Last call for signatures to the FCC on the wifi lockdown issue

2015-10-09 Thread Dave Taht
The CeroWrt project's letter to the FCC on how to better manage the software on wifi and home routers vs some proposed regulations is now in last call for signatures. The final draft of the FCC submittal is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15QhugvMlIOjH7iCxFdqJFhhwT6_nmYT2j8xAscCImX0/edit?

Re: /27 the new /24

2015-10-09 Thread Mike Hammett
Agreed. Often times people forget that budgets aren't unlimited and not everyone is in One Wilshire, 350 Cermak or 60 Hudson. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - F

Re: AW: AW: AW: /27 the new /24

2015-10-09 Thread Jérôme Nicolle
Hello James, Le 05/10/2015 06:45, James Jun a écrit : > I'm not aware of any carrier-grade network that operates on these things. With the availability of a 80Gbps model and upcoming updates to the routing process (in RouterOS 7), chances are these boxes will drag much more attention in the next

Re: /27 the new /24

2015-10-09 Thread Lee Howard
On 10/8/15, 6:45 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Mike" wrote: > > >On 10/08/2015 02:41 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: >> >> >> Plus one to that. We are such a provider, and IPv6 is on my list of >> things to implement, but the barriers are still plenty high. Firstly, I >> do have an Ipv6 assignmnt and bgp (v4

Re: Mikrotik in the DFZ (Was Re: AW: AW: /27 the new /24)

2015-10-09 Thread Jérôme Nicolle
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello William, Le 03/10/2015 10:23, William Waites a écrit : > I wish it were possible today to run different software on their > larger boxes. If some like-minded small providers wanted to get > together with us to fund a FreeBSD port to the CCR ro

Re: AW: AW: AW: /27 the new /24

2015-10-09 Thread Mike Hammett
I know of literally hundreds of ISPs using them in the US and I'm sure that number is in the thousands. After hearing complaints from larger networks of their larger gear... it's the same shit everyone else deals with. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.c

The continuing IPv6 discussion (was: /27 the new /24)

2015-10-09 Thread Stephen Satchell
I have been reviewing the proposed submission to the FCC ET Docket No. 15-170, regarding the requirement that vendors of wireless equipment "lock down" updates, and find this quote in that submission particularly apropos to the ongoing IPv6-on-wireless discussion: "Most Wi-Fi routers, even the

Re: /27 the new /24

2015-10-09 Thread Mike
On 10/08/2015 07:58 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: I can't remember the last time I saw a site stall due to reaching it over IPv6 it is that long ago. It happens every day for me, which only amplifies my perception that v6 IS NOT READY FOR PRIME TIME. Yet you refuse to troubleshoot your issues with

Re: /27 the new /24

2015-10-09 Thread Christopher Morrow
(I'm going to regret this but...) On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Mike wrote: > On 10/08/2015 07:58 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: >> >> >> I can't remember the last time I saw a site stall due to reaching it over >> IPv6 it is that long ago. >>> >>> It happens every day for me, which only amplifies my

Re: /27 the new /24

2015-10-09 Thread Stephen Satchell
On 10/09/2015 08:18 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote: (I'm going to regret this but...) No good deed ever goes unpunished. (I'm sure there's a Dune quote to be used here somewhere as well...) Indeed: "A beginning is the time for taking the most delicate care that the balances are co

Weekly Routing Table Report

2015-10-09 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing Working Group. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists.apnic.net For hi

Re: /27 the new /24

2015-10-09 Thread Scott Weeks
--- morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote: From: Christopher Morrow ... and trying to jam your favorite flavor of spam down the other person's throat is only going to make them hate hawaii. -- FYI... :-) http://www.thehawaiiplan.com/why-do-hawai

IP-Echelon Compliance

2015-10-09 Thread Baldur Norddahl
Hi I am sure all of you know of these guys. But what do you do when they keep spamming your abuse address with reports for illegal downloads from IP-addresses that are in no way related to our business? I tried contacting them. And was told repeatedly that I had to update whois information if I w

