d like to thank everyone who answered our survey on routing policies and
everyone who gave feedback on our presentation of preliminary survey results at
NANOG56 (https://www.nanog.org/meetings/abstract?id=1996 ).
A more complete exposition of the survey results will be appearing
Hello NANOG,
We're in the process of starting up an IXP in Philadelphia, and I wanted to
see if there were any networks that would be interested in connecting.
Currently, we have just over 10 networks that have expressed interest.
(Listed on http://phlix.net/) If you would like to be added,
On Dec 3, 2013, at 00:21 , Nikolay Shopik sho...@inblock.ru wrote:
On 03/12/13 02:54, Owen DeLong wrote:
I have talked to my bean counters. We give out /48s to anyone who wants them
and we don't charge for IPv6 address space.
There is some ISP who afraid their users will be reselling
Hi all,
We have a pool of around 100 file transfer clients. They reach out to
publicly addressed servers on the net to get and put files. Rather than burn
100 public v4 addresses for the clients, we've traditionally had these guys
behind a firewall performing source NAT/PAT overloading
1) why not just use public ips?
2) why not (if not 1) have more than 1 outbound path/nat-device?
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Andy Litzinger
andy.litzin...@theplatform.com wrote:
Hi all,
We have a pool of around 100 file transfer clients. They reach out to
publicly addressed servers on
In message 529d9492.8020...@inblock.ru, Nikolay Shopik writes:
On 03/12/13 02:54, Owen DeLong wrote:
I have talked to my bean counters. We give out /48s to anyone who wants
them and we don't charge for IPv6 add
ress space.
There is some ISP who afraid their users will be reselling their
Does anyone know anyone within ATT Uverse who actually knows what
TCP/IP is? Maybe even how to read a packet trace?
I've been trying to get my static IP block working again since Saturday
when they broke it while fixing an unrelated problem. I can't believe
how incompetent their tech support has
Ask to be escalated to Tier 2. If they can't help, ask for another escalation.
Show them traceroutes if you can (maybe from your phone or from one of us)
from other networks so they can see where it's dying.
From: Phil Karn k...@philkarn.net
To: NANOG
You need to talk to Alcatel Tac team. They will be able to help you. Prem
tech don't have the knowledge or resources. Tier one is useless and can only
do basic diagnostics., tier two won't be able to help but they can open an AOTS
ticket that can engage Alcatel Tac. Good luck. May need to
Reminder the submission period for NANOG 60 is still open, although the
deadline is approaching fast!
Thanks,
Greg
On Oct 30, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Greg Dendy wrote:
NANOG Community,
I hope everyone enjoyed NANOG 59 in Phoenix, NANOG’s largest attended meeting.
Fresh off a great meeting, and
13 matches
Mail list logo
