On Tuesday, January 07, 2014 12:47:45 PM Nick Hilliard
wrote:
it's the merchant silicon boxes which are driving high
density 10g prices down,...
As they should, and good news for us all, but...
but most of these boxes tends
to come with small fibs and tiny buffers which limits
their
On Monday, January 06, 2014 11:53:14 PM Randy Bush wrote:
the nice thing about buying bgp devices that can not hold
a full table is that you can expense them in the year of
purchase as opposed to amortizing them over 5 years or
so.
If only the bean counter saw things our way :-).
Mark.
On Tuesday, January 07, 2014 05:12:38 PM Aled Morris wrote:
In Europe, http://www.flexoptix.net are recommended.
They also sell blank modules and give you a programmer
too, so you can stock fewer spares and program them for
whatever vendor you need in an outage/rapid deployment
situation.
On 1/7/14, 11:10 PM, Adam Rothschild a...@latency.net wrote:
I should probably add that there was a real router plugged into the
ethernet port on the ONT, given a lack of support in the ActionTec
code ...
Interestingly, I have one of the later-generation ActionTecs, and VZ
pushed a software
On Wed, 8 Jan 2014, George, Wes wrote:
Interestingly, I have one of the later-generation ActionTecs, and VZ
pushed a software update to it at some point and it sprouted IPv6 config.
I noticed the same thing on my router several months ago, but when I
called to see if I could get IPv6 turned
The only major ISP that I seen so far that has rolled out is Comcast. Been
probing the TW Cable people for months to see what their plans are for IPv6
in Ohio and all I have gotten is a million different stories.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 5:29 AM, Justin M. Streiner
strei...@cluebyfour.orgwrote:
Hi,
We have a new requirement to load balance across a couple of point to point
ethernet links.
The previous solution was handled by a few TDM circuits and MLPPP so that
traffic was load balanced and any fragmentation/reassembly was handled by
ML/PPP.
Load balancing per flow is not really an
On 1/8/14 9:34 AM, Brian Henson marin...@gmail.com wrote:
The only major ISP that I seen so far that has rolled out is Comcast. Been
probing the TW Cable people for months to see what their plans are for
IPv6
in Ohio and all I have gotten is a million different stories.
TWC Ohio (residential
Dear colleagues,
We are currently experiencing a technical outage. Our engineers are currently
trying to resolve the issue.
We will provide updates as the situation changes.
Regards,
Mirjam Kuehne
RIPE NCC
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Lee Howard l...@asgard.org wrote:
I've read in some forums that there are pockets of FiOS users with IPv6
running. I've seen LLA on ActionTec modems. Something tells me that they
will sneak up on us with a sudden deployment.
would be grand if they'd let folk
Looking for EIGRP support in a platform other than Cisco. Since it was
opened up last year. We have a situation where we need to integrate into a
network running EIGRP and would like to avoid cisco if at all possible.
Any thoughts?
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(855) FLSPEED x106
My actiontec router has had that IPv6 page for a while now. I'm 20
minutes outside NYC. However when I enable it, I still don't get a
broadband IPv6 address in the System Monitoring tab.
On 1/8/2014 8:26 AM, George, Wes wrote:
On 1/7/14, 11:10 PM, Adam Rothschild a...@latency.net wrote:
I
On Jan 9, 2014, at 12:30 AM, Nick Olsen n...@flhsi.com wrote:
Any thoughts?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-savage-eigrp-01
---
Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net // http://www.arbornetworks.com
Luck is the residue
On 08/01/2014 17:30, Nick Olsen wrote:
Looking for EIGRP support in a platform other than Cisco. Since it was
opened up last year. We have a situation where we need to integrate into a
network running EIGRP and would like to avoid cisco if at all possible.
Why not use isis or ospf? Both are
Completely agree. But this is needed to integrate into an existing network.
OSPF would've been my first choice.
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(855) FLSPEED x106
From: Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 12:50 PM
To:
On Jan 9, 2014, at 12:50 AM, Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org wrote:
IGP migration is quite do-able, even for large networks, and all cisco
+1
---
Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net // http://www.arbornetworks.com
On Jan 9, 2014, at 12:52 AM, Nick Olsen n...@flhsi.com wrote:
But this is needed to integrate into an existing network.
Route redistribution?
cringe
or eBGP?
---
Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net //
On 08/01/2014 17:52, Nick Olsen wrote:
Completely agree. But this is needed to integrate into an existing network.
OSPF would've been my first choice.
you'll need to pay cisco tax then. Cisco opened up most of eigrp to the
ietf as an informational rfc, but didn't release anything related to
This is what I figured from a quick googling. Just wanted to make sure I
wasn't missing anything..
Thanks!
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(855) FLSPEED x106
From: Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 1:03 PM
To:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Nick Olsen n...@flhsi.com wrote:
This is what I figured from a quick googling. Just wanted to make sure I
wasn't missing anything..
you could employ one of the several methods to migrate from 'less
desirable igp' to 'more desirable igp' on all of the things in
On 1/8/14, 10:02 AM, Dobbins, Roland wrote:
On Jan 9, 2014, at 12:52 AM, Nick Olsen n...@flhsi.com wrote:
But this is needed to integrate into an existing network.
