On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:16:36AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On 28-Jul-2014 8:06 am, Matt Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 05:28:08PM -0700, Richard Bennett wrote:
It's more
Thus spake Jeremy (jba...@gmail.com) on Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 03:07:19PM -0700:
I'm currently working on writing some automation around the ASR9K platform
and I've been looking at both the netconf and xml interfaces. Anyone have
experience with either?
It looks like the XML interface is
I always preferred the displays where you have commands without all the
bracket garbage and just indented text for sub items.
On the MX the show configuration | display set is about as close as you
can get, but it¹s workable. Kudo¹s is that you can just dump it in as
well and get what you want.
On Aug 4, 2014, at 10:34 PM, mcfbbqroast . bbqro...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with this, a monopoly is ok if the government regulates it properly
and effectively.
I'm a fan of either:
Dark fibre to every house.
Fiber to every house with a soft handover to the ISP.
The problem with
And a bunch of ban's around Oct 2013 from a wide variety of
countries...
you mean fear of implants as there are in cisco products?
Kudo¹s is that you can just dump it in as well and get what you want.
You can dump hierarchical config (the bracket stuff) into JunOS with load
plus the added benefit/flexibility of the merge/replace/override options.
--
Hugo
On Tue 2014-Aug-05 13:42:18 +, Corey Touchet
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Eugeniu Patrascu eu...@imacandi.net
In my neck of the woods, the city hall decided that no more fiber cables
running all over the poles in the city and somehow combined with some EU
This one is a bad idea cause you have lots of people pushing fiber through
pipes with active fiber in them... and their incentives not to screw up
other people's glass are... unclear? :-)
Not really, if one company starts making mistakes, the other will also
mistake their cables. It's
Was more a statement of fact.
As if it was warranted. I do not know.
-
Alain Hebertaheb...@pubnix.net
PubNIX Inc.
50 boul. St-Charles
P.O. Box 26770 Beaconsfield, Quebec H9W 6G7
Tel: 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.netFax:
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:26 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
This one is a bad idea cause you have lots of people pushing fiber
through
pipes with active fiber in them... and their incentives not to screw up
other people's glass are... unclear? :-)
Not really, if one company
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:34 AM, mcfbbqroast . bbqro...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with this, a monopoly is ok if the government regulates it properly
and effectively.
I'm a fan of either:
Dark fibre to every house.
Fiber to every house with a soft handover to the ISP.
All ran by an entity
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Eugeniu Patrascu eu...@imacandi.net wrote:
So how is blowing microfibre in some tubes more expensive? You pay a one
off installation fee and then a small monthly rate for the circuit (payable
yearly).
The really nice and geeky part is that you can actually
To be fair, they've fixed one of the big concerns that were raised
with them a couple of years ago: google for huawei + psirt now
actually returns usable results. No idea how well the interface with
them works when you're actually trying to report a vulnerability
(maybe someone can speak up).
On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 9:26 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
Hi Eugeniu,
The word you're searching for is microduct.
That's it, I wasn't sure about it.
I'm a big fan of Microduct. There's even some wicked cool equipment
which will force the core out of in-place coax plant,
Section 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, as amended (1996 Act),
requires the Commission to determine and report annually on whether advanced
telecommunications capability is being deployed to all Americans in a
reasonable and timely fashion.
1) This Notice of Inquiry (Inquiry)
- Original Message -
From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
All ran by an entity forbidden from retail.
Nonononono, bad plan. I want a fiber from my home to my storefront on
main street, but I'm a consumer not a retailer so I can't buy just
one? Or hey, so sorry but the cable
Is there any way we could stop this discussion until we can get some
participants who have experience doing things like emergency
post-ice-storm overhead circuit restoration to show up and explain
exactly why charging a small one-time fee for a fiber from A to Z is
probably not a sustainable
Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.at writes:
In the meantime, I'd like to see the city where an ISP can buy as many
of the microducts as they want. I'd like to buy them all,
please... though I have no intention of running anything though them,
as I'm an investor in the local cable TV company.
On 2014-08-02 15:15, Leo Bicknell wrote:
But if those cities were to build a municipal fiber network like we've
described, and pay
for it with 15-20 year municipal bonds the ISP's wouldn't have to bear those
costs. They
could come in drop one box in a central location and start offering
19 matches
Mail list logo
