> jokes aside, Its a hypothesis worth testing. It has qualities which
> make it plausible.
>
> So please, between you, find a way to specify and test it!
although the hypothesis has some intuitive appeal, how to test it is far
from obvious. and i note that, as a senior member of the measurement
In our case IPv6 traffic is ~27% of total, with ~58% dual-stack subscribers and
~7% ds-lite subscribers.
--
Tassos
nanog-...@mail.com wrote on 20/1/16 14:14:
> Hello all,
>
> Would those with IPv6 deployments kindly share some statistics on their
> percentage of IPv6 traffic?
>
> Bonus points f
No support ticket needed:
localhost login: admin
localhost>ena
localhost#bash
Arista Networks EOS shell
[admin@localhost ~]$ touch /mnt/flash/enable3px
[admin@localhost ~]$ sudo reboot
As for the OP’s question, I’ve run Cisco OEM, Brocade OEM, and a number of
different 3rd party SFP/SFP+s in
>>> We could assert that the TTL is an indication of distance traveled.
>>
>> you might hypothesize it. but the wide variance in per-hop rtt would
>> seem to belie that.
>>
>>> Maybe one should record the TTL and Address Family of all packets
>>> received from the internet ('inbound') at the nex
Enclosed stadiums won't have to worry about remote drones until they get smart
enough to open doors on their own. Not sure why the NFL gets uptight about
unauthorized recording. Most sporting events have little value once the event
is over.
matthew black
-Original Message-
From: NANOG
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 08:23:09AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> > We could assert that the TTL is an indication of distance traveled.
>
> you might hypothesize it. but the wide variance in per-hop rtt would
> seem to belie that.
>
> > Maybe one should record the TTL and Address Family of all packe
> We could assert that the TTL is an indication of distance traveled.
you might hypothesize it. but the wide variance in per-hop rtt would
seem to belie that.
> Maybe one should record the TTL and Address Family of all packets
> received from the internet ('inbound') at the next NANOG or IETF?
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 01:14:42PM +0100, nanog-...@mail.com wrote:
> Would those with IPv6 deployments kindly share some statistics on their
> percentage of IPv6 traffic?
https://twitter.com/discourse/status/679808652128030720
We're a smallish content source.
- Matt
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 01:19:00PM -0600, Matthew D. Hardeman wrote:
> I'm looking to buy a /24 of space for a new multi-homed network in the ARIN
> region. Can anyone out there speak to going rates for a /24 and best
> places to shop?
if anyone is interested, i have some legacy ARIN space that i
Send me a note off-list and I can help.
John
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Nick Ellermann
wrote:
> Is there a Comcast network opts person that could reach me off list?
> I have a routing question that makes zero sense to us, while trying to
> customer's issue at their office in Leesburg, VA
I don't know the US pricing ... but in the EU get it for less :).
I buy hundreds of optics per year from them - since 18 months they are our
exclusive partner for optic deliveries. I've to work with Juniper, Extreme
Networks, Cisco, Brocade, Fortinet, Radware and HP. Whatever you need: they
mak
Is there a Comcast network opts person that could reach me off list?
I have a routing question that makes zero sense to us, while trying to
customer's issue at their office in Leesburg, VA where Comcast is their
upstream network service. It's a simple question, looking for a simple
response, but
On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 Niels Bakker wrote:
> https://www.stateoftheinternet.com/trends-visualizations-ipv6-adoption-ipv4-exhaustion-global-heat-map-network-country-growth-data.html
Thanks, I looked at that link before I posted. Unfortunately the data is both
too coarse and too narrow to b
--- yoss...@bu.edu wrote:
From: "Gilad, Yossi"
...by better understanding network operators' practices
and concerns, we've created a short survey...
-
Anyone feeling like we're in a petri dish lately?
scott
Dear Forum,
To improve academic research on interdomain routing security by better
understanding network operators' practices and concerns, we've created a short
survey, sent to this mailing list last week:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1XHxWfUFP1lZRF0lhyDY9wZDGU81I7--65AnzhPF6cfc/viewform
I
> How does Solid Optics compare on pricing? They don't list them on their
> website.
>
Last time I checked, it was roughly US$90 for a SFP-10G-LR+-SO.
Unmanned aircraft systems are subject to the same Temporary Flight
Restrictions(TFR) as manned aircraft.
While the TFRs for Superbowl 50 are not yet published, you can be assured that
the FAA will issue some
and likely several.
Most likely everything below at least 10,000 feet for at least a 5
*Twitch **Plays* Super Bowl Drone needs to be a thing.
On 20 Jan 2016 17:43, "Scott Whyte" wrote:
>
>
> On 1/20/16 08:25, Naslund, Steve wrote:
>
>> Helicopters near the Super Bowl are cleared to be there and are flown by
>> vetted professional pilots. A human pilot in a helicopter presumably ha
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 06:45 , Jared Mauch wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Job Snijders wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:13:41PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
I propose the following axiom: the greater the distance over which a
packet is forwarded, the less likely it is
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 04:41 , Job Snijders wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 01:32:11PM +0100, nanog-...@mail.com wrote:
>> On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 Jared Mauch wrote:
>>> I currently see around 56.4:1 with the timing of peaks the same in v4 and
>>> v6.
>> So that's more in line with AMS
The only downside I see to Flexoptix is that their pricing for their SFPs,
and you must use their SFPs, are much more expensive than already
programmed SFP's from low cost providers.
For example, a regualr 10GBASE-LR SFP+ 1310nm 10km from Fiberstore is $34 (
http://www.fs.com/10gbase-lr-sfp-1310nm
Luma Optics has Arista Compatibles available. Please bear in mind some
versions of Arista OS do not accept compatibles. We are happy to discuss our
findings with you.
