Problem with policy-map update in Cisco ASR 1004

Hello everyone, I have a problem in updating PPPoE session policy-map via RADIUS CoA packet. When the RADIUS sends CoA to the BRAS, the policy of PPPoE session would not update. My software is asr1000rp2-adventerprisek9.03.13.00.S.154-3.S-ext.bin and The result of "debug aaa

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

SRX1500?

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

CCRs do firewalling and NAT just great. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Chris Knipe" To: "Josh Reynolds"

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

:) On Apr 15, 2016 8:45 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote: > I'm glad you're in Missouri and not in my area. :-) > > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > > - Original

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

I'm glad you're in Missouri and not in my area. :-) - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Josh Reynolds" To: "Mike Hammett"

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

Conversely, the UI is Mikrotik's big draw. :-) Being or not being like CIsco has zero bearing on me. Assuming the commands do what they say they'll do, any platform with tab complete is fine. :-) - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

If I were sold a $400/mo+ service that had a limitation like that, I would be very unhappy. To each their own. On Apr 15, 2016 8:29 PM, "Mike Hammett" wrote: > The CCRs' primary weaknesses are full tables and 1 gigabit cap per flow. > Neither is likely to be an issue for this

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

The CCRs' primary weaknesses are full tables and 1 gigabit cap per flow. Neither is likely to be an issue for this residential use case. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest Internet Exchange http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

Hope you all realize a few minor details:- Mikrotik is a ROS (Router Operating System), based on linux. Mikrotik also makes hardware called RouterBoards. Having said that... Mikrotik ROS runs on X86 platforms (such as Lanner or axiomtek) Similarly you can also run linux on the Routerboard

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

Does that lanner even do SFP+? Dont see it listed in the specs. Looks like 4210 has 2x SFP+, though their 'performance' level products look more in line with 'useful'. http://www.lannerinc.com/products/x86-network-appliances/x86-rackmount-appliances/fw-8877 As for the microtics, wonky user

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

Would still need a Chelsio / Mellanox etc card, and even then you're not going to hit line rate if you have NAT or any traffic shaping enabled at all. Maybe with DPDK/netmap/pf_ring, but that would be some pretty custom work. On Apr 15, 2016 6:47 PM, "Michael Brown"

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

Not *exactly* what you're asking for, but a Lanner appliance (‎http://www.lannerinc.com/products/network-appliances/x86-rackmount-network-appliances/nca-5210) might suit your needs. M.   Original Message   From: David Sotnick Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 16:19 To: NANOG Subject: 10G-capable

RE: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

Different philosophy - strings attached. When I sell a service, either residential or business or DIA, the terms are clearly stated. If I were selling a multi-hundred dollar a month service, the CPE cost is minimal. If I don't offer a service that is at least *capable* of providing what I'm

RE: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

Hmm, the chances of getting a single flow of more than 1gig to/from the "internet" is close to zero in a CPE situation. If the Connection is a service provider or similar sure, this limitation may well apply, but a home user (however high end), nope I just can't see it. If you need something

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

Thanks Aaron. Unless something has changed recently, I don't think the Brocade ICX series does NAT either. On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Aaron wrote: > Not a lot of 10G capable CPEs out there. For our 10G residential > customers we install Brocade ICXs. > >

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

As much as I enjoy Mikrotik products and respect my friends and peers who use them, until ROS 7.x the CCR is a "gimped" product. On Apr 15, 2016 5:10 PM, "Filip Hruska" wrote: > Hi, > > I would also vote for Mikrotik products; IMHO this looks perfect for this > situation. > >

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 12:04 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote: > Can't do more than 1Gbps per flow. Not suitable for this application. > On Apr 15, 2016 5:03 PM, wrote: > > > Check out the Mikrotik Cloud Core routers, they make them with SFP+ > > support now.

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

Hi, I would also vote for Mikrotik products; IMHO this looks perfect for this situation. http://routerboard.com/CCR1009-8G-1S-1SplusPC On 04/16/2016 12:01 AM, mike.l...@gmail.com wrote: Check out the Mikrotik Cloud Core routers, they make them with SFP+ support now. I have one of them

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

Can't do more than 1Gbps per flow. Not suitable for this application. On Apr 15, 2016 5:03 PM, wrote: > Check out the Mikrotik Cloud Core routers, they make them with SFP+ > support now. I have one of them with 10g deployed right now. > > -Mike > > > On Apr 15, 2016, at

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

Check out the Mikrotik Cloud Core routers, they make them with SFP+ support now. I have one of them with 10g deployed right now. -Mike > On Apr 15, 2016, at 14:52, Aaron wrote: > > Not a lot of 10G capable CPEs out there. For our 10G residential customers > we

Re: 10G-capable customer router recommendations?

