Hi everyone,
I'm reading Randy's Zhang BGP Design and Implementation and I found
following guidelines about designing RR-based MPLS VPN architecture:
- Partition RRs
- Move RRs out of the forwarding path
- Use a high-end processor with maximum memory
- Use peer groups
- Tune RR routers for
On Wednesday, December 31, 2014, Marcin Kurek not...@marcinkurek.com
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm reading Randy's Zhang BGP Design and Implementation and I found
following guidelines about designing RR-based MPLS VPN architecture:
- Partition RRs
- Move RRs out of the forwarding path
- Use a
On 31/12/2014 12:08, Marcin Kurek wrote:
I'm reading Randy's Zhang BGP Design and Implementation and I found
following guidelines about designing RR-based MPLS VPN architecture:
- Partition RRs
- Move RRs out of the forwarding path
- Use a high-end processor with maximum memory
- Use peer
Hello Guys,
So, is there anyone responsible by domain messagelabs.com here at list?
I'm trying contact them , but no successful.
Tks and Happy Holidays
Welisson Tomé
Far too much discussion on this IMO. If you're that paranoid about it,
just use the nuclear launch keys approach. Create the local account
password, split it, give half of it to one party, half to the other. Then
two separate parties must be engaged to use the account. Done.
Sincerely,
Clay
On 12/31/14 4:08 AM, Marcin Kurek wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm reading Randy's Zhang BGP Design and Implementation and I found
following guidelines about designing RR-based MPLS VPN architecture:
- Partition RRs
- Move RRs out of the forwarding path
I'd find it odd if the RR were the nexthop for
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 01:08:15PM +0100, Marcin Kurek wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm reading Randy's Zhang BGP Design and Implementation and I found
following guidelines about designing RR-based MPLS VPN architecture:
- Partition RRs
- Move RRs out of the forwarding path
- Use a high-end
On (2014-12-31 12:05 -0500), Chuck Anderson wrote:
Hey,
are the RRs, via an MPLS LSP for example. That latter is fine in many
cases, the former is not. E.g. I would argue that a P-router can be
an RR if desired.
There is no compelling advantage. No budget is too thin for 3 gray NPE-G1, if
Hi,
Right, one is when besides forwarding packets a router also functioning as a
RR, another - when RR sets NH to itself and hence forces all the traffic to
pass thru the router in fast path.
Keep in mind - some architectures, such as seamless MPLS would require a RR to
be in the fast path.
- Move RRs out of the forwarding path
this remains contentious. there are those who think having the control
plane not congruent to the data plane is a recipe for really fun
debugging and has other issues.
randy
.
Yn
- Reply message -
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
To: Marcin Kurek not...@marcinkurek.com
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group nanog@nanog.org
Subject: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path?
Date: Wed, Dec 31, 2014 9:36 PM
- Move RRs out of the forwarding path
this remains
11 matches
Mail list logo