Hello all,
Thank you for insightful answers.
I was thinking mostly about the second scenario Chuck mentioned - where
some traffic naturally flows through the routers that are the RRs
because of MPLS LSP. Setting next-hop-self on all reflected routes would
be misconfiguration IMHO.
I am also
On 12/31/2014 6:08 AM, Marcin Kurek wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm reading Randy's Zhang BGP Design and Implementation and I found
following guidelines about designing RR-based MPLS VPN architecture:
- Partition RRs
- Move RRs out of the forwarding path
- Use a high-end processor with maximum memory
On 12/28/2014 5:02 PM, Robert Drake wrote:
3. authentication and authorization caching and/or something else
Is this related to the TACACS server being down and the long time out to
hit local authen/author? Sorry, a little late to this party :)
tv
Is there a good reason to use actual router hardware for the route
reflector role? Even a cheap server has more CPU and memory. If it is not
in the forwarding path, this is a computing task - not a move packets at
line speed task.
Are anyone using Bird, Quagga etc. for this?
Regards,
Baldur
On 01/01/2015 21:37, Baldur Norddahl wrote:
> Are anyone using Bird, Quagga etc. for this?
there are patches for both code-bases and some preliminary support for
vpnv4 in quagga, but other than that neither currently supports either ldp
or the vpnv4/vpnv6 address families in the main-line code.
N
You don't need LDP on RR as long as clients support "not on lsp" flag
(different implementation have different names for it)
There are more and more reasons to run RR on a non router HW, there are many
reasons to still run commercial code base, mostly feature set and resilience.
Regards,
Jeff
>
Running various functions on a couple small VM clusters makes a lot of sense.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Tantsura"
To: "Nick Hilliard"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, January 1, 2015 7:54:32
On Thursday, January 1, 2015, Mike Hammett wrote:
> Running various functions on a couple small VM clusters makes a lot of
> sense.
>
>
>
I agree, it makes some sense, especially if you are control plane bound.
But, nearly all my routers run between 1% and 10% cpu.
Ymmv. I have feeling that run
8 matches
Mail list logo
