On (2014-06-25 22:45 +0200), Pieter Hulshoff wrote:
> chosen communication protocol. This will in part depend on the customer
> feedback I get, which currently range from our current layer-2 solution to a
> web interface to a CLI. If we go layer-3, we'll probably use a standard like
> SSL/TLS for
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sV45Klc3tiE&sns=em
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VHjlvHdrmSQ&sns=em
two good, fairly detailed video by ISC.
> On Jun 26, 2014, at 3:16 AM, Abuse Contact
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> So I'm new to owning my own IPs. I want to setup multiple locations for a
> new servic
Hello,
So I'm new to owning my own IPs. I want to setup multiple locations for a
new service that I'm starting , one location in the USA East and one
location in the USA West (to get started). I originally thought that IP
Anycasting happened when you have to get a IP Transit from a T1 network
like
CALL FOR PAPERS
Ninth Workshop on Secure Network Protocols (NPSec 2014)
Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
October 21, 2014
In conjunction with the 22nd IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols
(ICNP 2014)
Web page: http://netsec.cs.uoregon.edu/npsec2014
Important dates
Submission D
On Cisco equipment supporting MACsec, EAP and MKA is of course configured
through the normal cli.
On Wednesday, June 25, 2014, Pieter Hulshoff wrote:
> On 25-06-14 22:45, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>> today you program the key (on switches that do macsec, not in an SFP
>> that does it for you, c
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Pieter Hulshoff wrote:
> On 25-06-14 22:45, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>>
>> today you program the key (on switches that do macsec, not in an SFP
>> that does it for you, cause those don't exist, yet) in your router
>> config and as near as I have seen there isn't a
On 25-06-14 22:45, Christopher Morrow wrote:
today you program the key (on switches that do macsec, not in an SFP
that does it for you, cause those don't exist, yet) in your router
config and as near as I have seen there isn't a key distribution
protocol aside from that which you write/manage you
On 25-06-14 22:17, John Schiel wrote:
Would be nice if we knew what the protocol was that communicated this
information down to the SFP and would also be nice if that was an open
protocol subject to review. UDP something? is my guess but ow do those
messages look?
I'm new to the MACsec idea b
>protocol was that communicated this information down to the SFP
For EEPROM access in a SFP+ it's I2C with is well documented and used in tons
of embedded stuff .. commercial logic analysis tools can handle this protocol,
as can your average $10 Arudrino.
Of course writing certain parts of the
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:17 PM, John Schiel wrote:
> Would be nice if we knew what the protocol was that communicated this
> information down to the SFP and would also be nice if that was an open
> protocol subject to review. UDP something? is my guess but ow do those
> messages look?
today you
Would be nice if we knew what the protocol was that communicated this
information down to the SFP and would also be nice if that was an open
protocol subject to review. UDP something? is my guess but ow do those
messages look?
I'm new to the MACsec idea but I would hope we could watch for such key
NANOGer's -
There are going to be two ICANN sessions tomorrow in the area of
coordination of Internet
identifiers: the first one is about "Enhancing ICANN Accountability", and
the second session
is on the "Transition of Stewardship of the IANA Functions".
If you are interest
Damnit, I hate non RFC 2919 compliant mailers. Sorry.
- Original Message -
> From: "Jay Ashworth"
> To: "NANOG"
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 10:17:25 AM
> Subject: Re: [VoiceOps] Monitoring tools
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Joseph Jackson"
>
> > Check out Homer @ htt
- Original Message -
> From: "Joseph Jackson"
> Check out Homer @ http://sipcapture.org we love it. There is also a
> commercial version that has more features / support.
Well, I don't know if Homer hsa the realtime viz tool I'm looking for,
but if it lives up to the attitude of it's web
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 8:40 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2014-06-25 05:09 -0700), Eric Flanery (eric) wrote:
>
> > That said, I do think the separately tunable tunable transmitters and
> > receivers could be huge, especially if they came at only a reasonably
> small
>
> I don't think this technolo
On (2014-06-25 05:09 -0700), Eric Flanery (eric) wrote:
> That said, I do think the separately tunable tunable transmitters and
> receivers could be huge, especially if they came at only a reasonably small
I don't think this technology exists. The receivers are always wideband and
there is some f
Those 'proposals' are really just things that would have been useful in
module form at one point or another, not necessarily anything that I've
given any serious thought to what sort of market they would have. Some are
probably impractical, some would probably be far too expensive to actually
be us
That's a large number of proposals. :) I'll have a chat with some
colleagues about the types outside my areas of expertise to see what
they think about it.
You're not the first to mention separately tunable transmitters and
receivers. Do you think there would be a great demand for this device?
18 matches
Mail list logo
