Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

2015-12-11 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 23 November 2015 at 20:05, Owen DeLong wrote: > >> On Nov 23, 2015, at 17:28 , Baldur Norddahl >> wrote: >> >> On 24 November 2015 at 00:22, Owen DeLong wrote: >> >>> Are there a significant number (ANY?) streaming video providers using UDP >>> to deliver their streams? >>> >> >> What else c

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

2015-12-11 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 23 November 2015 at 20:45, Mark Andrews wrote: > T-Mo could have just increased the data limits by the data usage > of 7x24 standard definition video stream and achieved the same thing > in a totally network neutral way. Instead they choose to play > favourites with a type of technology. 1,5M

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

2015-12-11 Thread Rich Brown
> On Dec 11, 2015, at 7:00 AM, Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Christopher Morrow said: >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 1:07 PM, William Kenny >> wrote: >>> is that still net neutrality? >> >> who cares? mobile was excepted from the NN rulings. > > Any why the desire for extra regulation

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

2015-12-11 Thread William Herrin
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote: > On 2015-12-10 21:39, William Herrin wrote: >> Personally, I'm not opposed to this. When each packet has one payer, >> it doesn't much matter whether the payer is sender or recipient. > > If the retail customer pays for $70 for 100 gigs

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

2015-12-11 Thread William Herrin
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > I disable VPN (which they limit to 128kbps as per above), and suddenly > Netflix starts working just fine, since it now gets 1.5Mbps (or > thereabouts), and 480p works just fine, even if you're tethered. But > yet my porn still does

AOL emails bouncing back certain domains

2015-12-11 Thread Hough, Aaron
The following problem has been acknowledged and yet, has been persisting for weeks unfortunately: "Apparently, email messages ( that with the @aol.com domain ) bounces to and in some occasions, from multiple domains and comes up with Error 521. This has been escalated already. As of writing, we

Weekly Routing Table Report

2015-12-11 Thread Routing Analysis Role Account
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG, PaNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to bgp-st...@lists

Looking for a Network Solution contact

2015-12-11 Thread Eric Sieg
If you could contact me off list, i'd appreciate it.

Re: AOL emails bouncing back certain domains

2015-12-11 Thread Blake Hudson
Aaron, I reported an issue here almost a month ago (521 5.2.1 : AOL will not accept delivery of this message). AOL support did, eventually, acknowledge an issue and the failed deliveries did, eventually, clear up for us. AOL support never stated what the issue was nor did they provide any expla

John McAfee: Massive DDoS attack on the internet was from smartphone botnet on popular app

2015-12-11 Thread Jay Ashworth
Is McAfee just talking to dry his teeth here? This isn't actually practical, is it? Carriers would notice, right? http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/john-mcafee-massive-ddos-attack-internet-was-smartphone-botnet-popular-app-1532993 -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: John McAfee: Massive DDoS attack on the internet was from smartphone botnet on popular app

2015-12-11 Thread Colin Johnston
saw a lot of bad traffic from china mobile more recently, hard to solve since abuse reports ignored. colin Sent from my iPhone > On 12 Dec 2015, at 06:18, Jay Ashworth wrote: > > Is McAfee just talking to dry his teeth here? This isn't actually practical, > is it? Carriers would notice, r