On Oct 27, 2014, at 12:58 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
LACNIC numbers (as a percent) are quite good, but my question
was why only RIPE has the very impressive total count of ROAs.
conjecture follows
of course one can never know. but i conject
o the are the largest registry
- Original Message -
From: Gregory Boyce gregory.bo...@gmail.com
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us
wrote:
I think that Debian's plan to allow multiple init systems
(irregardless of which one is default) is a bad plan. The
non-default
ones won't get
- Original Message -
From: Chris Adams c...@cmadams.net
Once upon a time, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com said:
Try to do everything *inside PID 1* is the real problem.
And that is not what systemd is doing; make sure you know what you are
complaining about. systemd-the-project !=
Original Message -
From: Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Barry Shein b...@world.std.com
wrote:
And you whisk all that away with it's not really clear to me that
'reboots in
after watching this discussion for a while, i have decided that i am in favour
of systemd.
i encourage its development, and widespread adoption.
it will hasten the demise of linux in the server enviroment, which can only
be a good thing.
if people really want to run their servers on the *nix
We get lots of probes from subdomains of southwestdoor.com and
secureserver.net 's SOA and I'm curious who these guys are?
The only web page I could find was southwestdoor redirects to
http://www.arcadiacustoms.com and then to http://arcadia-custom.com/
(a hardware company is causing unwanted
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
I will stipulate this use case.
I will counter with you wouldn't be running a real distro in that
case anyway; you'd be running something super trimmed down, and possibly
custom built, or based on something like CoreOS,
There are boxes that do that, but it’s really not a good solution… Here’s why:
1. TV signals in NTSC max out at 640x480. In ATSC, you get up to 1920x1080.
Many monitors today are capable of 2560x1440 or more.
2. It’s expensive and has few advantages over a traditional KVM
- Original Message -
From: Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
wrote:
I will stipulate this use case.
I will counter with you wouldn't be running a real distro in that
case anyway; you'd be running something super
Ok, got a few off list replies that secureserver.net is godaddy which
is fine - makes sense. I just wish this would link back to them easier
(some backup ns being something.godaddy.com or some SOA of an IP
listed in the spf being something.godaddy.com or whatever).
Thank y'all for the info.
On
Oh and along that line of trying to find the source - nothing
indicates godaddy here (kinda annoying):
% curl -I secureserver.net
~ swlap1
HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store, must-revalidate
Pragma: no-cache
Content-Length: 145
Expires: 0
Location:
On October 24, 2014 at 19:34 d...@virtualized.org (David Conrad) wrote:
Barry,
On Oct 24, 2014, at 12:13 PM, Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote:
I believe this never-ending quest for more reliable domain
registration data is being driven by intellectual property lawyers to
lower
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Barry Shein wrote:
I disagree. Perhaps my age is showing, but I believe the whole point of the
registration database is to provide contact information to allow someone to contact the
registrant for whatever reason, e.g., hey, stop that!.
It's the old problem, crooks don't
We're seeing issues deliving email to certain .mil domains. MX hosts
for these domains are not responding on port 25 and have verified from
off-network as well.
Anyone else seeing the same or can point me to a technical POC to start
with?
navy.mil, usmc.mil, uscg.mil are just a few that seem to
As some of you may know, we recently took over ZoneEdit.com and it's
customer base.
We've found a domain on the system: rbl.orbitrbl.com which is delegated
to zoneedit nameservers, broken (it is not allowed to zone transfer from
it's designated master), unresponsive (account owner is not
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 10:52:07AM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
We're seeing issues deliving email to certain .mil domains. MX hosts
for these domains are not responding on port 25 and have verified from
off-network as well.
Anyone else seeing the same or can point me to a technical POC to
On 10/25/2014 04:55 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
Completely agree on this point--but I fail to see why it has to be one
or the other? Why can't systemd have a --text flag to tell it to
output in ascii text mode for those of us who prefer it that way?
It still logs to syslog, and syslog can still
Those all appear to be going through DISA's Enterprise Email system.
http://www.disa.mil/Services/Computing/~/media/Files/DISA/Services/Computing/DECCServiceDeskContact.pdf
If they don't have an option specifically for Enterprise Email, try
contacting the extension for Oklahoma City.
On 10/27/2014 11:35 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
I will counter with you wouldn't be running a real distro in that
case anyway; you'd be running something super trimmed down, and
possibly custom built, or based on something like CoreOS, that only
does one job. Well.
Hmm, now this one I wasn't
Lamar Owen wrote:
On 10/27/2014 11:35 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
I will counter with you wouldn't be running a real distro in that
case anyway; you'd be running something super trimmed down, and
possibly custom built, or based on something like CoreOS, that only
does one job. Well.
Hmm, now
On Oct 24, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Eric Brunner-Williams brun...@nic-naa.net
wrote:
On 10/23/14 7:27 PM, David Conrad wrote:
in other words, the bc and ispc were, and for the most part, imho, remain
captive properties of the intellectual property constituency.
Here, Eric is suggesting the
On Mon, 27 Oct 2014, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
On 10/27/14 10:12 AM, goe...@anime.net wrote:
If you can't be bothered to have correct contact info, your packets go into
the scavenger queue. Or get redirected to a webpage explaining why your
network is blocked until you correct it.
Your
Greetings NANOG Folks,
It was great to see so many of you (~700) at NANOG 62 in Baltimore.
NANOG will hold its 63rd meeting in San Antonio, TX on February 2-4, 2015,
hosted by CyrusOne.
The NANOG Program Committee is now seeking proposals for presentations,
panels, tutorials, tracks sessions,
Equinix is now hiring a Network Architect to help design the next-generation of
interconnection platforms, come join a great team.
http://equinix.hodesiq.com/job_detail.asp?JobID=4652823user_id=
Interested, or know someone that is? Apply online, or let me know.
Greg
Barry,
On Oct 27, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote:
Oh no! The Four Horsement of the Infocalypse!
Being dismissive of concerns related to illegal activities that make use of the
DNS does not, of course, make those concerns go away. A number of folks make
use of the
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams
brun...@nic-naa.net wrote:
some history.
at the montevideo icann meeting (september, 2001), there were so few
attendees to either the ispc (now ispcp) and the bc (still bc), that these
two meetings merged. at the paris icann meeting
On October 27, 2014 at 15:34 d...@virtualized.org (David Conrad) wrote:
Barry,
On Oct 27, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote:
Oh no! The Four Horsement of the Infocalypse!
Being dismissive of concerns related to illegal activities that make use of
the DNS
You sure it's not a DNS issue? I've had problems resolving various
*.disa.mil sites today. Google DNS claims they don't exist.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ray Van Dolson
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 1:52 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Whois's primary purpose is to keep the network running. CP, IP,
LEO are all secondary issues. This tends to get lost.
I can easily contact all the TLD operators using whois data and do
so from time to time when I see issues with the servers. The one
time I couldn't (both email addresses
On 10/27/14 9:27 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
There are boxes that do that, but it’s really not a good solution… Here’s why:
1.TV signals in NTSC max out at 640x480. In ATSC, you get up to 1920x1080.
Many monitors today are capable of 2560x1440 or more.
2.It’s expensive and has few
30 matches
Mail list logo