Not a lot of 10G capable CPEs out there. For our 10G residential customers we install Brocade ICXs. Aaron On 4/15/2016 3:18 PM, David Sotnick wrote: Hello masters of the Internet, I was recently asked to set up networking at a VIP's home where he has Comcast "Gigabit Pro" service, which is

Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

>NA has a 10 digit scheme (3 area code - 7 local) though most of the >time you end up dialing the 10 digits. > >Australia has a 9 digit scheme (1 area code - 8 local) ... North America uses en bloc signalling, Australia uses CCITT style compelled signalling. That's why you have variable length

Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

On 2016-04-15 17:21, Mark Andrews wrote: > Yes the area codes are huge (multi-state) and some "local" calls > are sometimes long distance. Until early 1990s, the 819 area code spanned from the US/canada Border in Québec, around Montréal (514), included the Laurentians and just about everything

Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

In message , David Barak writes : > > On Apr 15, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > Australia is about the area as the US and has always had caller > > pays and seperate area codes for mobiles. > > Australia has fewer

Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

> On Apr 15, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > > Australia is about the area as the US and has always had caller > pays and seperate area codes for mobiles. Australia has fewer people than Texas, and is more than an order of magnitude smaller than the US by population.

10G-capable customer router recommendations?

Hello masters of the Internet, I was recently asked to set up networking at a VIP's home where he has Comcast "Gigabit Pro" service, which is delivered on a 10G-SR MM port on a Comcast-supplied Juniper ACX-2100 router. Which customer router would you suggest for such a setup? It needs to do IPv4

Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

> On Apr 15, 2016, at 12:09, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > In message <571105a6.3040...@nvcube.net>, Nikolay Shopik writes: >>> On 15/04/16 17:51, John R. Levine wrote: >>> Putting mobiles into a handful of non-geographic codes as they do in >>> Europe wouldn't work because the US

Re: [lists] Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

I highly doubt that your SIM card is depleted due to the US mobile phone billing structure. Sounds like a bad contract with a carrier that is billing you for incoming calls even though you aren't on the network, or bills you a fee each month when your SIM is inactive. Don't blame a country's

Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

In message <571105a6.3040...@nvcube.net>, Nikolay Shopik writes: > On 15/04/16 17:51, John R. Levine wrote: > > Putting mobiles into a handful of non-geographic codes as they do in > > Europe wouldn't work because the US is a very large country, long > > distance costs and charges were important,

Weekly Routing Table Report

This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Internet Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan. The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, AusNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG, PaNOG, SdNOG, BJNOG, CaribNOG and the RIPE Routing WG. Daily listings are sent to

Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

On 15/04/16 17:51, John R. Levine wrote: > Putting mobiles into a handful of non-geographic codes as they do in > Europe wouldn't work because the US is a very large country, long > distance costs and charges were important, and they needed to be able > to charge more for a mobile call across the

Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

On Friday, 15 April, 2016 15:51, "John R. Levine" said: > The US and most of the rest of North America have a fixed length > numbering plan designed in the 1940s by the Bell System. They offered > it to the CCITT which for political and technical reasons decided to > do

Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

So maybe 10% of all cell phones are primarly used in the "wrong" area? Out of curiosity, does anyone have a good pointer to the history of how / why US mobile ended up in the same numbering plan as fixed-line? The US and most of the rest of North America have a fixed length numbering plan

Re: [Ext] Re: G root not responding on UDP?

fyi, some discussion and below link from the bind mailing list on this https://atlas.ripe.net/dnsmon/group/g-root On 4/14/2016 7:36 AM, Nicholas Suan wrote: I'm see the same thing from multiple networks. $ dig NS . @g.root-servers.net ; <<>> DiG 9.9.5 <<>> NS . @g.root-servers.net ;;

Re: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 16:43:00 -0700, Todd Crane said: > You do realize that this is the exact kind of thing that caused this > discussion in the first place. I'm well familiar with that case. I was talking > about my own experiences in the food service industry, but of course you > barely > read

Re: DOCSIS 3.1 upstream

In our small, aging plant very near the Mexican border in south Texas, the SNR for <~30MHz is ~20 dB so we can only use two upstream channels. It works okay for our 150 cable modem customers. They can get 40 Mbps upstream throughput. The downstream channels are around 300MHz with much better

Re: DOCSIS 3.1 upstream

Jean-Francois Mezei wrote: > Canadian cable carriers seem to have all told the CRTC they can only > carry 42mhz in the upstream because their amplifiers and nodes only > amplify that narrow band in the upstream direction. > > Is/was 42mhz common across north america ? 42MHz was the traditional

Re: phone fun, was GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

On Thursday, 14 April, 2016 16:32, "Leo Bicknell" said: > So maybe 10% of all cell phones are primarly used in the "wrong" area? Out of curiosity, does anyone have a good pointer to the history of how / why US mobile ended up in the same numbering plan as fixed-line? Over