Route redistribution?
I've done mixed eigrp ospf environments in places where I wasn't
responsible for legacy decisions...
Use a standard protocol and redistribute between the two. OSPF is likely
the easiest way to go for this.
I like EIGRP, but I don't think I like it enough to try a non-Cisco
implementation of it. At least with OSPF you know that most of the bugs
have been worked out (hopefully).
On Wed, Jan 8,
Just to toss in a few more vendors so not to look biased:
Champion One:
http://www.championone.net/
Have used them with no complaints.
And a new company I heard about off-list:
Luma Optics:
http://www.lumaoptics.net/
I haven't dealt with them before, but their solution seems to be pretty
That´s actually a topic, I was thinking ago some time ago. Why not take
a current TOR switch with 1. BGP support and 2. high buffer. Like
mentioned above we have Trident 2 bases switches. HP (no recommendation)
has its HP 5930 series but tells Routing table size 16000 entries
(IPv4), 8000 entries
On (2014-01-08 13:56 -0500), Ray Soucy wrote:
Just to toss in a few more vendors so not to look biased:
Instead of suggesting names, I'm giving some suggestions want to ask for
vendor when looking for new partner
- DDM/DOM, should be included in each (1USD price premium), min/max TX/RX in
On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 09:45:50 PM excel...@gmx.com
wrote:
That´s actually a topic, I was thinking ago some time
ago. Why not take a current TOR switch with 1. BGP
support and 2. high buffer. Like mentioned above we have
Trident 2 bases switches. HP (no recommendation) has its
HP
On 1/8/14, 11:45 AM, excel...@gmx.com wrote:
That´s actually a topic, I was thinking ago some time ago. Why not take
a current TOR switch with 1. BGP support and 2. high buffer. Like
mentioned above we have Trident 2 bases switches. HP (no recommendation)
has its HP 5930 series but tells
From: Justin M. Streiner [mailto:strei...@cluebyfour.org]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 6:02 PM
If you find the answer, you win the prize.
Can the prize be the Verizon employees that should have been keeping us in
the loop on this in a dunk tank ;)?
I've tried shaking numerous trees
From: Adam Rothschild [mailto:a...@latency.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 8:10 PM
Sorry, yes, that is correct: one way to get IPv6 FIOS at the home is
to escalate through your (701/VZB) account team.
Hmm, I actually have business FIOS at home (static IP highway robbery
grumble), and
I've been barking at them for a couple years now, I never get much.
They're good about staffing their front line support with flowchart
monkeys. My internet facing device is constantly listening for any sort of
indication that native IPv6 is starting up, but never hears anything. So I
rock HE
OK. So who other than Andrew was able to get this working (and keep it
working) ?
I'm about to place an order for slow-verse for my residence...
-Z-
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Nikolay Shopik sho...@inblock.ru wrote:
On 04/12/13 23:48, Owen DeLong wrote:
Please tell me what provider is
On Wed, 8 Jan 2014, Ian Bowers wrote:
So I rock HE like many of you. It works pretty well, and I'm, guessing
I get a lot more address space via HE than VZ would give me.
I have a tunnel through HE and it is solid.
Verizon states on their What is IPv6? page that they will provide a /56
to
From: Ian Bowers [mailto:iggd...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 5:31 AM
indication that native IPv6 is starting up, but never hears anything. So
I
rock HE like many of you. It works pretty well, and I'm, guessing I get a
lot more address space via HE than VZ would give me.
I
HE will give you five /64's and you can also get a /48 if you need more
for one end point. The service works flawlessly; much more than can be
said for VZW. I run it from DD-WRT-based router at home and have
several office locations using it via Cisco gear. Would still greatly
prefer native
On Jan 8, 2014, at 18:27 , David Hubbard dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com wrote:
HE will give you five /64's and you can also get a /48 if you need more
for one end point. The service works flawlessly; much more than can be
said for VZW. I run it from DD-WRT-based router at home and have
On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 10:33:55 PM joel jaeggli
wrote:
There are various reasons why one might take a full table
on a switch with not not enough FIB, the important part
of course being the part where you don't install them
all.
In Metro-E deployments, this is a good use-case when
On Jan 8, 2014, at 17:03, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote:
I have a tunnel through HE and it is solid.
I'm on Verizon FIOS (70/30 Mbit/s), and set up my ActionTec router
to allow tunneling traffic through, but am using my Apple TimeCapsule
base station (3 years old) for the
On Wed, 8 Jan 2014, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2014-01-08 13:56 -0500), Ray Soucy wrote:
Just to toss in a few more vendors so not to look biased:
Instead of suggesting names, I'm giving some suggestions want to ask for
vendor when looking for new partner
So, in other words, you should make
Xtreme x480 can do this and has upto 6 * 10G ports.
It can actually hold a full bgp table also and is preatty cheap.
// Andreas
Med vänlig hälsning
Andreas Larsen
IP-Only Telecommunication AB| Postadress: 753 81 UPPSALA | Besöksadress: S:t
Persgatan 6, Uppsala |
Telefon: +46 (0)18 843 10 00 |
39 matches
Mail list logo
