Re: Nat

On 12/19/2015 07:17 AM, Sander Steffann wrote: Hi Jeff, It's far past time to worry about architectural purity. We need people deploying IPv6 *NOW*, and it needs to be the job of the IETF, at this point, to fix the problems that are causing people not to deploy. I partially agree with you.

Re: CPE that supports 464XLAT

On Thursday, January 7, 2016, Daniel Corbe wrote: > Anyone out there aware of any DOCSIS 3.0 cable modems that have a working > CLAT implementation? > > Not modems, but home gateway routers NEC has a product http://www.necat.co.jp/en/ipv6/index.html And it is supported

Re: GPON vs. GEPON

At this point if you haven't deployed any of these system, make sure you know the road map of your vendor for N-GPON2 that is going to be the next wave of deployed pon systems. https://www.calix.com/solutions/next-generation-pon.html ​ Carlos Alcantar Race Communications / Race Team Member

Re: SMS gateways

Based on a cursory pass of the FB website I can't find any of their products that have a CDMA modem - so they're definitely incorrect in that sense. Voice, text, 2G and 3G data are all CDMA on Verizon, unless you're doing something with SMS over IMS which is only supported with LTE capable

CPE that supports 464XLAT

Anyone out there aware of any DOCSIS 3.0 cable modems that have a working CLAT implementation?

Re: Nat

On 12/18/2015 01:20 PM, Lee Howard wrote: On 12/17/15, 1:59 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Matthew Petach" I'm still waiting for the IETF to come around to allowing feature parity between IPv4 and IPv6 when it comes to DHCP. The stance of not allowing the DHCP server to assign a default gateway

Binge On! - get your umbrellas out, stuff's hitting the fan.

So we went round and round back in November regarding Binge On! and whether it was net neutrality. So here's some closure to that... The EFF did some testing and discovered that what T-Mobile is actually doing doesn't match what they said it was...

Re: Smokeping targets

Something I found that is helpful once you've gathered a list of targets is the following command for generating config to paste: traceroute -w 3 [IPaddress] | grep -v "*" | grep -v "traceroute" | sed -e 's/(//g' -e 's/)//g' | awk '{ gsub(/\./,"_",$2); print " "$2"\nmenu = "$3"\ntitle = "$2"

Re: Smokeping targets

Very cool - thanks for sharing that. > On Jan 7, 2016, at 9:59 AM, Andrew Dampf wrote: > > Something I found that is helpful once you've gathered a list of targets is > the following command for generating config to paste:

Re: Smokeping targets

Hello Brian, you might want to consider joining the nlnog ring (https://ring.nlnog.net/). You can request access to a full mesh smokeping for all hosts too. Besides the ring host RIPE Atlas anchors ( https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/list/) might be another option for hosts to add to your list. Am

Re: How to update IPv6 geolocation data? Google sites blocked.

Hi Hugo, Thanks for the follow-up. For some reason both responses from Mr. Lewis ended up my Gmail (domain) Spam folder. I have never had a NANOG response go into Spam, so I didn't even think to check there. I'll give this a shot today. Thanks again! -David On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:18 PM,

Re: Smokeping targets

The NLNOG RING servers would be good targets and they expected to get pinged. https://ring.nlnog.net/participants/ On Thu, Jan 7, 2016, at 08:34 AM, Brian R. Swan wrote: > I’m setting up smokeping to try and gather some latency statistics on my > ISP to different parts of the world. Does

Re: Smokeping targets

Doh! Not sure why I didn’t think about Atlas prior to posting my question - that’s perfect. I have an Atlas node on my network too. After I put it in and played with it for a week I started a big project at work and put it on the “to play with later” list and never got back to it. :)

Re: SMS gateways

Does anyone having experience getting this to work on US networks? http://www.smsfoxbox.it/en/foxbox-lx800-gateway-100.html/ I am interested on getting this working with our Nagios notifications. On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 9:40 PM, John Levine wrote: >>Thanks for those pointers.

Re: SMS gateways

I am well aware of email-to-sms, but that is dependant on links/infrastructure that you are monitoring. (Think of it like having your Nagios system running on the same hypervisor as your other production gear. What happens if the hypervisor drops? How would you know?) The hardware sms gateway

Re: SMS gateways

There are multiple ways to skin this cat !. No, not familiar with this product... However.. 1) You know that you can send sms messages via email to pretty much any cell phone. 2) Personal Preference, if I was doing so, I would do it with a small mikrotik router + usb cell modem, very

Re: SMS gateways

I emailed smsfoxbox support asking about US network support. I am hoping to hear back soon and I will let you all know the answer. Thanks, Scott On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:40 PM, David Hubbard wrote: > Scott, I was interested in that as well, it was in my original

Re: SMS gateways

Yep, agreed in certain situations a hardware gateway is more useful. That is what I listed as item #1. A small Mikrotik Router + USB Cell Stick of your choice. make for a very inexpensive, flexible gateway. http://mum.mikrotik.com/presentations/CO10/day1/03-arnis_3g.pdf (quiet a few options

Re: SMS gateways

Scott, I was interested in that as well, it was in my original post. I’m considering that and the SMSEagle; both are from Europe. I can’t find too much on them from a real world war stories perspective, but there has been mention of the FoxBox on nanog in years past, so there are some users