Re: DDOS, IDS, RTBH, and Rate limiting

On 2 Dec 2014, at 17:18, Pavel Odintsov wrote: In near future I will add netflow v5 support. Good job - you should really go for NetFlow v9 when you can, as it supports IPv6 and MPLS labels. Next would be IPFIX. --- Roland Dobbins

Re: DDOS, IDS, RTBH, and Rate limiting

Hello, folks! Thank you for a very useful feedback! I'm so sorry for my negative vision of netflow :( It's nice protocol but I haven't equpment with ability to generate netflow on wire speed and I use mirror/SPAN instead. I competely redesigned attack-analyzer subsystem and can process sampled da

Re: DDOS, IDS, RTBH, and Rate limiting

Hello, folks! Thank you for a very useful feedback! I'm so sorry for my negative vision of netflow :( It's nice protocol but I haven't equpment with ability to generate netflow on wire speed and I use mirror/SPAN instead. I competely redesigned attack-analyzer subsystem and can process sampled da

Re: PeeringDB missing NOC role option?

And to answer myself. If you select "Ops." it will display NOC as the role on the regular display page. On 14-12-01 10:20 AM, Greg Estabrooks wrote: > > > Hey All, > > > Has anyone else notice the NOC option missing from their PeeringDB contacts? > > > I went to update our contact to

Re: Phasing out of copper

Invoke Kushnick's Law * 'A regulated company will always renege on promises to provide public benefits tomorrow in exchange for regulatory and financial benefits today.'* On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 9:51 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei < jfmezei_na

Re: Phasing out of copper

On 14-12-02 21:16, Owen DeLong wrote: > Depends on your desired outcome and goals. However… Context: Canadian incumbents deny to the regulator that they have intentions to turn off copper. (but to shareholders, openly say they will shut it donw, howveer, they plan only to shutdown active equipment

Re: Phasing out of copper

Depends on your desired outcome and goals. However… I would think that rather than trying to convince regulators that you know better than the incumbents what they intend to do, it makes more sense to explain to regulators why maintaining copper once sufficient FTTP adoption is complete is fool

Hibernia/Atrato contacts

Hi, Does anyone have a contact for a sales/account manager at Hibernia/Atrato located in the UK timezone or even +1? Please contact me off list with the details. Thanks, Alistair

Re: Buying IP Bandwidth Across a Peering Exchange

> On Nov 25, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote: > > > On Nov 25, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Colton Conor wrote: >> I know typically peering exchanges are made for peering traffic between >> providers, but can you buy IP transit from a provider on an exchange? An >> example, buy a 10G port on an e

Global Switch Singapore - OOB IP

Hi all Realise this may not be the best place to post this, but currently looking for someone in MMR1 in Global Switch SG who can provide a low speed IP link for OOB. Copper hand off, no BGP peering required. Off-list replies welcome Cheers Cameron

Re: [NANOG-announce] NANOG 63 - San Antonio - Call for Presentations is Open!

Hi folks, I'm writing as a reminder that the NANOG Program Committee is still soliciting proposals for NANOG63. This Friday, December 5th, is when we'd like to have at least an Abstract posted to the PC Tool website. The Abstract needn't be that detailed but then we on the P

Google IP Engineering Contact

Can someone at Google that has some control over how Google’s system that says an IP is suddenly in Iran please contact me off list ASAP. We can not wait a month for your tool to remove this. Also in the future that tool needs to ping the ip and check the RTT time and compare to well establish

Publix Super Markets, Inc. PUBLIX-S51-11

Can someone from Publix contact me off list? You're dropping traffic from legitimate networks. Brent Meshier | Amherst Holdings, LLC | 5001 Plaza on the Lake, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78746 | T: 512-342-3010 --- Please refer to http://www.amherst.com/amherst-email-disclaimer/ for important discl