Rest of the article for those interested/lazy:
http://englishrussia.com/2014/07/07/do-they-have-internet-connection-on-the-arctic-icebreaker/
Seems like most ships I've seen...satellite communication is nothing
new/crazy.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net
Anyone know what happened? I've started to see a large number of bounces from
them (this caused a large number of people with their e-mail hosted there to be
removed from mailing lists I host).
Offlist replies/pointers to what I'm doing wrong are welcome.
- Jared
I'm adjusting mailman now to do this hoping that's it. It's on the
privacy-sender tab.
If you got unsubscribed from cisco-nsp or juniper-nsp this morning this is
likely why.
(ugh, 56 lists to adjust)..
- Jared
On Jul 9, 2014, at 10:32 AM, Matthew Black matthew.bl...@csulb.edu wrote:
If
If you find users being dropped from mailing lists, it's probably a
DMARC issue. Contact your mailing list vendor for appropriate patches.
or let them drop and hopr they move to a standards-compliant email home.
they're not called yahoos for nothing.
randy
it's not clear (to me at least) that hotmail has deployed any DMARC
config at all, actually:
$ dig txt _dmarc.hotmail.com +short
$ dig txt _dmarc.outlook.com +short
no results... but:
$ dig txt _dmarc.gmail.com +short
v=DMARC1\; p=none\; rua=mailto:mailauth-repo...@google.com;
On Wed, Jul 9,
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Christopher Morrow
morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
it's not clear (to me at least) that hotmail has deployed any DMARC
Don't let that stop others from offering leftfield advice. :-)
According to MailOP, Yahoo had acceptability issues as well this AM.
-Jim P.
On Jul 9, 2014, at 11:04 AM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
it's not clear (to me at least) that hotmail has deployed any DMARC
config at all, actually:
$ dig txt _dmarc.hotmail.com +short
$ dig txt _dmarc.outlook.com +short
no results... but:
$ dig txt
Looking for a good listing of US/Canada peering exchange, similar to
Torx in Toronto..Google map listing would be nice J
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer Author of Learn RouterOS-
Second Edition http://www.wlan1.com/product_p/mikrotik%20book-2.htm
Link Technologies, Inc --
On 9 July 2014 11:18, Dennis Burgess dmburg...@linktechs.net wrote:
Looking for a good listing of US/Canada peering exchange, similar to
Torx in Toronto.
http://www.dmoz.org/Computers/Internet/Routers_and_Routing/Internet_Exchanges/North_America/
C.
On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Dennis Burgess wrote:
Looking for a good listing of US/Canada peering exchange, similar to
Torx in Toronto..Google map listing would be nice J
Telegeography may have this
or:
https://prefix.pch.net/applications/ixpdir/
Dennis Burgess, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
PeeringDB www.peeringdb.com is the defacto source of truth.
Zaid
On Jul 9, 2014, at 11:18 AM, Dennis Burgess dmburg...@linktechs.net wrote:
Looking for a good listing of US/Canada peering exchange, similar to
Torx in Toronto..Google map listing would be nice J
Dennis Burgess,
On Jul 9, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Zaid A. Kahn z...@zaidali.com wrote:
PeeringDB www.peeringdb.com is the defacto source of truth.
That’s user-submitted data. The PCH directory is twenty years old, and is
independently verified by our staff. So what’s there isn’t always up-to-date,
but we do
On Jul 09, 2014, at 15:36 , Bill Woodcock wo...@pch.net wrote:
On Jul 9, 2014, at 11:35 AM, Zaid A. Kahn z...@zaidali.com wrote:
PeeringDB www.peeringdb.com is the defacto source of truth.
That’s user-submitted data. The PCH directory is twenty years old, and is
independently verified by
On Jul 9, 2014, at 12:46 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
Then again, PeeringDB never claimed to be anything but user-submitted data.
Just the opposite.
Exactly, not a criticism; PeeringDB’s focus is on peers, not on IXPs. The IXP
Directory’s focus is on IXPs, not peers.
On Jul 09, 2014, at 16:03 , Bill Woodcock wo...@pch.net wrote:
On Jul 9, 2014, at 12:46 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
Taking just Seattle IX (since I have a personal interest there :), it says
177 under “participants
Interesting. We pull automatically from the standard
On Jul 9, 2014, at 1:15 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
On Jul 09, 2014, at 16:03 , Bill Woodcock wo...@pch.net wrote:
it’s all automated with rulesets and a whole lot of exceptions (knowing that
AS 701, 702, 703 are the same organization, etc.).
Is that a good idea?
I’ve actually been working on a site like that for a while (with Google
Maps) - just never got around to putting it online. Honestly I wasn’t
sure if there was an interest in it :)
Paul
On 2014-07-09, 2:18 PM, Dennis Burgess dmburg...@linktechs.net wrote:
Looking for a good listing of
On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Paul Stewart wrote:
I?ve actually been working on a site like that for a while (with Google
Maps) - just never got around to putting it online. Honestly I wasn?t
sure if there was an interest in it :)
chop-chop! :)
Paul
On 2014-07-09, 2:18 PM, Dennis Burgess
--- larryshel...@cox.net wrote:
http://media.englishrussia.com/022013/icebcomm/icebreakercommunicationsystems001-37.jpg
In an article titled Do they have Internet on the Icebreaker?
---
I get: 403 Forbidden nginx/1.0.15
3mbps on a ship at 5:1 tdma oversubscribed is about 16k a month on c band and
probably about 12k a month on ku if you find someone with good water coverage
(ge23 is a good example of a killer oceanic spacecraft). The auto stabilized
antenna (at least 1.8m but preferably larger up to 3.6)is
--- wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote:
From: Warren Bailey wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com
3mbps on a ship at 5:1 tdma oversubscribed is about 16k a month on c band
---
There're 43200 minutes in a month. Just to be
Sure, Bro.
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
Original message
From: Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com
Date: 07/09/2014 5:55 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: No topic -- Photo in its context might be interesting...
---
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote:
Just to be fast, the article said 1.5Mbps
Also, I completely missed that there was a page 2. It looks like they use
Iridium. Here is some pricing. Just the first thing I found:
http://www.sattransusa.com/irprpl.html
Dennis Burgess dmburg...@linktechs.net writes:
Looking for a good listing of US/Canada peering exchange, similar to
Torx in Toronto..Google map listing would be nice J
Similar to Torx in Toronto, assuming you're OK with 4 points instead
of 6, would be Robertson/Scrulox. Get 'em at
On 7/9/14 7:24 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote:
Just to be fast, the article said 1.5Mbps
Also, I completely missed that there was a page 2. It looks like they use
Iridium. Here is some pricing. Just the first thing I found:
Which providers would this be?
And there are literally 3 in the entire world that don't completely suck.
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Warren Bailey
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 7:39 PM
To: sur...@mauigateway.com; nanog@nanog.org
Subject:
26 matches
Mail list logo