Eric
Luma Optics
650 996 7270
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 8:39 AM, Alex Forster wrote:
>
> Hi everyone!
>
On 20/01/16 16:56, Jeroen Wunnink wrote:
> We have good experience with Flexoptix. You can brand them yourself
> using their (free?) USB box to any vendor you want, including Arista.
> Not sure if they have QSFP's yet, but we have CFP-LR4's running
> successfully on multiple paths of our backbone.
We have good experience with Flexoptix. You can brand them yourself
using their (free?) USB box to any vendor you want, including Arista.
Not sure if they have QSFP's yet, but we have CFP-LR4's running
successfully on multiple paths of our backbone.
On 20/01/16 17:39, Alex Forster wrote:
Hi eve
Last I heard, EOS locks out non-Arista optics by default. You have to contact
support for instructions to enable 3rd party modules.
I’m running all Arista cables/optics - at the point when we ordered the pricing
was competitive with 3rd party, but that was several years ago and the vendor
was h
Go with Solid Optics (www.solid-optics.com). I can share a good sales contact
offlist.
Best regards
Jürgen Jaritsch
Head of Network & Infrastructure
ANEXIA Internetdienstleistungs GmbH
Telefon: +43-5-0556-300
Telefax: +43-5-0556-500
E-Mail: j...@anexia.at
Web: http://www.anexia.at
Anschrift
On 1/20/16 08:25, Naslund, Steve wrote:
Helicopters near the Super Bowl are cleared to be there and are flown by vetted
professional pilots. A human pilot in a helicopter presumably has some kind of
qualification to be there while a drone (although I don't like that word) could be flown
by
Hi everyone!
I'm trying to get buy-in to go with Arista for some new infrastructure, but the
Arista optics just aren't in the ballpark for us at "proof-of-concept" volume.
In Cisco-land, we've had great success using Finisar optics, and they've been
an easy "sell" to management since many Cisco
Helicopters near the Super Bowl are cleared to be there and are flown by vetted
professional pilots. A human pilot in a helicopter presumably has some kind of
qualification to be there while a drone (although I don't like that word) could
be flown by any moron with a couple hundred bucks. I al
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 15:41:31 -0600, Rafael Possamai said:
> I fail to see how drones relate to fiber cuts and the superbowl. Did the
> article author just throw that in there? The news helicopter getting aerial
> footage also poses a risk, so not sure what's special about drones.
Drones don't cost
That's right, logic is in programming chips, not their property. You just need
to know what to program ;-)
Regards,
Jeff
> On Jan 19, 2016, at 10:10 PM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 20/Jan/16 00:17, Phil Bedard wrote:
>>
>> Good point, there are many people looking at what I call FIB optim
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Job Snijders wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:13:41PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> I propose the following axiom: the greater the distance over which a
>>> packet is forwarded, the less likely it is to be an IPv6 packet.
>>
>> that is a hypothesis not an axio
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:13:41PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> > I propose the following axiom: the greater the distance over which a
> > packet is forwarded, the less likely it is to be an IPv6 packet.
>
> that is a hypothesis not an axiom [...]
Thanks.
> but an interesting hypothesis. how do y
> I propose the following axiom: the greater the distance over which a
> packet is forwarded, the less likely it is to be an IPv6 packet.
that is a hypothesis not an axiom, especially without considerable
measurement to back it up. but an interesting hypothesis. how do
you propose to test it?
r
* nanog-...@mail.com [Wed 20 Jan 2016, 13:15 CET]:
Would those with IPv6 deployments kindly share some statistics on
their percentage of IPv6 traffic?
https://www.stateoftheinternet.com/trends-visualizations-ipv6-adoption-ipv4-exhaustion-global-heat-map-network-country-growth-data.html
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 01:32:11PM +0100, nanog-...@mail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 Jared Mauch wrote:
> > I currently see around 56.4:1 with the timing of peaks the same in v4 and
> > v6.
> So that's more in line with AMS-IX (70G/4T) than Comcast/Swisscom
> then. AMS-IX:
> https:
On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 Jared Mauch wrote:
> I currently see around 56.4:1 with the timing of peaks the same in v4 and v6.
So that's more in line with AMS-IX (70G/4T) than Comcast/Swisscom then. AMS-IX:
https://ams-ix.net/technical/statistics/sflow-stats/ipv6-traffic
- Jared (the First o
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 7:14 AM, nanog-...@mail.com wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Would those with IPv6 deployments kindly share some statistics on their
> percentage of IPv6 traffic?
>
> Bonus points for sharing top IPv6 sources. Anything else than the usual
> suspects, Google/YouTube, Netflix and
Hello all,
Would those with IPv6 deployments kindly share some statistics on their
percentage of IPv6 traffic?
Bonus points for sharing top IPv6 sources. Anything else than the usual
suspects, Google/YouTube, Netflix and Facebook?
Some public information I've found so far:
- Comcast around 25%
On Monday, 18 January, 2016 19:02, "Colton Conor" said:
> What options are out there for re-programmable SFP and SFP+ transceivers?
> So far I have found both
> https://www.flexoptix.net/en/flexbox-v3-transceiver-programmer.html and
> http://solid-optics.com/tools/multi-fiber-tool/so-multi-fiber-
cats are nice
colin
Sent from my iPhone
> On 19 Jan 2016, at 15:12, "Michael O'Connor" wrote:
>
> Why do we believe network administrators can advocate perfectly for
> customer access?
> I couldn't control my own children's access without making us all
> miserable.
>
> Nation state access con
41 matches
Mail list logo
