On 25 December 2013 00:03, Sam Moats wrote:
> On 2013-12-24 18:55, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>
>> On 2013-12-25 00:16, Sam Moats wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Nanog community,
>>> I would like to enlist your help with understanding this latency I'm
>>> seeing.
>>>
>>
>> You are likely seeing the effects of asym
On 2013-12-24 18:55, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2013-12-25 00:16, Sam Moats wrote:
Hello Nanog community,
I would like to enlist your help with understanding this latency I'm
seeing.
You are likely seeing the effects of asymmetric routing.
That's what I was thinking to.
[..]
Tracing route to
On 2013-12-25 00:16, Sam Moats wrote:
> Hello Nanog community,
> I would like to enlist your help with understanding this latency I'm
> seeing.
You are likely seeing the effects of asymmetric routing.
[..]
> Tracing route to xxx.yyy.ie [193.1.x.x]
www.heanet.ie by chance? :)
Though you could us
Wanted to wish everyone a Marry Christmas and all the best in the New Year!
Cheers
Ryan
Hello Nanog community,
I would like to enlist your help with understanding this latency I'm
seeing.
First some background,
I have Level3 circuits in the US and some services in Europe. From
Comcast to the US level3 IPs the performance is excellent. The same
traceroute to Europe is terrible. T
Hello J-NSP and Nanog members
Hopefully this is the right forum for this discussion - if not my apologies
for further clogging your inbox.
Here it goes:
Would you consider use of JSAM/WSAM to selectively proxy and tunnel certain
applications a form of split tunneling? The traditional concept of
6 matches
Mail list logo