Re: /27 the new /24

2015-10-09 Thread Owen DeLong
> On Oct 8, 2015, at 11:24 PM, Jeremy Austin wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 3:25 PM, James Jun wrote: > >> >> If you want choices in your transit providers, you should get a transport >> circuit (dark, wave or EPL) to a nearby carrier hotel/data center. Once >> you do that, you will sudde

Re: /27 the new /24

2015-10-09 Thread Owen DeLong
> On Oct 9, 2015, at 10:22 AM, Mike wrote: > > On 10/08/2015 07:58 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: >> >> I can't remember the last time I saw a site stall due to reaching it over >> IPv6 it is that long ago. >>> It happens every day for me, which only amplifies my perception that v6 IS >>> NOT READY F

Re: IP-Echelon Compliance

2015-10-09 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > Hi > > I am sure all of you know of these guys. But what do you do when they keep > spamming your abuse address with reports for illegal downloads from > IP-addresses that are in no way related to our business? > fairly certian that nothing

Re: /27 the new /24

2015-10-09 Thread Jeremy Austin
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: > > > The future is here, but it isn't evenly distributed yet. I'm in North > America, but there are no IXPs in my *state*, let alone in my *continent* > -- from an undersea fiber perspective. There is no truly competitive IP > transit market wi

Re: IP-Echelon Compliance

2015-10-09 Thread Theodore Baschak
> On Oct 9, 2015, at 3:19 PM, Christopher Morrow > wrote: > > fairly certian that nothing ip-echelon sends is ever valid... > or there's enough 'clearly you are joking' mail from them that anyone > who ends up in court for 'ip echelon violations' could simply subpeona > their isp for 'other comp

Re: /27 the new /24

2015-10-09 Thread Mike Hammett
As I "know" Jeremy from elsewhere, I reached out to him this morning about this. I would like to speak with any other Alaskers? Alaskites? people from Alaska. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com

Re: IP-Echelon Compliance

2015-10-09 Thread Sean Donelan
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Christopher Morrow wrote: fairly certian that nothing ip-echelon sends is ever valid... or there's enough 'clearly you are joking' mail from them that anyone who ends up in court for 'ip echelon violations' could simply subpeona their isp for 'other complaints from ip echelon'

Re: IP-Echelon Compliance

2015-10-09 Thread Rich Kulawiec
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:00:19PM +0200, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > Do I just block them for spamming? Yes, since that's what they're doing. Consider: they're sending email. It's unsolicited (you did not ask for it by confirmed/closed-loop subscription). And it's bulk: these are not individual m

The Cidr Report

2015-10-09 Thread cidr-report
This report has been generated at Fri Oct 9 21:14:52 2015 AEST. The report analyses the BGP Routing Table of AS2.0 router and generates a report on aggregation potential within the table. Check http://www.cidr-report.org/2.0 for a current version of this report. Recent Table History Date

BGP Update Report

2015-10-09 Thread cidr-report
BGP Update Report Interval: 01-Oct-15 -to- 08-Oct-15 (7 days) Observation Point: BGP Peering with AS131072 TOP 20 Unstable Origin AS Rank ASNUpds % Upds/PfxAS-Name 1 - AS45025 598385 11.4% 31493.9 -- EDN-AS Online Technologies LTD,UA 2 - AS22561 2430

RE: IP-Echelon Compliance

2015-10-09 Thread Matthew Black
If the IP addresses, hostnames, or domain names are not yours, why would you even bother responding? IANAL, I don't think it's your responsibility to direct them to the correct place. Consider an auto-responder directing them to the DMCA page of your corporate website. matthew black california

Re: IP-Echelon Compliance

2015-10-09 Thread Fred Hollis
Oh, interesting you have the same? We receive thousands of these complains on daily basis that are not related to any of our IPs. Of course we contacted them... but never got a response. On 09.10.2015 at 22:00 Baldur Norddahl wrote: Hi I am sure all of you know of these guys. But what do you